Originally posted by Robtard
"At least 70 Kenyan students were massacred Thursday when Somalia's Shebab Islamist group raided a university, the interior minister said, the country's deadliest attack since US embassy bombings in 1998."Truly awful, by why does religion factor in when Muslims kill in Africa but it doesn't when Christians kill in Africa?
^ This is the post Surt copied my "awful" from.
"Macron declared at a ceremony for the murdered teacher that France would not denounce the controversial cartoons despite the anger expressed by Muslims.
"He was killed because Islamists want our future," Macron said. "They will never have it."
Good, why the hell should he condemn the cartoons? This is insane. The muslims should be angry some piece of shit beheaded someone, not at cartoons.
Originally posted by BackFire
They should enshrine the cartoons and print them in every newspaper worldwide.
Those in power In the Western world are cowards by default in this day in age.
Let’s use this place as an example. Many in this place bends over for Islam, while at the same time using the Crusade as a way to say Christianity is evil.
A few here puts the blames on the victims of Charlie Hebdo, and not Islam.
What’s funnier, is all those fools are western individuals, who wouldn’t survive without the freedom the west has provided them.
"Nice mayor says 'everything suggests' the incident was a terror attack - and that assailant shouted 'Allahu Akbar'"
Originally posted by wxyzJust the former Prime Minister of Malaysia commenting on the terrorist attack in France.
It he's referring to what happened during the Crusades then he's quite ignorant. The muslims invaded France and other parts of Europe and killed no telling how many frenchmen and other europeans in the process.
The muslims were not some sweet, innocent little victims who just minded their own business and never hurt anyone lol.
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnaefacepalm
It he's referring to what happened during the Crusades then he's quite ignorant. The muslims invaded France and other parts of Europe and killed no telling how many frenchmen and other europeans in the process.The muslims were not some sweet, innocent little victims who just minded their own business and never hurt anyone lol.
Tunisian carrying Quran fatally stabs 3 in French church
The most peaceful stabbing in history.
The f*ck is it about France? What did they specifically do to this religion? Steal its lunch money everyday in school? Take a dump in a brown paper bag, light it on fire, and leave it on Islam's doorstep?
Originally posted by Surtur
Tunisian carrying Quran fatally stabs 3 in French churchThe most peaceful stabbing in history.
The f*ck is it about France? What did they specifically do to this religion? Steal its lunch money everyday in school? Take a dump in a brown paper bag, light it on fire, and leave it on Islam's doorstep?
I mean, yeah, basically, they ran brutal imperial regimes in predominantly Muslim countries, and created an eternal underclass of them in the home country. Of course that doesn't make any of these acts of Islamic terrorism in any way right, but there are historical reasons why it happens in France a lot.
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
It he's referring to what happened during the Crusades then he's quite ignorant. The muslims invaded France and other parts of Europe and killed no telling how many frenchmen and other europeans in the process.The muslims were not some sweet, innocent little victims who just minded their own business and never hurt anyone lol.
Even if during the crusades the muslims were the victims(they were not) the tweet would still be sheer lunacy. Even more disturbing is the tweet had over 1,000 likes.
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
It he's referring to what happened during the Crusades then he's quite ignorant.
The French are up to shenanigans again.
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
The muslims invaded France and other parts of Europe and killed no telling how many frenchmen and other europeans in the process.The muslims were not some sweet, innocent little victims who just minded their own business and never hurt anyone lol.
Timeline = 719 AD - 759 AD (centuries before CRUSADES)
Outcome = French Victory
Why Umayyad invaded Spain in the first place?
"The invasion of Spain was the result both of a Muslim readiness to invade and of a call for assistance by one of the Visigothic factions, the “Witizans.” Having become dispossessed after the death of King Witiza in 710, they appealed to Mūsā for support against the usurper Roderick. In April or May of 711 Mūsā sent an Amazigh army headed by Ṭāriq ibn Ziyād across the passage whose modern name, the Strait of Gibraltar, derives from Jabal al-Ṭāriq; in July they were able to defeat Roderick in a decisive battle."
LINK: https://www.britannica.com/place/Spain/Muslim-Spain
There were European ENABLERS in the matter.
And when you enter a region encompassing multiple entities, you risk getting dragged into its political dynamics further and further (chain-of-events shaping perceptions over time).
Umayyad intervention in European regions was Politically-motivated in large part.
Crusades were Religiously-motivated in large part.
You need to study history more carefully, my friend.
Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
You need to dig into French atrocities in Africa by and large.The French are up to shenanigans again.
You are alluding to Umayyad invasion of Gaul via Spain?
Timeline = 719 AD - 759 AD (centuries before CRUSADES)
Outcome = French Victory
Why Umayyad invaded Spain in the first place?
"The invasion of Spain was the result both of a Muslim readiness to invade and of a call for assistance by one of the Visigothic factions, the “Witizans.” Having become dispossessed after the death of King Witiza in 710, they appealed to Mūsā for support against the usurper Roderick. In April or May of 711 Mūsā sent an Amazigh army headed by Ṭāriq ibn Ziyād across the passage whose modern name, the Strait of Gibraltar, derives from Jabal al-Ṭāriq; in July they were able to defeat Roderick in a decisive battle."
LINK: https://www.britannica.com/place/Spain/Muslim-Spain
There were European ENABLERS in the matter.
And when you enter a region encompassing multiple entities, you risk getting dragged into its political dynamics further and further (chain-of-events shaping perceptions over time).
Umayyad intervention in European regions was Politically-motivated in large part.
Crusades were Religiously-motivated in large part.
You need to study history more carefully, my friend.
No, I don't. Muslim aggression is the reason the Crusades started.
Originally posted by Surtur
Even if during the crusades the muslims were the victims(they were not) the tweet would still be sheer lunacy. Even more disturbing is the tweet had over 1,000 likes.
M. Mahathir have no history of neo-colonalism to speak of.
Coming back to crusades:-
Massacres of Jews in Rhineland: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhineland_massacres
Massacres of Jews and Muslims in Jerusalem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Jerusalem_(1099)
WAIT - how come Jews and Muslims were co-existing peacefully in Jerusalem? They were actually until the Christians came to LIBERATE them from this world, let alone figuratively.
WE need to move forward, not backwards.
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
No, I don't. Muslim aggression is the reason the Crusades started.
There is no justification for raising an army and deciding to invade a Foreign land one fine day on grounds of what happened in your neighborhood centuries ago to avenge perceived/alleged victims of the time. This act is ON YOU and YOU ALONE.