Originally posted by Beniboybling
Even if we account for the fact that Sidious wasn't putting in as much effort, the fact remains that Kolar and Tinn both died before they could even swing their blades. To them he was practically invisible. And yet Savage is not only able to see Sidious move, but actually intercept his attack.
Palpatine was mostly defending. Especially in the first scan you provided; they came flying at him and he caught their attacks simultaneously, whereas Palpatine went flying at the B-team so fast that not even Windu was able to gain any advantage. In fact, he was pressed back right after his companions fell.
Originally posted by Beniboybling
That's considerably superior to the B-Teams effort, as is landing an actual blow, and I think it makes up for the difference in intent. Nor would Sidious have to tone down his speed to not kill Savage, just not exploit opening when they present themselves.
How can we conclude Savage is superior if Palpatine treated both fights differently? I think Windu's handling of Sidious's speed is sufficient enough to conclude Sidious was fighting at a far faster (far more aggressive) pace, considering Sidious was distracted by far greater numbers, and it didn't give Windu any advantage to tag Sidious, as opposed to being forced on the fleeting end. Maul and Savage were hardly forced on the defensive.
Originally posted by Beniboybling
And irrespective of what your opinions of Dave may be, his interpretation is going to be more valid than yours, and it is intepretable. Its obvious that Sidious wasn't trying as hard, but its interpretable as to whether he still surpassed the B-Team regardless.
Well Lucas's answer as to why the B-team were taken out so easily: only Yoda and Mace could compete. Considering the question was in the context on how they were taken out (Sidious lightsaber), this is solid proof that Obi Wan doesn't qualify as competition in that area, and would be downed just as fast. If we assume the bros were as good as Sidious allowed them to be, this would indicate solid saber superiority over Kenobi, which we seen first hand that Kenobi can hold his own against either on his best day.
If Filoni didn't give much thought before making the comment (and he really didn't), I have no reason to take his off hand remark seriously, especially since he had no involvement. Even in his own show, he has depicted Fisto as being on par with Kenobi.
I mean, Kenobi could barely stand up long enough when facing a serious Dooku, despite Anakin as back up ("The Lost One"😉, and I doubt you'd agree Dooku is faster than Sidious (Dooku really was outpacing Kenobi far more than Sidious was either of the bros).
Originally posted by Beniboybling
It's not exactly difficult to believe either, considering Savage has defeated two Jedi Council members already.Sure but he still pushes him back. I suppose its not that relevant considering we are discussing speed, but its impressive nonetheless.
Yeah, Savage has a solid strength advantage over majority of the council members. That's practically what gives him the edge.