Spidey's back w/Marvel

Started by marwash229 pages

Originally posted by Mindset
Lol, no it's not, Gecko.
iirc, those are your stats, or close to it; I didn't mean petite in a bad way. don't get defensive, babe.

also, I'm topping out at 195 these days. smallest I've been in years. my goal is 185.

estahuh

Originally posted by marwash22
iirc, those are your stats, or close to it; I didn't mean petite in a bad way. don't get defensive, babe.

also, I'm topping out at 195 these days. smallest I've been in years. my goal is 185.

estahuh

It's not and I'm not.

Spiderman would have like 3% bf, his 5'10 165 wouldn't be small at all.

based on the footage i have, it is and you are.

sure.

Originally posted by BlackZero30x
lol

In a world where the Batman Vs Superman movie has every DC hero ever....WB and DC now presents to you, Spider-Man!...because why the f**k not.

Batman: "What I need is a wise-cracking side-kick. That looks good in tights."

Superman:"EEWWWW it's so sticky!"

Originally posted by Esau Cairn
F me sideways...Quan takes me seriously. 😑
So you take it back. I'm damn good at this debating thing.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So you take it back. I'm damn good at this debating thing.
👆

I'm proud of you, buddy.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So you take it back. I'm damn good at this debating thing.

I don't consider flogging a dead horse, debating.

man, this news is sooo awesome, i bet nothing bad comes from this. I mean it's not like, Marvel would ever make a decision that would compromise or change a character based solely on popular demographic poles or anything. Marvel will never be capable of making a bad movie like Spiderman 3

Originally posted by jinXed by JaNx
man, this news is sooo awesome, i bet nothing bad comes from this. I mean it's not like, Marvel would ever make a decision that would compromise or change a character based solely on popular demographic poles or anything. Marvel will never be capable of making a bad movie like Spiderman 3

Well Marvel's still not making the Spider-Man movies. But they will have Major Creative Input. If Sony has any sense they will just do whatever Marvel says.

But agree about this news. To quote the Lego movie:

EVERYTHING IS AWESOMMMMMMEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!

Originally posted by jinXed by JaNx
Marvel will never be capable of making a bad movie like Spiderman 3

IronMan 2 & both Thors were a bit disappointing.

Worst Marvel movies (ones which people generally don't rave about):

1. IM3
2. IM2
3. Thor: TDW (Liked it at first simply because of my excitement of seeing a Thor sequel, but reality sank in with repeated viewings).

Out of those 3 I'd say the only really bad one was IM3.

But 3 out of 10 Watchable/Bad movies vs 7 out of 10 Pretty Good/Awesome movies, is a Fantastic record. And honestly the main problem seems to be the IM Sequels, which most people seem to forgive because the character himself has become by far the most popular.

Compare that to Sony's Spider-Man record. 1/3 bad movies in the first franchise (which tainted the whole series because it wasn't just bad, it was outright Awful), then 1/2 bad movies in the reboot.

Yeah if Sony has any sense they will do whatever Marvel tells them to.

I'd rather have wolverine back, but meh, I'm glad for those who like Pete.

Dc is probably shitting their pants. 😂

Originally posted by DARTH POWER
Worst Marvel movies (ones which people generally don't rave about):

1. IM3
2. IM2
3. Thor: TDW (Liked it at first simply because of my excitement of seeing a Thor sequel, but reality sank in with repeated viewings).

Out of those 3 I'd say the only really bad one was IM3.

But 3 out of 10 Watchable/Bad movies vs 7 out of 10 Pretty Good/Awesome movies, is a Fantastic record. And honestly the main problem seems to be the IM Sequels, which most people seem to forgive because the character himself has become by far the most popular.

Compare that to Sony's Spider-Man record. 1/3 bad movies in the first franchise (which tainted the whole series because it wasn't just bad, it was outright Awful), then 1/2 bad movies in the reboot.

Yeah if Sony has any sense they will do whatever Marvel tells them to.

Sony blacklisted Denzel because they thought his race was to blame for low overseas box office numbers for The Equalizer, so i do not have too much faith in their common sense

Honestly, I think two changes to SMIII would have massively upgraded it's quality:
1. Remove the scene with dancing Peter
2. Give Venom a badass voice instead of that of Topher. I liked Grace as Brock, but when he became Venom they didn't need to keep his voice. It massively downgraded the menace of the character.

If Raimi had done those two things, it wouldve undoubtedly saved the movie.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Dc is probably shitting their pants. 😂

Companies aren't organic beings that can shit or wear pants, dumbass

Originally posted by DARTH POWER
[B]
Out of those 3 I'd say the only really bad one was IM3.

Funny how out of those three, IM3 has the highest critic score

Originally posted by Firefly218
Companies aren't organic beings that can shit or wear pants, dumbass
People run the companies, dumbass. It isn't some artifical intelligence. Do you think this is the matrix or something ? You are really embarrassing yourself.

😂

Originally posted by Firefly218
Funny how out of those three, IM3 has the highest critic score
It is subjective so who cares. Quit being a lemming in life.

Originally posted by quanchi112
People run the companies, dumbass. It isn't some artifical intelligence. Do you think this is the matrix or something ? You are really embarrassing yourself.

😂


It's called a fvckin joke you brainless imp

Originally posted by quanchi112
It is subjective so who cares. Quit being a lemming in life.

I care

Originally posted by Firefly218
It's called a fvckin joke you brainless imp

I care

You were dead serious, Neo. Dc is running scared.

You can't compare subjective opinion or personal preference. You can argue your case or talk trash but you weren't really going that route.