Anyways...of the 4 movie Sith, exactly one of them snapped out of it. And that is why I call Anakin the least evil of the bunch. The wife whose heart he broke died insisting there was still good in him. His son made Padme's last wish come true.
Nobody came for Maul, or Dooku. And Dooku had a considerable number of friends within the Jedi Order. Nobody in their right mind would go anywhere NEAR Sidious, who has more evil within him then the other 3 put together.
Originally posted by Angelalex242Have you considered that that says more about the quality of Dooku's friends than of Dooku?
Nobody came for Maul, or Dooku. And Dooku had a considerable number of friends within the Jedi Order
Anakin had someone relentlessly trying to fight for his redemption. Dooku, well, didn't.
Originally posted by Darth Abonis
Bane was not born evil if you read Path of Destruction. Tyrannus was more evil than Vader. He chose the dark side. The dark side chose Vader.
I don't think people are born evil. They become evil due to many factors like if they're rich or not, how others treat them, etc.
Originally posted by NemeBro
Dooku? Fell due to a difference of ideology, and as LL pointed out didn't actually commit much onscreen evil. Comparatively.
Remember, he was one of the two who willingly and deliberately started the Clone Wars, driving the galaxy into a huge conflict for the purpose of eliminating enemies, and was key in doing so. Damage wise, that's a lot.
Originally posted by NalanielA grilled cheese sandwich combined with "other factors" can turn someone evil. Maybe Dooku was eating lunch one day and saw Sidious's face in the bread.
Not by itself, but combined with other factors... maybe.
Nebulous shit like "if you're rich or not" doesn't mean anything.
All of them are evil.
Dooku is the least evil though. I wonder, given his delusional but semi-noble intentions, whether he'd have it in him to commit atrocities like Vader and Maul were capable of. Could he kill children?
Edit: Oh no wait, I forgot, he tried to murder Jabba's baby son. Yeah, he's pretty fvcking evil.
To me Palpa iz really nice. Iz a god guy there iz worz.
Only vitiate rize the level of evilnezz brought by the chaoz....
Re: Of the canon Sith... who is truly evil?
Originally posted by Darth Abonis
Lets look at the 4 onscreen movie sith. Darth Sidious cannot even be looked at as a person, he IS the dark side, so his morality is a non-entity. Maul was raised by Sidious from childhood. Evil is all he knew. Anakin Skywalker was mentally ill, and can be said his fate was chosen for him. That leaves Dooku.... A respected Jedi Master who left the Order, in order to pursue power. He made a choice. Isn't that true evil?
Sidious can be looked at as a person of course. He betrayed Plagueis, before he reached that so called full potential of the dark side. Plagueis trusted him, and he was ready to be ''partners'' instead of master and apprentice relationship, but Sidious didn't like that so in my point of view, Sidious is truly evil just like Maul is.
Maul's evil is kind of natural, just like Mother Talzin. Most of the Dathomir people are, well, except Ventress, it seems she is turning to the light.
1- Sidious
2- Maul
3- Bane
4- Plagueis
5- Dooku
6- Vader