Is **** shaming wrong?

Started by Omega Vision11 pages

The OP starts off with a faulty premise by conflating being a "slvt" with cheating, as JK pointed out.

A lot of the time **** shaming is perpetrated on women who are promiscuous but not unfaithful because they're not in a steady relationship of any kind. Conservative attitudes see the two things as equivalent, but its difficult to actually support this with logic, unless by being sexually promiscuous they're somehow "cheating" on God or some other such nonsense.

Originally posted by Jmanghan
Though thats what it usually comes down to when sleeping with a string of men.

Again, this is partly because juggling with many different people is a risky bet. Relationships are hard and not every one is mentally ready to engage one, but we are bombarded with the idea of being in a couple so often people will have a peer presure of sorts when it comes to dating. The more you sleep around, the more likely you'll end up running into a man/woman incapable of dealing with stuff like a grown up.

**** shaming is perpetrated on women regardless of whether they are even promiscuous. Female sexuality is frowned upon in sexist, patriarchal society, and women are shamed for it. It is wrong and stupid.

😂

Never change, Jmango.

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
😂

Never change, Jmango.

I won't.

No

*touches Surtur*

Reported for rape.

I can't rape the willing.

Sounds more like you just lack the Length to actually Rape.

Little Problems I bet.

Of course it's wrong in the sense that it's a total dick move, but nowadays we criticize anything we dislike and that's what this is. Don't get me wrong because I'm in no way suggesting it's a modern development, I'm just saying that it fits in with how we handle things so I honestly don't see it changing. The only way to change the status quo on this would be for those being shamed to STOP feeling any shame about it. As long as the shaming provokes a negative reaction from the target, it's going to continue.

Wow... Why is The S Followed by the L and then capped with U & T on the KMC Censored List?

I mean we can say SHIT. See SHIT SHIT SHIT SHIT SHITTTY ALL THE DAY LONG BIG PILE OF KMC LOVES THE SHIT!

But then some people can say things that others can't so I guess I shouldn't be surprised by any of this.


😮‍💨

I think we should morally discourage sexual promiscuity, I don't think we should be absolute dicks to them though, they're still human beings.

The answer for me is quite literally WWJD

Edit: also let me be clear, I hold the same standard for men and women on this

I'm friends with some guys who are/have been sexually promiscuous. I don't treat them any less as my friends or treat them as any lesser, but I'm also honest about my opinion on it. They can handle my moral disagreement, and I can handle them doing something I morally disagree with just fine because we're adults.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
I think we should morally discourage sexual promiscuity, I don't think we should be absolute dicks to them though, they're still human beings.

The answer for me is quite literally WWJD

Edit: also let me be clear, I hold the same standard for men and women on this

I'm friends with some guys who are/have been sexually promiscuous. I don't treat them any less as my friends or treat them as any lesser, but I'm also honest about my opinion on it. They can handle my moral disagreement, and I can handle them doing something I morally disagree with just fine because we're adults.

Who is "we"? It's not the government's job to enforce moral codes. I personally don't think people should do the nasty for fun, but from a public health stance promiscuity should be condemned for the spread of disease.

I'd like to see humans evolve beyond the need for sex tbh.

Originally posted by TempAccount
Who is "we"? It's not the government's job to enforce moral codes.

Was referring to the culture rather than the government. I'm not a fan of using the government to enforce moral codes or wealth distribution

yes

**** them

10% of men get the 90% of women

kill them all

incel uprising

Yes, it is wrong to shame girls/women who are not in a serious relationship with someone & like to sleep around with multiple partners. If it's ok for men to do it then it shouldn't be any different for women. They should make sure the guys they're sleeping around with are using condoms though. I'm not saying sleeping around isn't morally wrong, just to be clear.

Cheating is entirely different though. Cheaters should be shamed.

Being a cheater is one thing; liking a lot of sex is another.

This also doesn't take into account polyamorous relationships, which aren't exactly immoral or harming anyone. So nah, shaming girls for liking sex isn't good(especially not when boys get congratulated for that). But cheaters should be shamed, yes.

Originally posted by MythLord
Being a cheater is one thing; liking a lot of sex is another.

This also doesn't take into account polyamorous relationships, which aren't exactly immoral or harming anyone. So nah, shaming girls for liking sex isn't good(especially not when boys get congratulated for that). But cheaters should be shamed, yes.

Yeah not sure what the **** I was implying back then saying girls who cheated also went hand-in-hand with cheating.