Originally posted by abhilegend
That's just using no limit fallacy.Seeing how often someone destroys a planet in marvel? Nope.
Wtf are you blathering about? I'm making an observation not establishing canon and pointing out the possibility of it happening not stating fact. None of that cheese shite matters anyway in this battle as it's not combat related.
Originally posted by Sin I AM
Wtf are you blathering about? I'm making an observation not establishing canon and pointing out the possibility of it happening not stating fact. None of that cheese shite matters anyway in this battle as it's not combat related.
Originally posted by eaebiakuya
I agree.Is harder destroy a planet than hold one. Bill survived more than one planet explosion.
Originally posted by "Id"Why do people keep using the planet busting feat for BRB. It doesn't apply to a forum fight at all.
Good, Alan can hold up a planet, so Bill can smash it to bits.Horse face will smash Alan's face in, period.
Battle distance is .5km
Bill achieved the feat by ramming into the planet from astronomical distances away (lots of time to accelerate to critical speeds).
Bill will not have that luxury here so the feat is inapplicable.
Repeat with me.
Holy Molly Doughnut Shop.
Ok one more time.
Holy Molly Doughnut Shop.
One can NOT delude themselves into believing, Alan wins because he held a planet at bay. What is the face value of that space cheese? How is that applied in a combat scene?
If Alan attempts to hold Bill at bay, than guess what? Holy Molly Bill is going to break free, and make a doughnut out of Alan's Face.
Oh look a free Doughnut for Alan.