McGonagall, Snape, and Bellatrix vs Voldemort
Voldmelet doesn't have his horcruxes however he isn't going to fade away.
Voldmelrt has his own wand
Morals off
Everyone in their primes
I wanted this one because these are the top three after Dumbledore and Voldmelrt. So can the trio of the second best combined defeat the greatest dark lord of all time.
Originally posted by quanchi112
So you create a thread I weigh in and you accuse me of being a fanboy.....😂
Voldemort wins. Get over it.
No I mean you don't give a reason, and based on our dumbledore vs Voldmelrt debate you defend him with everything you have even if it's not their, and just bring up points that have no bearing on it, and then beleiveing he is the most powerful character in Harry Potter. Forgive me but you have brought yourself as that.
Also this is an opinion thread. Also voldemort had trouble agaisnt with mcgonagall bellatrix and snape. Snape and Bellatrix are greater than Kingsley and Hoarace. Then he has no horcruxes or his own wand and no one to get upset with if someone gets killed.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2He has greater feats, reflexes, and a portrayal in the films than these other characters. Do not get mad Voldemort is at the top of the mountain.
No I mean you don't give a reason, and based on our dumbledore vs Voldmelrt debate you defend him with everything you have even if it's not their, and just bring up points that have no bearing on it, and then beleiveing he is the most powerful character in Harry Potter. Forgive me but you have brought yourself as that.Also this is an opinion thread. Also voldemort had trouble agaisnt with mcgonagall bellatrix and snape. Snape and Bellatrix are greater than Kingsley and Hoarace. Then he has no horcruxes or his own wand and no one to get upset with if someone gets killed.
Originally posted by quanchi112
He has greater feats, reflexes, and a portrayal in the films than these other characters. Do not get mad Voldemort is at the top of the mountain.
I mean. Reflexes really. Harry could keep up and he was caught off guard. All three of these characters are given great portrayals and then this is them combined. Voldmelrt is a th the top but not at the summit. That spot belongs to dumbledore as Supreme Emperor of all while voldemort is second. These three characters, character lesser than bellatrix and snape gave Tom trouble. So most of all his feats won't mean anything for him as he has already approached by weaker opponents than bellatrix an snape (Hoarace and Kingsley)
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2False. Voldemort always had a plot device against him. Voldemort easily disarmed Harry whereas Harry attacked him first. In gof we see Voldemort knock him down and crucio him easily. Reflexes. There's a reason Harry wasn't like hey I'll go take this guy on because everyone save you knew he was outclassed in a fair fight.
I mean. Reflexes really. Harry could keep up and he was caught off guard. All three of these characters are given great portrayals and then this is them combined. Voldmelrt is a th the top but not at the summit. That spot belongs to dumbledore as Supreme Emperor of all while voldemort is second. These three characters, character lesser than bellatrix and snape gave Tom trouble. So most of all his feats won't mean anything for him as he has already approached by weaker opponents than bellatrix an snape (Hoarace and Kingsley)
Ps. Do not bore me like in the other thread in which you repeated your same points in gigantic fashion ignoring all common sense and reason.
Originally posted by quanchi112
False. Voldemort always had a plot device against him. Voldemort easily disarmed Harry whereas Harry attacked him first. In gof we see Voldemort knock him down and crucio him easily. Reflexes. There's a reason Harry wasn't like hey I'll go take this guy on because everyone save you knew he was outclassed in a fair fight.
Excuses. 2nd Harry blocked all of his avada kedavra curses in Death
Y Hallows when he used his above average reflexes and couldn't get past him so had to apparated behind him. 3) Harry is no where near the level of the three witches and wizard. Could t anyone do that? Knock him down, take a 2-3 second pause then use crucio? Mcgonagall Kingsley and Hoarace were able to press him in their fight.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2The wand wouldn't betray it's true master. How can you miss the obvious ? That's books. Irrelevant. You pick and choose when to apply the books. Fiendfyre destroyed a horcurx in the books but you say firestorm is more powerful. Get the **** out of here. You're a hypocrite. Quit ignoring the context of the films, heathen.
Excuses. 2nd Harry blocked all of his avada kedavra curses in Death
Y Hallows when he used his above average reflexes and couldn't get past him so had to apparated behind him. 3) Harry is no where near the level of the three witches and wizard. Could t anyone do that? Knock him down, take a 2-3 second pause then use crucio? Mcgonagall Kingsley and Hoarace were able to press him in their fight.
Movie feats only. 🙂
Originally posted by quanchi112
The wand wouldn't betray it's true master. How can you miss the obvious ? That's books. Irrelevant. You pick and choose when to apply the books. Fiendfyre destroyed a horcurx in the books but you say firestorm is more powerful. Get the **** out of here. You're a hypocrite. Quit ignoring the context of the films, heathen.Movie feats only. 🙂
He still blocked it. It would have hit him it would have been game over that's fact. We all pick and chose when to apply things when they help us and harm us. Also even without the book they still have a chance as all three are regarded by their superiors as the best of the best and right below themselves. Add all three of them together and what do you get, an unstoppable fighting force. Unstoppable by one person of course. Actually wasn't the horcruxes already stabbed and the dark magic leaking out. So I mean if it destroyed a horcruxes with all the dark magic still in it than yes that would be more impressive. How am I a hypocrite. Quite overstating and examining them heathen. 😂
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2The wand wouldn't kill him unless Harry allowed it. No, you either say all facts or fair game and draw the lines. Picking and choosing is the way of biased posters. You're biased. I'm not. I go by movies alone and don't leech off the books when it helps my case. That's your thing.
