DE Luke vs Yoda

We were discussing limitations in comparison to mortals, not other immortals. There's a difference.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
@[B]The_Tempest

Darth Sidious is much more likely to be hyped as an untouchable along with Luke Skywalker in comparison to any other character, I have noticed this trend since I have joined this form. Few have considered the possibility that these two have competition from ancient era and can be defeated.[/b]

Their greater popularity is irrelevant. You waste time with non sequiturs and the obvious {"Sidious has limits! Luke has limits!" As if anyone seriously suggests otherwise.}, which wouldn't be a problem if you didn't do the exact thing you criticize for certain SWTOR characters.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
As for Emperor Vitiate:

He performed badly against Hero of Tython because he was vulnerable after the disruption of his super-ritual. It really took a toll on him for a while and he still managed to put up a reasonable fight, even destroyed a portion of Dark Temple in an effort to kill the opponents.

Anyways, member [B]DarthAnt66 is correct that Emperor Vitiate continuous to grow in power virtually endlessly in part due to his Force Drain related actions and also due to his condition. He is virtually unstoppable and would eventually reach a point that he would consume the entire galaxy if he is not stopped and his essence is not undone.

Though how his essence will be undone remains to be seen.

So far, The Ones are the latest addition to no-limits-fallacy rule. [/B]

I'm more than aware of the circumstances surrounding Vitiate's defeat. Doesn't change that he has limits. 👆

Everybody have certain limits. Otherwise, their will be no drama, realism and story-telling.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
We were discussing limitations in comparison to mortals, not other immortals. There's a difference.

facepalm

DarthAnt66
If anything, Vitiate is one of the characters who has no limits.

You never said nor suggested anything of the sort. Fact is, you let your wank get the better of you and I effortlessly smacked you down in front of God and country to the point that you seriously tried to deny the actual definition of the word limit in a desperate attempt to Frankenstein your argument. 😂

That's a level of pathetic rarely met in these parts, but you've always been an overachiever. 👆

Jesus H. Christ, even LeGenD was quicker to concede that Vitiate has limits than you, Ant.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Everybody have certain limits.

And everybody other than Ant is well aware of this. So relax, man. All is well. 👆

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Otherwise, their will be no drama, realism and story-telling.

You've got it. Proud of ya, big guy.

Originally posted by The_Tempest
facepalm

You never said nor suggested anything of the sort. Fact is, you let your wank get the better of you and I effortlessly smacked you down in front of God and country to the point that you seriously tried to deny the actual definition of the word limit in a desperate attempt to Frankenstein your argument. 😂

That's a level of pathetic rarely met in these parts, but you've always been an overachiever. 👆

Jesus H. Christ, even LeGenD was quicker to concede that Vitiate has limits than you, Ant.

That's the best excuse you can do with nearly an hour?

Not impressed.

Originally posted by Arhael
I ones made a modification in wookiepedia...

Its obviously superceded by canon sources. But it can be used as a resource.

Originally posted by The_Tempest
That's the best excuse you can do with nearly an hour?

Not impressed.

Originally posted by Lord Stark
Its obviously superceded by canon sources. But it can be used as a resource.

Originally posted by Lord Stark
Its obviously superceded by canon sources. But it can be used as a resource.

Nah. It mainly discusses "Legends" which ain't official canon anymore. Which is why I'm pretty sure the Official Site has stopped referencing it.

Besides the official site hasn't recognised Legends material as canon for a long time(before the announcement), so providing a link to where you can read more about non-canon stuff is not declaring it an Official Source.

It is after all Wookie. The fact that Wookie cites sources is all the evidence we need that Wookie isn't a source in itself.

Originally posted by DARTH POWER
It is after all Wookie. The fact that Wookie cites sources is all the evidence we need that Wookie isn't a source in itself.

That's semantics really. Bottom line wookieepedia is not accurate.

Originally posted by FreshestSlice
You've never cited a single thing in your life if you think that's true. Everything has a source somewhere that ends in first hand experiences. Science textbooks have sources. Are they not sources now?

And what's that got to do with Wookie being a "Canon" Source or not.

Star Wars is not a science that's been developed over thousands of years. There are ACTUAL SW Canon sources.

Wookie cites actual "Canon" sources like the ROTS Novel. The ROTS Novel is a Canon source and doesn't need to cite any other sources.

Lucas' s statements are also a direct Canon source. That's why Lucas doesn't need to cite evidence.

SW Wookie however is not a Canon source. And all the supposed "evidences" it does cite are very subjective. Which isn't surprising considering ANYONE can add/edit on it.

Wookie is a useful tool to learn about something you don't have a clue about. That's true for SW or anything else. But Wookie itself isn't a Scientist or a Stat Wars Scholar.