Originally posted by Branlor Swift
I never said Spectre was the only one to cause anything. Go back and read my post.And it literally does not matter what recaps say. You're on the basis that neglecting to mention something means it never happened. Following your logic Extant was completely retconned out of the event in one retelling. And following your logic it's a complete mystery how Hal even got these powers in the first place. Which for starters on all the shit we could bring up are some pretty ****ing important details in Zero Hour. Hal just went nuts and started erasing timelines with his own power. Canon.
What Zero Hour was just the end fight then, no lead up? That's your logic here.
The fact that you're using short retellings when the original feat was longer than those with a ****ton of context should show you're barking up the wrong alley. The ****ing fact that you're basically telling me to ignore the actual comic it happened in says you're wrong.
Nothing was specifically changed in those retellings. Nothing. All there was was attention to detail missing which is to be expected when you deal with any event let alone an event of this magnitude.
This is the shadiest shit I've seen in a long time. You would cry Rao if the same was flipped around on Superman. I don't understand how you think this retcons anything when by the same logic you can retcon 99 percent of the event.
This is ****ing stupid. Straight up ass hole shitting in an ass hole level of stupid.
You're using simplified accounts of the event as to give the reader an idea of what happened and expecting that to be the true tale of what happened. That'd be like listening to Carver shorten a story over someone summarizing an event panel for panel.
You might as well just start reading summaries from the authors of their novels and vehemently stand firm in anything not happening in the summary is wrong.
"The author didn't write that whore getting gangbanged in the summary, why don't you eat a dick and then make sure to include it in a summary of your life."Also according to 52 Kyle held a full power Parallax at bay all by himself while the heroes were big banging Damage.
It's just... why do you do this? The retellings aren't wrong, they just fit the definition of lacking context. It is not telling us everything we already know from that event.
And lol at this having anything to do with me or my opinion. Yes, the writer should have consulted me for the retelling. Surely this is reliant on me. Shame on me and such and such.
You're literally ignoring crucial details from the actual comic the actual feat takes place that the retellings were based off of so you can put Superman on a pedestal. This should naturally fall on me as opposed to you."Two abstract level beings were involved in putting energy through Damage to create a big bang? Yeah maybe in the comic loser! Two seperate retellings didn't mention that so naturally that means Superman's penis is the juiciest hog around. I don't say this enough, but what a cock!"
I'm honestly suprised you don't stab Celey in his sleep with that reach.
Hey look, another essay from bran. How original! Sadly I don't have neither the patience nor the time to go through your BS "Hey let's call all recaps invalid just because I don't like it and they didn't have every minuscule information ever and that's not just ****ing stupid, it's totally inane."
You know what, I don't give a shit about what you think happened in your view. Give me a scan which says the big bang happened due to Spectre and Superman had nothing to contribute there. Until then, cry more.