He still blocked it. It would have hit him it would have been game over that's fact. We all pick and chose when to apply things when they help us and harm us. Also even without the book they still have a chance as all three are regarded by their superiors as the best of the best and right below themselves. Add all three of them together and what do you get, an unstoppable fighting force. Unstoppable by one person of course. Actually wasn't the horcruxes already stabbed and the dark magic leaking out. So I mean if it destroyed a horcruxes with all the dark magic still in it than yes that would be more impressive. How am I a hypocrite. Quite overstating and examining them heathen. 😂
Separate your paragraphs better. Your writing reminds me of an uneducated posted like kurupt. Rambling with very little substance.
Voldmelrt can beat almost any wizard in a H2H battle with the exception of dumbledore, however this is a 3v1 and all three are some of the most powerful of their age and bellatrix is thought to be second to only Voldmelrt in the ranks of the death eater and also below snape while snape and mcgonagll are on par with one another. So all three of them can definitely pull out a win however they a re going, to be exhausted and in need of recovery.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2Movies only. Who killed bellatrix again ? Ron's shitty mom. So do not overrate her in the films. Dobby also made her look quite foolish in the films. Voldemort is simply on a it her level than their film versions.
Voldmelrt can beat almost any wizard in a H2H battle with the exception of dumbledore, however this is a 3v1 and all three are some of the most powerful of their age and bellatrix is thought to be second to only Voldmelrt in the ranks of the death eater and also below snape while snape and mcgonagll are on par with one another. So all three of them can definitely pull out a win however they a re going, to be exhausted and in need of recovery.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Movies only. Who killed bellatrix again ? Ron's shitty mom. So do not overrate her in the films. Dobby also made her look quite foolish in the films. Voldemort is simply on a it her level than their film versions.
I know what did I just use? Shameful how you don't understand that battle. Molly is no where near bellatrix as in that duel bellatrix was overconfident and thus underestimated her didn't react she was supposed to. This is shown by how Molly was about to go down and was flailing once bellatrix started her assault. So no Molly is not better. Of we go by your logic than that means Harry is better than Voldemort. Voldmelrt is powerful but up against these three he will have his hands full.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2Molly straight up killed her. There was nothing to it. It was a fair fight. When two people square off in a fair fight and one wins just accept it. Fanboys like yourself make stuff up. 😂
I know what did I just use? Shameful how you don't understand that battle. Molly is no where near bellatrix as in that duel bellatrix was overconfident and thus underestimated her didn't react she was supposed to. This is shown by how Molly was about to go down and was flailing once bellatrix started her assault. So no Molly is not better. Of we go by your logic than that means Harry is better than Voldemort. Voldmelrt is powerful but up against these three he will have his hands full.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Molly straight up killed her. There was nothing to it. It was a fair fight. When two people square off in a fair fight and one wins just accept it. Fanboys like yourself make stuff up. 😂
Yes there was. She overestimated her and didn't expect her to cut lose. Why was Molly being pushed back bellatrix in the beginning then if she was better. That was bellatrix underestimating her and not defending the way she was supposed to or attacking everyone knows this. You tend to make things up, I on the other hand don't make things up. You saw the battle, it's also in bellatrix's wiki and it's common sense.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2She took her measure and then responded. Bellatrix was not able to survive. I go by the facts. Two fought in a fair duel. One destroyed the other. Your opinion is biased.
Yes there was. She overestimated her and didn't expect her to cut lose. Why was Molly being pushed back bellatrix in the beginning then if she was better. That was bellatrix underestimating her and not defending the way she was supposed to or attacking everyone knows this. You tend to make things up, I on the other hand don't make things up. You saw the battle, it's also in bellatrix's wiki and it's common sense.
Tom riddle would destroy Molly. Get the **** out of here. Tom would also wreck Bellatrix with her aid here.
Originally posted by quanchi112
She took her measure and then responded. Bellatrix was not able to survive. I go by the facts. Two fought in a fair duel. One destroyed the other. Your opinion is biased.Tom riddle would destroy Molly. Get the **** out of here. Tom would also wreck Bellatrix with her aid here.
If you go by facts than you would know that bellatrix overestimated her opponent and didn't respond accordingly. This is explained by how once Molly sent one spell out she tried to retreat than bellatrix lashed out and almost overpowered her but out of arrogance stopped and started laughing. So no Molly is not better than bellatrix and yes Molly would destroy her, that's why I put in bellatrix instead.
Bellatrix can hold her own agaisn't any wizard. Whether she can win or not is another question but she can hold her own and then she had aid from two of the most powerful witches and wizards of the age mcgonagall and snape. Voldemor is going to have his hands full.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2When does anyone allude to that ? Your interpretation isn't a fact. It also shows her incompetence even by your own conclusions. Molly killed her. Your excuse making bias isn't a fact.
If you go by facts than you would know that bellatrix overestimated her opponent and didn't respond accordingly. This is explained by how once Molly sent one spell out she tried to retreat than bellatrix lashed out and almost overpowered her but out of arrogance stopped and started laughing. So no Molly is not better than bellatrix and yes Molly would destroy her, that's why I put in bellatrix instead.Bellatrix can hold her own agaisn't any wizard. Whether she can win or not is another question but she can hold her own and then she had aid from two of the most powerful witches and wizards of the age mcgonagall and snape. Voldemor is going to have his hands full.
Dobby easily disarmed her and Molly killed her. Her killing Sirius black when he wasn't paying attention is not impressive.