I guess you missed the point where I said she is featless without bm on the first page. Who cares if she fought Orbalisk Bane? She has no unamped showings that compare with Revan beating Malak.
Her skill with a blade is hard to gauge, other than the fact she is supposedly "one of the best of her era"
The best Jedi duelist of her era and apparently has one of the greatest Sith kill lists of any Jedi ever.
Something else to consider is that her apprentice Sarro Xaj was all over Zannah and she only managed to kill him because A. That newb kept interrupting his offensive. & B. Zannah resorted to using a mental attack.
He was well on his way to becoming a Jedi Weapon Master.
Yet despite all of this he was clearly not on his Master's level.
The entire era just isn't impressive 馃槵
Raskta killed a bunch of featless fodder characters, so what? That doesn't tell me anything about how good she is as much as a duel without a nexus or amp against a character who has his own dueling feats. She handled her own against a nexus amped/bloodlusted Orbalisk Bane which is a good showing, but she was still amped herself and Bane is a mediocre duelist. She's definitely the best one of her era though I guess, but she wouldn't be much in any other time.. She's likely at best Adi Gallia level or maybe approaching Quinlan Vos
She's out of her league fighting Revan
Mastered every single form to it's highest degree and was ambidextrously using them with ease.
Adi Gallia isn't even close.
Darth Bane had Orbalisk protection, Rage amp and nexus amp vs Raskta with a BM amp that was split between herself and her companions.
Now I'm not even going to bother arguing with you about Bane but this is a highly impressive feat, she was completely schooling him in that fight whilst simultaneously protecting her allies, filling in for their weaknesses and playing off their strengths.
That is a far greater dueling feat than defeating Malak and Mandalore the Ultimate.
I never denied it was an ok feat, but Bane's skill level as a duelist is lacking behind Malak who defeated Bastila and Revan once himself. Bane has only beaten two featless Sith trainees, and Raskta herself had only beaten fodder opponents. People on this forum routinely confuse technical proficiency with skill as a duelist, Raskta has no showings as a duelist to put her above Malak. She has only beaten fodder/featless opponents, whereas, Malak has beaten Bastila and Revan two notable opponents
So what if she "mastered" lightsaber combat, she has never beaten an individual above Revan or Bastila. Her technical proficiency and knowledge of forms doesn't make her a good duelist, it simply means she knows forms and is adept with a bladework as a teacher. Beating Revan >> killing fodder Sith and knowing how to teach lightsaber classes
Darth Bane is stated to be a master duelist in sourcebooks and considering that PoD Bane was able to relatively well hold himself against Kas'im (a master of every form to it's highest degree and completely mastered Jar'kai and saberstaff dueling completely) and hold him off until he killed Kas'im with the Force, Bane is far far better than your obvious trolling/lowball attempts make him out to be.
He whilst drugged was able to defeat Zannah with his fists whilst she had a saberstaff.
Cognus someone with relatively few but nonetheless excellent feats and considerable power in the Force (as the Plagueis novel confirms) could only see a blur as he and Zannah fought before he died.
Bane is a master duelist no matter how much you want to troll Neph and Lsu's feat against him is excellent and is reinforced by her countless thousands of kills against Sith in the field.
Ignore all logic and claim every single one of those Sith were nothing more than Padawan level all you wish but her feats are excellent.
This will be my final reply to you as your bias against Bane trilogy characters is laughable at best.