(Rematch) The Hulk (MCU) VS Thor (MCU)

Started by FrothByte64 pages
Originally posted by quanchi112
He shot lightning from his hands. More excuses that a lightning bolt from the sky would defeat the Hulk. Another hey if this would have have lend or if Thor kept his distance and flew with his hammer in the fight type tactic. Hulk tanked the lightning Thor used. I don't E speculate I argue based off the facts.

So you admit that Thor never hit Hulk with a lightning bolt similar to that which he hit Hela with or the one he took down leviathans with?

Calling it speculation doesn't change the fact that you've argued for years that you were right.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Calling it speculation doesn't change the fact that you've argued for years that you were right.
You are ignoring the fight ending in a standstill. I speculated but that wasn't the crux of my argument. Get it together.

Nothing you just posted refutes my point.

Originally posted by FrothByte
So you admit that Thor never hit Hulk with a lightning bolt similar to that which he hit Hela with or the one he took down leviathans with?
I said he used lightning and a lightning amped jump punch. The biggest bolt ever didn't even really hurt her. It's the same old had Thor done this or that type argument. Focus on the facts not what ifs. Hulk withstood the lightning and the lightning amped punch. He recovered. He's the Hulk a superior physical specimen.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Nothing you just posted refutes my point.
You're ignoring the facts. Typical excuse maker. Odin didn't put Thanos down in Asgard. 🙂

Originally posted by quanchi112
I said he used lightning and a lightning amped jump punch. The biggest bolt ever didn't even really hurt her. It's the same old had Thor done this or that type argument. Focus on the facts not what ifs. Hulk withstood the lightning and the lightning amped punch. He recovered. He's the Hulk a superior physical specimen.

I am not asking whether Hulk would have survived a ligjtning bolt or not. I'm merely clarifying that Thor never hit Hulk with a lightning bolt. Agree or disagree?

You still haven't refuted my point.

Originally posted by FrothByte
I am not asking whether Hulk would have survived a ligjtning bolt or not. I'm merely clarifying that Thor never hit Hulk with a lightning bolt. Agree or disagree?
Semantics. He hit him with two lightning attacks and we see the biggest one ever do no significant damage to Hela. Consider me unimpressed when it comes to comparing these two characters.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You still haven't refuted my point.
You avoided my point and are stuck repeating yourself retard style. This is all you bring to a debate; nothing.

Your point had nothing to do with what I said. As such, there was no reason to respond to it.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Your point had nothing to do with what I said. As such, there was no reason to respond to it.
You ignored my argument and wanted to begin your circular troll game. I'll play since I want the posts. You'll say uncle first.

Whoever gets this too 1K replies first wins.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You ignored my argument and wanted to begin your circular troll game. I'll play since I want the posts. You'll say uncle first.

Your argument did not address my point and therefore did not merit a response.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Semantics. He hit him with two lightning attacks and we see the biggest one ever do no significant damage to Hela. Consider me unimpressed when it comes to comparing these two characters.

Why are you avoiding the question? Did Thor hit Hulk with a lightning bolt or not? I'll even make it easy for you. Did Thor hit Hulk with a ranged attack?

Originally posted by quanchi112
I am sick of Thor fans saying if the fight continued or Thor did this or that would have happened. It's speculation.

No. We're saying Thor was ALREADY winning and had him on the ropes Twice. First when he smacked him across the arena. Second with the Lightning punch.

No amount of whining or excuses from you is going to change that.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Your argument did not address my point and therefore did not merit a response.
You didn't address my argument and centered around the speculation. You are weak and will always be a circular troll.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Why are you avoiding the question? Did Thor hit Hulk with a lightning bolt or not? I'll even make it easy for you. Did Thor hit Hulk with a ranged attack?
Yes, he hit him with a ranged attack. I've already responded to the facts. Your speculation is desperate at best.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I said he used lightning and a lightning amped jump punch. The biggest bolt ever didn't even really hurt her. It's the same old had Thor done this or that type argument. Focus on the facts not what ifs. Hulk withstood the lightning and the lightning amped punch. He recovered. He's the Hulk a superior physical specimen.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
No. We're saying Thor was ALREADY winning and had him on the ropes Twice. First when he smacked him across the arena. Second with the Lightning punch.

No amount of whining or excuses from you is going to change that.

Thor hurt him just like he did with his initial Mjolnir strike from the first Avengers film. Hulk recovered in this film just like he did in that one. Thor didn't win he just hurt the Hulk. That isn't indicative of a win no matter how badly you want it to. Hulk wasn't even sore after their fight but Thor was.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Thor hurt him just like he did with his initial Mjolnir strike from the first Avengers film. Hulk recovered in this film just like he did in that one.

Difference is Thor was just getting started unleashing his actual true power here.

Hulk only recovered after GM zapped Thor which doesn't count.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Thor didn't win he just hurt the Hulk. That isn't indicative of a win no matter how badly you want it to.

No the fight ended with Thor unleashing his true power which was clearly above Hulk.

There's nothing anywhere to indicate Hulk could have turned the tables so stop pretending there was.

You're using double standards as well. For years you argued Hulk kicked Thor's butt in the first Avengers because the fight got interrupted when Hulk was winning. Now you're claiming this fight ending with Thor winning means nothing and could have been overturned, with nothing suggesting that anywhere.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Hulk wasn't even sore after their fight but Thor was.

Moot point given Hulk wasn't zapped by GM.

Thor also took Everything Hulk had, whereas Hulk only got a taste of Thor's power.