Originally posted by Darth Thor
He has the feats to back it up.You not liking it doesn’t change that.
Okay.
1. Dont compare a Leviathan with Hulk. Just a real stupid comparison!
2. The Iron Man suit took a Thor Lightning with 0 damage.
A mk 6 IM suit is nowhere as durable as the Hulk!
3. A laser isnt equal to a lightning.
Lightning involves electricity, lasers dont.
4. Unless you have proof that electricity harms the Hulk your point is rebuked.
In Ragnarok Thors Lightning punches had no shocking effect on the Hulk. The Hulk wasnt electrocuted. I dont see why a lightning would electrocute the Hulk.
So bring me evidence DarkThor not just speculation.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Okay.1. Dont compare a Leviathan with Hulk. Just a real stupid comparison!
2. The Iron Man suit took a Thor Lightning with 0 damage.
A mk 6 IM suit is nowhere as durable as the Hulk!
3. A laser isnt equal to a lightning.
Lightning involves electricity, lasers dont.
4. Unless you have proof that electricity harms the Hulk your point is rebuked.
In Ragnarok Thors Lightning punches had no shocking effect on the Hulk. The Hulk wasnt electrocuted. I dont see why a lightning would electrocute the Hulk.
So bring me evidence DarkThor not just speculation.
Actually, it should be up to you to prove that Hulk is immune to electricity. Certainly, nothing in the movie has been shown to make us believe he is immune.
You are attributing a certain power/skill to Hulk, burden of proof is on you. Shifting burden of proof on us is pretty much a no limits fallacy.
Originally posted by FrothByte
Actually, it should be up to you to prove that Hulk is immune to electricity. Certainly, nothing in the movie has been shown to make us believe he is immune.You are attributing a certain power/skill to Hulk, burden of proof is on you. Shifting burden of proof on us is pretty much a no limits fallacy.
You are the ones claiming electricity harms the Hulk. I say give me proof!
1. Thor's electric punch had 0 electric effect on the Hulk! Besides the raw.power of the punch there was no electric effect on him! Atleast not a clear one.
2. Never wondered why Hulk had no Obidience Disk on him? Perhaps because it had 0 effect on him.
Where is your evidence now?
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
I said the energy released from the explosion was harmless. Even gave you movie feats proving such.Clearly your argument lost validity.
LOL!!!
What you did was give some half-assed biased speculation about why you feel the energy was harmless. nobody agreed with it.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
You are the ones claiming electricity harms the Hulk. I say give me proof!1. Thor's electric punch had 0 electric effect on the Hulk! Besides the raw.power of the punch there was no electric effect on him! Atleast not a clear one.
2. Never wondered why Hulk had no Obidience Disk on him? Perhaps because it had 0 effect on him.
Where is your evidence now?
What you're basically doing is saying "Hulk is invulnerable to everything unless proven otherwise". That's called a no-limits fallacy and is against the mvf rules. It also makes you look like a jerk and is just bad debating in general.
P.S. getting knocked flat on your ass and thrown a couple dozen feet away is not "zero effect".
Originally posted by FrothByte
What you're basically doing is saying "Hulk is invulnerable to something unless proven otherwise". That's called a no-limits fallacy and is against the mvf rules. It also makes you look like a jerk and is just bad debating in general.
Check out his retarded Bi-Frost argument, it'll be good for a laugh.
Originally posted by Silent Master
LOL!!!What you did was give some half-assed biased speculation about why you feel the energy was harmless. nobody agreed with it.
Hahaha. Ignoring the evidence wont make you any less misinformed SM.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Check out his retarded Bi-Frost argument, it'll be good for a laugh.
Nothing else can be expected from a troll like you.