A non-credible debater firmly believing I can't have an independent opinion. 👆
Apparently this...
http://www.comicvine.com/profile/darthant66/blog/the-power-of-darth-revan-overview/103361/
...reflects resemblance to your Dooku vs Revan essay.
🙄
In terms of the technicalities of debating protocol, yeah. But something seldom understood is that objectivity is another part of said protocol, aka when you say i sprinkle PT wank with my TOR wank. You did a good job of giving all the information as it is (objectivity), and clarified what you personally believe the information implicated, but also left it open to interpretation.
Originally posted by XSUPREMEXSKILLZ
What is this about?
Ant continuously takes credit for arguments you form for Revan, which happen to be very persuasive, which includes logic and reasoning I've never seen from Ant alone. Yet he claims that you take arguments from him, and has stated that you have admitted to doing so. Mostly, he was referring to your very last analysis regarding the comparison between Revan and Dooku. In response, I had told him that it wasn't the last argument that I found most persuasive, but the argument before it, which had you go in depth regarding the power and feats of Revan's inferiors--those same inferiors who nearly idolize Revan for his power and knowledge. You then backed it by more objective sources (which concluded Revan to be noticeably above those same characters), and what little feats we had from Revan at the time, which showcased an immense level of raw power and mastery. Along with other evidence and complex reasoning you had provided to back up your argument.
While Ant is no doubt the most knowledgeable on all things Revan, I've never seen him put Revan's power in such perspective. Therefore, I thought that him trying to take credit for arguments you formulated was a bit extreme. However, since we're on the subject, I'll ask: is Ant the mastermind behind your arguments?
Now as for my comment about his latest Revan respect thread, I only skimmed it, and it wasn't too bad from what I read, and it seemed as if he were trying to utilize your method in evaluating Revan's power, hence the approach comment. Not suggesting it resembled your deep analysis to T, because I'm positive it didn't. The "not bad" part of my statement: you're a good example to follow. If that was what he was doing.
Not sure how you took it, but we've had one on one conversations so you know what's up, SKILLS. In any case, it's not a big deal. Just me implying that his pompous attitude is unnecessary, as he's not nearly as good as he thinks he is, which is a bit annoying. He certainly has no room to comment on anyone else's debating skills, let alone self-establish himself as being superior to them. I wouldn't mind his behavior if he was even half as good as he thinks he is. Not to mention his obsession with my debating skills and credibility is most disturbing. For instance, there have been plenty of times that someone will compliment me, and then he'll have something negative to say about it; or if a poster, who is pretty much irrelevant to me, says something negative about me, he'll get super hype and happy. Just not sure where it's stemming from, really, but it is weird, very, lol.
Ant continuously takes credit for arguments you form for Revan
We made a lot of our arguments together, either in SWTOR or TOF.which includes logic and reasoning I've never seen from Ant alone.
Probably because I didn't take you seriously since your Ventress vs Revan argument with Nephthys. 👆
Among the most notable is probably Revan's Raw Power Comparison featuring his tutaminis versus Yoda's.Yet he claims that you take arguments from him, and has stated that you have admitted to doing so.
You're exaggerating. I never said that, we made a lot of shit together.
I claim you put so much faith in him you deny everything I say as original.but the argument before it, which had you go in depth regarding the power and feats of Revan's inferiors--those same inferiors who nearly idolize Revan for his power and knowledge.
Only essay I seen Skillz write was the Dooku one, so I never even read that.
That being said, I wrote a major Revan blog that featured similar in May 2014.
Check it out: http://www.comicvine.com/profile/darthant66/blog/revans-lightsaber-abilities-overview/97613/You then backed it by more objective sources (which concluded Revan to be noticeably above those same characters), and what little feats we had from Revan at the time, which showcased an immense level of raw power and mastery.
This isn't an original argument of his. They used this on Wookieepedia for ages, and I used it for my Revan Respect Thread all the way back in December 2013 and before.I've never seen him put Revan's power in such perspective
Which means you never read my other threads. 👆Therefore, I thought that him trying to take credit for arguments you formulated was a bit extreme.
Now as for my comment about his latest Revan respect thread, I only skimmed it, and it wasn't too bad from what I read, and it seemed as if he were trying to utilize your method in evaluating Revan's power, hence the approach comment. Not suggesting it resembled your deep analysis to T, because I'm positive it didn't. The "not bad" part of my statement: you're a good example to follow. If that was what he was doing.
His arguments? You do realize majority of the thread is highlighting Revan's psychological warfare featuring content that hasn't been explored since 2005?
While Skillz helped me on the Revan's Raw Power Comparison, I had to go personally digging for virtually all the content in that thread via the dialogue files.
Not sure how you took it, but we've had one on one conversations so you know what's up, SKILLS. In any case, it's not a big deal. Just me implying that his pompous attitude is unnecessary, as he's not nearly as good as he thinks he is, which is a bit annoying. He certainly has no room to comment on anyone else's debating skills, let alone self-establish himself as being superior to them. I wouldn't mind his behavior if he was even half as good as he thinks he is. Not to mention his obsession with my debating skills and credibility is most disturbing. For instance, there have been plenty of times that someone will compliment me, and then he'll have something negative to say about it; or if a poster, who is pretty much irrelevant to me, says something negative about me, he'll get super hype and happy. Just not sure where it's stemming from, really, but it is weird, very, lol.
*glances over at Sasukedc*
The irony.
🙄
Coming from someone who conceded he never read any of my works.
Since I'm generous: http://www.comicvine.com/profile/darthant66/blog/darthant66-s-thread-directory/103379/
Read them, then we can talk, babe. 👆 Until then? You are dismissed.
If you still feel the same way, then maybe we can discuss in a ground where you hold a cent of credibility.