Is Marvel dominating DC

Originally posted by quanchi112
Again that is your opinion. Objectively they are huge successes and the majority clearly liked the Avengers. Dc currently isn't honoring the spirit of their characters least of all with Superman on the big screen. This makes me giggle as you cry about marvels success.

I'm not crying about Marvel's success, I don't care if they're successful. I enjoy Marvel comics a great deal, and I wish they'd make more awesome movies. But as of now, I don't care for most of them, and don't think they're doing any better than DC.

I agree that although Marvel has a ton of more cinematic movies that a higher perecentage of DC's are higher quality overall. I think that's why DC takes longer to make a movie. They want to make sure they get it right.Marvel has quantity but DC has better quality, imo.

Oh, and LOL@ quan for thinking that any Iron Man movie was better than MOS.

😐

Originally posted by Star428
I agree that although Marvel has a ton of more cinematic movies that a higher perecentage of DC's are higher quality overall. I think that's why DC takes longer to make a movie. They want to make sure they get it right.Marvel has quantity but DC has better quality, imo.

Oh, and LOL@ quan for thinking that any Iron Man movie was better than MOS.

Mos borrowed a little to heavily from other movies and it really didn't represent clark the right way.

Take longer to get it right? They have 3 batman movies, 1 Green Lantern movie, and 1 Superman movie vs 10 Marvel Studio movies, 5 Spiderman Movies, 7 X-men movies, 2 Kick Ass movies, 2 Fantastic Four movies, 1 Daredevil, 1 Electra, and 2 Ghost Rider movies.

Even taking into account the last few movies I mentioned, MCU is still batting 1000 with their core 10 series. They are the ultimate popcorn flicks - and that's what they were made to be. They are 10/10 exactly what Marvel wanted them to be. The Studio movies were not made for the same audience as the Batman films (Nolan's style vs action/comedy), the Spiderman movies gave us the genre, the X-men movies only have one actual bomb, the FF/DD were middling affairs, Kick Ass was great, while we won't talk about Electra or Ghost Rider.

Meanwhile, GL was a massive, massive, MASSIVE bomb that delayed them from making more films because he was going to be their Iron Man, the one to start the universe. It didn't need to have happened, and I put the blame exclusively on meddling executives and the director/editor. Should have followed the actual script, it was actually really good. MOS wasn't bad (like some here on KMC like to say), but it was not better than Iron Man (the first movie.)

You could say they have a higher percentage of higher quality but that's because their pool is tiny in comparison and they had Nolan helming Batman for three films. That's the one and only reason that they are a factor - and the Batman movies don't tie into the current idea of a shared universe. No, the reason they are taking so long is due to fear. Fear after what happened to GL.

Somewhere out there, I live in a parallel universe where GL was amazing and he was going to get the attention he deserved. Stupid meddlers.

Originally posted by Star428
I think that's why DC takes longer to make a movie. They want to make sure they get it right.

The first Ironman film was better than MOS.

Originally posted by Blair Wind
Take longer to get it right? They have 3 batman movies, 1 Green Lantern movie, and 1 Superman movie vs 10 Marvel Studio movies, 5 Spiderman Movies, 7 X-men movies, 2 Kick Ass movies, 2 Fantastic Four movies, 1 Daredevil, 1 Electra, and 2 Ghost Rider movies.

Even taking into account the last few movies I mentioned, MCU is still batting 1000 with their core 10 series. They are the ultimate popcorn flicks - and that's what they were made to be. They are 10/10 exactly what Marvel wanted them to be. The Studio movies were not made for the same audience as the Batman films (Nolan's style vs action/comedy), the Spiderman movies gave us the genre, the X-men movies only have one actual bomb, the FF/DD were middling affairs, Kick Ass was great, while we won't talk about Electra or Ghost Rider.

Meanwhile, GL was a massive, massive, MASSIVE bomb that delayed them from making more films because he was going to be their Iron Man, the one to start the universe. It didn't need to have happened, and I put the blame exclusively on meddling executives and the director/editor. Should have followed the actual script, it was actually really good. MOS wasn't bad (like some here on KMC like to say), but it was not better than Iron Man (the first movie.)

You could say they have a higher percentage of higher quality but that's because their pool is tiny in comparison and they had Nolan helming Batman for three films. That's the one and only reason that they are a factor - and the Batman movies don't tie into the current idea of a shared universe. No, the reason they are taking so long is due to fear. Fear after what happened to GL.

Somewhere out there, I live in a parallel universe where GL was amazing and he was going to get the attention he deserved. Stupid meddlers.

That's all subjective, though. I'd rank MOS right around IM 1, but definitely better than Thor, IM 2 and 3, Hulk, and the first Cap. It also made more money than most MCCU movies and if WB plays their cards right, the DCCU can make more money than the first 10 MCCU at the box office. We already know Batman V Superman is going to be huge and the same can be said with Suicide Squad. They just keep releasing awesome news after awesome news with Squad. I'm actually anticipating that movie more than Batman V Superman, personally.

I'm going to be perfectly honest. I've enjoyed all the Superman and Batman recent movies more than almost all of the Marvel films. The only exception I think would be Avengers. It was really good but I still liked Superman Returns (yes, I liked this) , MOS, Batman Begins and Dark Knight Rises even better. As I've said before, none of the Iron Man movies were anything special (not to me, anyway) although they were pretty decent.

Originally posted by iceman24567
The first Ironman film was better than MOS.

😆

Originally posted by carver9
😐

😕

Originally posted by Star428
😆

Can't wait to see Suicide Squad and Avengers: AOE.

Originally posted by Reflassshh
Can't wait to see Suicide Squad and Avengers: AOE.

Are you looking forward to BVS?

The reason why DC is doing so much better in games is because Warner Bros own their own studios. They own Rocksteady, Neatherrealm and Traveler Tales, meanwhile Disney whores out their license to anyone for a cheap cash in including Activision, although they did give the license to Warner Bros to make Lego Marvel/.

The reason iron man is better (subjectively speaking) than mos is originality. Mos lacked heart

Originally posted by Rezactic
The reason why DC is doing so much better in games is because Warner Bros own their own studios. They own Rocksteady, Neatherrealm and Traveler Tales, meanwhile Disney whores out their license to anyone for a cheap cash in including Activision, although they did give the license to Warner Bros to make Lego Marvel/.

The latest Lego Batman easily outsold the last Amazing Spider-Man game. The Lego universe is on a role.

Originally posted by Golgo13
Are you looking forward to BVS?

Originally posted by Golgo13
The latest Lego Batman easily outsold the last Amazing Spider-Man game. The Lego universe is on a role.

Originally posted by Golgo13
I'd rank MOS right around IM 1, but definitely better than Thor, IM 2 and 3, Hulk, and the first Cap....I'm actually anticipating that movie more than Batman V Superman, personally.

i....actually agree with you on all the above points. 😐 i really enjoyed thor, but IM 2 and 3 not so much, and the first cap was a chore to get through for me.