The guy used Russia Today as a source, so, you know...
I used first source that came up on google. I don't need to rely on sources for this one. Poroshenko's video is a source that proves my point on its own.
Originally posted by Omega Vision
What do you mean no concrete evidence? There are photographs and videos of Separatists using equipment that the Ukrainian military has never possessed.
Are you sure those are legitimate photographs and videos? Do they really prove things beyond denial. Because the new president will not agree with you:
YouTube video
"This is the best evidence for the aggression and for the presence of Russian troops"
He labes those passports he is holding as "best evidence". If there are photographs and videos that make it undeniable prove of Russian invasion, then why would he be so pathethic to wave Russian passports on interview that russian military DOES NOT carry?
1. Passports are taken away from soldiers, when they join military, so those passports cannot possibly belong to Russian soldiers.
2. If Russia is denying invasion, they would make sure their soldiers did not carry any form of id.
3. Poroshenko is holding 5 passports. Two of them are internal that have any meaning only inside Russia. Three other passports are international that are used for traveling. So, russian military is carrying tourist passports now? Did they need to get visa to invade Ukraine?