Originally posted by quanchi112
It is bad as someone denying the sky is blue and screaming prove it.Then prove the armor is different. Hitting cloth isn't hitting anything organic either.
Yea that's how I feel. It's obvious he didn't do it by magic, but you keep saying yes he did. Where your prof.
Armor, has been shown to take a LIGHTSBAER hit. Clothes have shown to get torn through by a simple wand.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2We see him use his wand to clearly cut him via magic.
Yea that's how I feel. It's obvious he didn't do it by magic, but you keep saying yes he did. Where your prof.Armor, has been shown to take a LIGHTSBAER hit. Clothes have shown to get torn through by a simple wand.
Ak doesn't do any phayial damage it just kills the person this the attacks are t comparable at all.
😂
Originally posted by quanchi112
We see him use his wand to clearly cut him via magic.Ak doesn't do any phayial damage it just kills the person this the attacks are t comparable at all.
😂
We see him do a slashing motion. That's all we see. We don't see any magic use.
Again we don't know how it will react to armor. Especially when there's no organic tissue behind isn't. When AK is used on clothes, the clothes have organic parts behind them. Vader's hands doesn't.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2We see his wand doesn't cut him so it's magic in the same way tk is used. We see the results not the magic, boy.
We see him do a slashing motion. That's all we see. We don't see any magic use.Again we don't know how it will react to armor. Especially when there's no organic tissue behind isn't. When AK is used on clothes, the clothes have organic parts behind them. Vader's hands doesn't.
If you are saying we don't know how it will react then you just crushed your own point. Baseless claim. Ak wins based off how it works.
Originally posted by quanchi112
We see his wand doesn't cut him so it's magic in the same way tk is used. We see the results not the magic, boy.If you are saying we don't know how it will react then you just crushed your own point. Baseless claim. Ak wins based off how it works.
No we don't. We see him make a cutting motion. Camera goes to Voldemort. Once he cuts, camera goes back to snape. That's because there was no magic used.
You obviously don't know how debating works. We don't know how it will affect Vader due to his suit and lack of living tissue.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2When he moves his wand he uses magic he doesn't go around cutting people with his wand. 😂
No we don't. We see him make a cutting motion. Camera goes to Voldemort. Once he cuts, camera goes back to snape. That's because there was no magic used.You obviously don't know how debating works. We don't know how it will affect Vader due to his suit and lack of living tissue.
We see it work on hitting clothes which isn't living tissue either. You made the claim which you admitted is baseless.
Originally posted by quanchi112
When he moves his wand he uses magic he doesn't go around cutting people with his wand. 😂We see it work on hitting clothes which isn't living tissue either. You made the claim which you admitted is baseless.
Guess what, we see all the spells he uses as well. We see the spell, and movement and the result. The difference is we see him within distance of snape to cut him, and no sort of magic there.
I said the tissue behind the clothes. Pay attention. Clothes aren't nearly as protective. When has Avada Kedavra ever taken someone down in armor?
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2We know when he gestures his wand he uses magic he doesn't cut. We see him tk away Harry's wand without seeing magic physically do so.
Guess what, we see all the spells he uses as well. We see the spell, and movement and the result. The difference is we see him within distance of snape to cut him, and no sort of magic there.I said the tissue behind the clothes. Pay attention. Clothes aren't nearly as protective. When has Avada Kedavra ever taken someone down in armor?
The clothes are not burned through so there goes your point.
Originally posted by quanchi112
When he moves his wand he uses magic he doesn't go around cutting people with his wand. 😂We see it work on hitting clothes which isn't living tissue either. You made the claim which you admitted is baseless.
Repeating the same thing over and ove shows you don't have evidence.
Again you would have to prove that AK works on armor. Really it wouldn't work. Best thing to hope for would be to make him explode or something this is proven by the stone in Goblet of Fire and Deathly Hallows. The best it does is take some of it off. This is futuristic technology, more durable than stone that has been around for x amount of years.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2you made the claim despite the mountain of evidence that says otherwise.
