Originally posted by Trocity
It does seem to be an era with strong powerhouses and a thinner average cast. I guess that's just what I was getting at, Thon and Nomi have been compared to Yoda ( or vice versa ), and I feel like the strongest Jedi from that era were definitively some of the strongest ever.
Yea, ToTJ-KotoR is solid on those grounds. It's equivalent to, like, the Hundred Year Darkness with the Sith, IMO. The HYD has a small cast of really badass sith, then a falloff.
I do feel that ToTJ era probably put too little emphasis on the martial end. Arca Jeth actively distained the lightsaber at times, and he was one of the big names. Vodo was the only Jedi teacher who really emphasized it. Which probably played a fair role in why Exar and Ulic, sword prodigies both, could dominate so much...
50-year later KotoR, i.e. Revan and Meetra time, was IMO one of the weaker era. You had the powerful sith, and then almost nada. The Sith, which were made up of a full 1/3rd of the Jedi Order and including the biggest two badasses of the time had Revan and Malak... then Bandon, and we don't have anyone else as badass as Bandon save maybe for pre-immortality Sion. Then with the Triumvirate you had Nihilus! Traya!... Sion!... and then everyone else was just fodder, the Jedi and Sith pretty much had a double-KO there.
To mention another era for contrast, Legacy has a short list of powerhouses, but a deep list of reasonably strong masters below them (due in large part to fielding three well-trained orders rather than two). I feel it above the later-KotoR, and has pros and cons when compared to the ToTJ-KotoR era.