Hercules vs Wonder Woman

Originally posted by pym-ftw
Yes I'm referring to Supermans benchpress feat vs Thor's multi planetoids/planet moon busting strikes.

Sure but moving a planet 3 feet or what ever Superman's wingspan is, is significantly less not to mention he didn't physically move the planet. He benched 6.6 quadrillion tons.

It was a lower level feat for him. If he had to exert himself, earth would have been sucked into a wormhole. Thor wishes he has strength like that.

Originally posted by pym-ftw
Did you respond to me after saying anyone responding to me is below you...

Retarded...

Thor created a planet busting shockwave across a vacuum.

Go ahead and report me, you literally bashed in the post before my response.

Originally posted by pym-ftw
Thor created a planet busting shockwave across a vacuum.

Go ahead and report me, you literally bashed in the post before my response.

And that was done with Milner, it's a striking feat rather than strength feat.

Scan of DCNU Superman moving the earth? The machine was 6quadrillion tons, which is below point impact destruction not to mention an explosion across space.

Neme while posting an interesting read, it has nothing to do with what happened in the comic.

Edit:
Mjoinir amping Thor's strength is a given but Thor is swinging it with his strength.

Originally posted by abhilegend
That's inferior to moving earth as nemebro proved to you.

And that was done with Milner, it's a striking feat rather than strength feat.

Originally posted by pym-ftw
Scan of DCNU Superman moving the earth? The machine was 6quadrillion tons, which is below point impact destruction not to mention an explosion across space.

Neme while posting an interesting read, it has nothing to do with what happened in the comic.

Edit:
Mjoinir amping Thor's strength is a given but Thor is swinging it with his strength.

Neither is your wild theories.

Milner amps Thor's striking power. At this point it's not even debatable.

Oh sorry about that. And Spidey said Sentry beat up Galactus...?

Neme was posting numbers based on Superman moving Earth to Mars. Superman didn't.

I posted numbers based on earth like planets destructions.

6.6 sextillion tons

Vs

53 quadrillion mega tons or 53 sextillion tons.

A statement from someone who was testing his powers and spidey making a hyperbole are same now? You are really desperate now.

He also said earth's Momentum is alone 10 times more than it takes to destroy earth. But as usual you ignored it.

And where was that planet said to be earth sized?

Pot/kettle. Spidey is smarter than random scientists.

The machine wasn't under earths momentum.

It is pictured if you want to play that game, prove that scientist could create a machine capable of simulating the earths weight without superman punching a massive dent in the earth.

Originally posted by pym-ftw
Oh sorry about that. And Spidey said Sentry beat up Galactus...?

Neme was posting numbers based on Superman moving Earth to Mars. Superman didn't.

I posted numbers based on earth like planets destructions.

Originally posted by pym-ftw
6.6 sextillion tons

Vs

53 quadrillion mega tons or 53 sextillion tons.

Now just show the planet Thor destroyed to be earth sized.

And superman did it casually for five days. Thor was struggling to push a part of moon after that. Seems pretty clear to me.

Not to mention brainiac shop travelling at 36000 my.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Now just show the planet Thor destroyed to be earth sized.

And superman did it casually for five days. Thor was struggling to push a part of moon after that. Seems pretty clear to me.

Not to mention brainiac shop travelling at 36000 my.

Originally posted by pym-ftw
Pot/kettle. Spidey is smarter than random scientists.

The machine wasn't under earths momentum.

It is pictured if you want to play that game, prove that scientist could create a machine capable of simulating the earths weight without superman punching a massive dent in the earth.

Sucking it away would cause its Momentum to stop.

Because that place was out of synch with earth's space-time as explained later.

Hyperbole is Hyperbole, do you really want to take hyperbole as fact vs Thor?

Originally posted by pym-ftw
Hyperbole is Hyperbole, do you really want to take hyperbole as fact vs Thor?

After a scientist measures that's strength for five days and makes a plain statement. That's not hyperbole.

Reed also believes Hulk has unlimited strength, has tested Hulk more and is generally all around smarter.

Still dumb to believe that, just like it's dumb to take any no senseical statement as fact.

Originally posted by pym-ftw
Reed also believes Hulk has unlimited strength, has tested Hulk more and is generally all around smarter.

Still dumb to believe that, just like it's dumb to take any no senseical statement as fact.

Just because it destroys your argument doesn't mean it's hyperbole. What I find ironic is you are taking a real world science fact when it suits you but ignoring an in comic science fact about the feat because it doesn't suits you. Just shows how filmsy your argument is.

And when we'll see Hulk perm feats of unlimited strength, we'll know that Reed was right.

Until then, hyperbole.

Unless you believe in unlimited anger.

So Hulk has unlimited strength in your opinion?