Revan vs Raskta Lsu

Darth Bane is stated to be a master duelist in sourcebooks and considering that PoD Bane was able to relatively well hold himself against Kas'im (a master of every form to it's highest degree and completely mastered Jar'kai and saberstaff dueling completely) and hold him off until he killed Kas'im with the Force, Bane is far far better than your obvious trolling/lowball attempts make him out to be.

Kas'im was technically proficient, not a "master duelist" and he has no feats at all or even accolades unlike Raskta. Mastering a "Saberstaff", saber forms, or any of the technical minutiae doesn't make you a good duelist, it means you have achieved academic knowledge of said aspects of those forms. Try to make the distinction between academic knowledge, and being a tried and true duelist who has beaten other individuals with their own showings. Bane didn't beat him by his own skill with a blade either, he killed him by using a nexus to kill him with a force wave. Bane only beat featless Sirak and Fohargh, after getting stomped by them both before.

He whilst drugged was able to defeat Zannah with his fists whilst she had a saberstaff.

That wasn't a duel she was trying to kill him, and he was just testing her.

Bane is a master duelist no matter how much you want to troll Neph and Lsu's feat against him is excellent and is reinforced by her countless thousands of kills against Sith in the field.

I never disputed Bane was a "master level duelist" (ok...), but he still has only beaten featless trainees. Beating two Sith trainees on Korriban aren't superior feats to Malak beating Revan or Bastila (both high level opponents) in their own right. Whatever way you try to spin it Raskta has never beaten anyone on par with Revan

Ignore all lpgic and claim every single one of those Sith were nothing more than Padawan level all you wish but her feats are excellent.

This will be my final reply to you as your bias against Bane trilogy characters is laughable at best.

"Simple logic" would say that the individual who beat X character with his own showings, would be better than Y character who has beaten nameless opponents. You do this in every thread accuse others of bias when they actually have an argument in favor of characters with actual feats- come get me when Bane or Raskta have beaten anyone on par with Revan

BOONZ BOONZ BOONZ BU-BU-BOONZ BOONZ boku no pico BOONZ BOONZ BOONZ BU-BU BOONZ BOONZ

I do this all the time? Since when? Feel free to show me where I do this all the time.

However the evidence against you is countless, your anti-Bane trilogy bias is evident in every thread, including ones where Bane isn't relevant at all.

Lol @ bias when simply supporting the character with the better feats. If Raskta had better showings then I'd argue in her favor, its as simple as that. In fact, I've supported her in other threads against other characters- as she's the closest thing to a skilled duelist in an era with lack of exposition on their skill. Beating fodder level opponents regardless of the amount, is a lesser feat than beating one of the most Powerful Sith in Galactic history while he was amped

Well forgive me, if you are going to cease that kind of trolling then I apologise and I would encourage you to do so.

Simply put you kind of dug a hole.

What "trolling"? You were the one that kept throwing out ad hominems and accusations of bias, when I was simply supporting the character with noticeably better feats (Revan).

There are numerous times where you troll about Bane even in threads where he isn't relevant. "'X' does 'x' and Bane dies in the aftermath." Etc...

Carthage>>Ancient Power.