(Rematch) The Hulk (MCU) VS Thor (MCU)

Originally posted by FrothByte
What you're basically doing is saying "Hulk is invulnerable to everything unless proven otherwise". That's called a no-limits fallacy and is against the mvf rules. It also makes you look like a jerk and is just bad debating in general.

P.S. getting knocked flat on your ass and thrown a couple dozen feet away is not "zero effect".

Lol!

Hahaha. Even with the evidence you still believe your speculation has any weight?

Thor's lightning punch had 0 electric effect on the Hulk. The punches power threw Hulk Away not the electricity!

Remember Hulk stood without an issue after those punches. So i dont see your point proven.

So give me evidence of that the Hulk gets affected by electricity. Evidence strong enough to counter mines!

How funny. I thought you were the one who didnt believe in speculation!

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Lol!

Hahaha. Even with the evidence you still believe your speculation has any weight?

Thor's lightning punch had 0 electric effect on the Hulk. The punches power threw Hulk Away not the electricity!

Remember Hulk stood without an issue after those punches. So i dont see your point proven.

So give me evidence of that the Hulk gets affected by electricity. Evidence strong enough to counter mines!

How funny. I thought you were the one who didnt believe in speculation!

We're not even talking about speculation here. We're talking about a basic rule called the no-limits fallacy which is what you're doing.

If I told you I'm immune to getting stabbed, I won't win this argument by saying "My proof is because you can't prove I'm not".

Edit:

To make things simple, If the energy was harmless. how was it going to destroy Jotunheim?

Originally posted by FrothByte
We're not even talking about speculation here. We're talking about a basic rule called the no-limits fallacy which is what you're doing.

If I told you I'm immune to getting stabbed, I won't win this argument by saying "My proof is because you can't prove I'm not".

HAHAHAHA. The same one you are using? Cause your no-limit fallancy is to say that a superhero is vulnerable to everything unless proven otherwise.

So just because Superman was never beaten by a snake it means he is vulnerable to it!?

If you are going to bring a point THEN ATLEAST SHOW EVIDENCE/LOGIC BACKING IT UP!

YOU WERE THE ONES CLAIMING ELECTRICITY HARMS HULK. I SAY PROVE IT!

You then pathetically tried to evade my demands by asking ME EVIDENCE that he is immune to it! I gave you MY EVIDENCE which then you evaded!

Now you claim me of no limits fallacy when your original claim itself is unfounded!

Originally posted by Silent Master
Edit:

To make things simple, If the energy was harmless. how was it going to destroy Jotunheim?

Lol

LOL!!!

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
HAHAHAHA. The same one you are using? Cause your no-limit fallancy is to say that a superhero is vulnerable to everything unless proven otherwise.

So just because Superman was never beaten by a snake it means he is vulnerable to it!?

If you are going to bring a point THEN ATLEAST SHOW EVIDENCE/LOGIC BACKING IT UP!

YOU WERE THE ONES CLAIMING ELECTRICITY HARMS HULK. I SAY PROVE IT!

You then pathetically tried to evade my demands by asking ME EVIDENCE that he is immune to it! I gave you MY EVIDENCE which then you evaded!

Now you claim me of no limits fallacy when your original claim itself is unfounded!

A superhero is vulnerable to the same things regular humans are vulnerable to unless they've been proven to withstand that something. Or if they withstand something more powerful. Superman, for example, would be immune to a regular snake bite because he already has feats of withstanding attacks far more powerful than a snake bite.

On the other hand, Hulk has no feats of surviving any attack that's strong enough to one shot multiple leviathans or destroy acres of land with a single hit.

That's why if you want to claim he can tank Thor's lightning, you'll have to prove that he can survive something just as powerful.

Originally posted by Silent Master
LOL!!!

Jotunheim wasnt destroyed by the energy but by how the Bifrost works.

The Bifrost acts like some sort of black hole or some sort of shit like that.

