Exposing fanon hype of characters

Started by Selenial5 pages
Originally posted by ILS
One of the most notorious character wankers on the internet attempting to expose the wankery of others is remarkably ironic.

This.

And don't bother fighting with him over it. I saw a beautiful little clip the other day, which was a man explaining that to see you are unintelligent and making stupid arguments, is you have to actually be smart and you would never have made those arguments in the first place. And that's why debating on the internet is pointless, no one ever thinks they can be wrong, and views their own arguments as so correct that they'd never even acknowledge counters...

Originally posted by ares834
Nah, he just revealing his butthurt about a certain poster.

👆

and this:

Originally posted by ILS
One of the most notorious character wankers on the internet attempting to expose the wankery of others is remarkably ironic.

👆

🤨 Why the focus on Caedus while it should really be on Vitiate or Bane.

U r a silly rabbit, LeGenD.

Oh nice.

It seems that the shroud behind the FANON hype of a Legacy character have fallen, and the fans of the character or affiliated era are coming out in droves to turn this on me.

All of the critic numbskulls should note that nothing about Emperor Vitiate character is fabricated: http://www.comicvine.com/profile/s_w_legend/blog/emperor-vitiate-respect-thread/97466/

Originally posted by Selenial
This.

And don't bother fighting with him over it. I saw a beautiful little clip the other day, which was a man explaining that to see you are unintelligent and making stupid arguments, is you have to actually be smart and you would never have made those arguments in the first place. And that's why debating on the internet is pointless, no one ever thinks they can be wrong, and views their own arguments as so correct that they'd never even acknowledge counters...


This nonsense fits you well.

Don't tempt me to expose your fabrications regarding Jedi Exile in this thread. You do not have a clean debating history either.

Originally posted by Stigma
Why the focus on Caedus while it should really be on Vitiate or Bane.

U r a silly rabbit, LeGenD.


If you feel that any character have been misrepresented, you can notify me with the quotes and I will look into them.

EDIT - The hell is with the double post...

Originally posted by Selenial
This.

A bit hyperbolic, given where I normally post has never had his name crop up :hmm

All the same, I'm just bored and shooting the shit so to speak.

And that's why debating on the internet is pointless, no one ever thinks they can be wrong, and views their own arguments as so correct that they'd never even acknowledge counters...

Incredibly pointless.

Little can be said to be more stupid a hobby than crossover fictional character battle debates online.

A bit hypocritical to use this as a put down though, what with you taking part in the hobby (be it seriously or otherwise) on this debating subsection online though :maybe

All the same, this thread is kind of sad from the general tone of OPs posts.

Originally posted by ares834
So when are you going to expose the Vitiate fanboys? He is easily the most overhyped character on the forums currently.

Vitiate is constantly shat on by many posters, so I really don't see how you'd think that.

Debates are never pointless, fabricators make them pointless.

This hobby is pointless though

Fun, but incredibly pointless

Originally posted by Nephthys
Vitiate is constantly shat on my many posters, so I really don't see how you'd think that.

He's also called a god by certain posters here and said to more powerful than than the living embodiments of the force.

Every major character has its haters, that doesn't stop the wankers from being any worse though.

Originally posted by ChaosTheory123
This hobby is pointless though

Fun, but incredibly pointless


Sometimes we have time for this stuff, sometimes we do not.

I have long periods of absence due to my work routine in life.

But the point is that fabricators have hijacked these discussions and made them pointless, frustrating and pathetic.

The fun factor goes down the drain.

This thread shall serve as a reminder to the guilty for not spoiling the fun of those who like to debate about Star Wars sometimes.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Debates are never pointless, fabricators make them pointless.

I've only ever seen you concede in one debate, and that was Sidious vs Vitiate where you admitted Beni beat you.

Everything else you've never changed your viewpoint on, so..?

Originally posted by ares834
He's also called a god by certain posters here and said to more powerful than than the living embodiments of the force.

Every major character has its haters, that doesn't stop the wankers from being any worse though.


Likings and dislikings are not the point of this thread. Point is about fabricating or misrepresenting official information. This is not the first time I have called out on someone about this.

If a member fabricates and misrepresents official information, what kind of precedent he is setting? I have seen some fans going too far to support their favorites.

Exploring new ideas is also not a problem, presenting theories is also not a problem.

Problem is fabrication of official information. Do not do it. Simple.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
This nonsense fits you well.

Don't tempt me to expose your fabrications regarding Jedi Exile in this thread. You do not have a clean debating history either.

What fabrications? I've made a couple mistakes regarding the Revan novel that I've happily conceded to, who the **** would read that steaming pile of shit twice?

I've never forged quotes or sources however.

TBH Your overhype and exaggeration of a single word you find in an encyclopedic source, or your blatant ignoring of 50% of Star Wars canon is worse than getting a quote wrong. Not to mention the way you casually ignore basic common sense. IE when the SWTOR:E says Vitiate is the strongest Sith in history, you use that to say he's stronger than Sidious...