I dont know the real science behind how the Bifrost was able to destroy Jotunheim but it got to do with gravity and teleportation.

If the Bifrost energy beam itself was harmful then it would desintegrate/kill those who use it. Shouldnt that be obvious?

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Jotunheim wasnt destroyed by the energy but by how the Bifrost works.

The Bifrost acts like some sort of black hole or some sort of shit like that.

I dont know the real science behind how the Bifrost was able to destroy Jotunheim but it got to do with gravity and teleportation.

If the Bifrost energy beam itself was harmful then it would desintegrate/kill those who use it. Shouldnt that be obvious?

You're just making things up at this point.

Originally posted by FrothByte
A superhero is vulnerable to the same things regular humans are vulnerable to unless they've been proven to withstand that something. Or if they withstand something more powerful. Superman, for example, would be immune to a regular snake bite because he already has feats of withstanding attacks far more powerful than a snake bite.

On the other hand, Hulk has no feats of surviving any attack that's strong enough to one shot multiple leviathans or destroy acres of land with a single hit.

That's why if you want to claim he can tank Thor's lightning, you'll have to prove that he can survive something just as powerful.

Except you cant compare a Leviathan to Hulk! Hulk is far more vulnerable than Hulk.

Also werent the Leviathans covered with Metal? Doesnt that increases the damage?

We are talking about THE HULK HERE. If you claim the hulk has a withness then you have to prove it! Else Hulk wouldnt be the Unstoppable Behemoth he is!

So, give me the evidence that electricity harms the Hulk.

Hulk has withstood Chitauri blasters, Bullets, Extre Heats, High Falls, and the Void of Space. If you want to add electricity as a kryptonite to Hulk then prove it and done.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You're just making things up at this point.

Lol no.

The Bifrost isnt a Death Star that desintegrates stuff! It is a transportation machine. Else why doesnt Thor and the users get desintegrated when using it?

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Jotunheim wasnt destroyed by the energy but by how the Bifrost works.

The Bifrost acts like some sort of black hole or some sort of shit like that.

I dont know the real science behind how the Bifrost was able to destroy Jotunheim but it got to do with gravity and teleportation.

If the Bifrost energy beam itself was harmful then it would desintegrate/kill those who use it. Shouldnt that be obvious?

This isn't a matter of being biased. This post is a flat out lie.

The Hulk didn't withstand Chitauri blasters, he was bloodied, ko'd and left under rubble from their attack.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Except you cant compare a Leviathan to Hulk! Hulk is far more vulnerable than Hulk.

Also werent the Leviathans covered with Metal? Doesnt that increases the damage?

We are talking about THE HULK HERE. If you claim the hulk has a withness then you have to prove it! Else Hulk wouldnt be the Unstoppable Behemoth he is!

So, give me the evidence that electricity harms the Hulk.

Hulk has withstood Chitauri blasters, Bullets, Extre Heats, High Falls, and the Void of Space. If you want to add electricity as a kryptonite to Hulk then prove it and done.

I see you still don't understand the concept of providing proof to back up your claims.

Show me Hulk tanking something strong enough to destroy entire city blocks with a single hit.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
This isn't a matter of being biased. This post is a flat out lie.

Most of his posts are, did you like the part where he claimed the energy from the Bi-Frost explosion was harmless?

Originally posted by FrothByte
I'm not being a troll. I'm pointing out that Thor never used his full arsenal on Hulk. Never used his most powerful tool against Hulk. That's not speculation, that's pure fact because we have proof on screen.

Originally posted by Zack Fair
Movie kindda made it obvious an all out Thor would be too much for Hulk.

Because the GM saved him.

Originally posted by TheGrat1
Thor handles Hulk easily. Hulk is just a brawling brute and too slow. Thor was treating him like a speedbag pre-lighting amp. No interference, Thor puts Hulk to sleep like Iron Man did.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
This isn't a matter of being biased. This post is a flat out lie.

Evidence?