Originally posted by ares834
He's also called a god by certain posters here and said to more powerful than than the living embodiments of the force.

Every major character has its haters, that doesn't stop the wankers from being any worse though.

He's referred to as god-like and is indicated as more powerful than uber powerhouses like Hord, Nihilus, Kun, Bandon, Revan and the Dread Masters. I'm not saying I agree, but its hardly ludicrous wanking to put some stock in those descriptions and put him in the top 5 or whatever. Obviously it is absurd wanking to put him on par with the Ones but I mean, it's Legend. He doesn't count.

Vitiate's haters are more aggressive and prevalent than those of other characters in my experience. The only characters as attacked are Bane and Zannah, by the same posters I might add.

Originally posted by Nephthys
He's referred to as god-like and is indicated as more powerful than uber powerhouses like Hord, Nihilus, Kun, Bandon, Revan and the Dread Masters. I'm not saying I agree, but its hardly ludicrous wanking to put some stock in those descriptions and put him in the top 5 or whatever. Obviously it is absurd wanking to put him on par with the Ones but I mean, it's Legend. He doesn't count.

Vitiate's haters are more aggressive and prevalent than those of other characters in my experience. The only characters as attacked are Bane and Zannah, by the same posters I might add.

Do you not understand why everyone hates Vitiate though? It's literally all Legend. Everyone ****ing hates the character because one idiotic member with a hilarious grasp of Canon ruined him for everyone.

No one specifically attacks Vitiate because we have some annual committee choosing some random character to ruin.

Originally posted by Nephthys
Legend laying down the law.

Do Jaina next. Go for the set!


Jaina's boobs alone would beat the entire Bane novel cast.

Originally posted by Selenial
What fabrications? I've made a couple mistakes regarding the Revan novel that I've happily conceded to, who the **** would read that steaming pile of shit twice?

I've never forged quotes or sources however.

TBH Your overhype and exaggeration of a single word you find in an encyclopedic source, or your blatant ignoring of 50% of Star Wars canon is worse than getting a quote wrong. Not to mention the way you casually ignore basic common sense. IE when the SWTOR:E says Vitiate is the strongest Sith in history, you use that to say he's stronger than Sidious...


Great.

Was it me with the claim that Jedi Exile lost her powers on Dromund Kaas in part due to her visit to Nathema earlier?

As for the most powerful positions, I have always maintained that these are subjective matters. Emperor's hype is not limited to Sith philosophy by the way, recheck the cited profile for clarity. I believe in the possibility of Emperor being superior to Sidious but I have never stated that this is absolutely true. But I also understand that Star Wars is a continuously expanding and evolving lore, so we may never be certain about validity of any information in it long-term. We just need to keep an open mind and roll with the latest developments.

Originally posted by Selenial
Do you not understand why everyone hates Vitiate though? It's literally all Legend. Everyone ****ing hates the character because one idiotic member with a hilarious grasp of Canon ruined him for everyone.

No one specifically attacks Vitiate because we have some annual committee choosing some random character to ruin.


This is another problem.

Pinning everything on me because I bring alternate assumptions on the table.

I am the one who assembled the most comprehensive profile about this character on the web and provided information FREE OF COST from sourcebooks that cost many dollars otherwise and cannot be pirated.

You and others should be thanking me. You thankless people.

Also, don't blame me for your hatred or disliking of a character. This is really childish behavior.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Great.

Was it me with the claim that Jedi Exile lost her powers on Dromund Kaas in part due to her visit to Nathema earlier?

So you believe that you are never allowed to theorize something that is not expressly written in text? Because there are many things stated that support this theory, it's just never said exactly. These things include:

- The Exile being weakened on Natheema. This is a given. People however say she recovered afterwards before arriving on Kaas, however the exile actually felt relieved to feel the nexus of Dark Energy on Kaas, so she quite clearly was not fully recovered.
- Jedi in later life have had trouble drawing on the force on Kaas.
- She is no-where near her Kotor 2 incarnation in power.
- Drew himself states the theory is viable.

So...?

Originally posted by Selenial
So you believe that you are never allowed to theorize something that is not expressly written in text? Because there are many things stated that support this theory, it's just never said exactly. These things include:

- The Exile being weakened on Natheema. This is a given. People however say she recovered afterwards before arriving on Kaas, however the exile actually felt relieved to feel the nexus of Dark Energy on Kaas, so she quite clearly was not fully recovered.
- Jedi in later life have had trouble drawing on the force on Kaas.
- She is no-where near her Kotor 2 incarnation in power.
- Drew himself states the theory is viable.

So...?


Its ok to theorize. I see no issue with the theorizing. It can facilitate addressing the loopholes or gaps in available data.