Repeating the same thing over and ove shows you don't have evidence.Again you would have to prove that AK works on armor. Really it wouldn't work. Best thing to hope for would be to make him explode or something this is proven by the stone in Goblet of Fire and Deathly Hallows. The best it does is take some of it off. This is futuristic technology, more durable than stone that has been around for x amount of years.
No, I don't have to disprove your claim you need to prove it works differently on armor.
The fl which hasn't even killed Luke despite a long time under it killed Vader despite the technology. Star Wars isn't futuristic technology it's happened in the past. Star Trek is the future, boy.
Originally posted by quanchi112
you made the claim despite the mountain of evidence that says otherwise.No, I don't have to disprove your claim you need to prove it works differently on armor.
The fl which hasn't even killed Luke despite a long time under it killed Vader despite the technology. Star Wars isn't futuristic technology it's happened in the past. Star Trek is the future, boy.
Mountain first off means more than one, and you don't even have that.
I have. Reread the stone comparison.
Where did all of this come into play? This is just something you pulled out your butt again. So humans have flying cars, lightsabers, entire suits that do what Vader does, holograms to that point, day to day civilian interstellar flight, galactic wide trade, galactic wide military, use laser guns like the clones and droids do on an average basis to whe that all we use, hyper speed, technology such as the malevolence, shielded tanks and so much more. All of that are things we dream of, while Star Wars uses this on a daily basis.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2Wands performing magic despite no energy being shown.
Mountain first off means more than one, and you don't even have that.I have. Reread the stone comparison.
Where did all of this come into play? This is just something you pulled out your butt again. So humans have flying cars, lightsabers, entire suits that do what Vader does, holograms to that point, day to day civilian interstellar flight, galactic wide trade, galactic wide military, use laser guns like the clones and droids do on an average basis to whe that all we use, hyper speed, technology such as the malevolence, shielded tanks and so much more. All of that are things we dream of, while Star Wars uses this on a daily basis.
The stone wasn't connected and when did he shout the words ?
I cited facts and you claim ridiculousness. A time long ago and their progression isn't dynamic it's a static place.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Wands performing magic despite no energy being shown.The stone wasn't connected and when did he shout the words ?
I cited facts and you claim ridiculousness. A time long ago and their progression isn't dynamic it's a static place.
There's indication of magic being shown though.
No, but all it really did was break a small to medium sized piece. Vader's suit is much more durable than stone and his hand isn't connected to anything organic either. It's a complete bionic hand.
I've also cited facts. Point out all the things I listed that exist in this world that we see on a daily constant basis. Again it's futuristic to us because those are things we dream of doing. Star Wars and Star Trek are futuristic to us. To them that's a constant basis.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2Just like with tk.
There's indication of magic being shown though.No, but all it really did was break a small to medium sized piece. Vader's suit is much more durable than stone and his hand isn't connected to anything organic either. It's a complete bionic hand.
I've also cited facts. Point out all the things I listed that exist in this world that we see on a daily constant basis. Again it's futuristic to us because those are things we dream of doing. Star Wars and Star Trek are futuristic to us. To them that's a constant basis.
Again when the Ak hits a person the clothing isn't damaged,.
Star Wars doesn't progress whereas Star Trek evolves constantly.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2I just listed another example of no magic save the wand moving and the effects. You can't even grasp what I say. You're an idiot.
So you agree no indication of magic is there.Again clothing isn't armor.
It's progressed from us that's the point.
Prove the difference then.
Star Wars hasn't progressed at all to itself whereas Star Trek has progressed from itself. Again you don't grasp the points.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I just listed another example of no magic save the wand moving and the effects. You can't even grasp what I say. You're an idiot.Prove the difference then.
Star Wars hasn't progressed at all to itself whereas Star Trek has progressed from itself. Again you don't grasp the points.
No what you say just doesn't matter. I don't get why you don't grasp this simple concept. Oh yes I do. Your dumb.
Vader's suit has been shown to take a LIGHTSBAER hit, and lightning, while Luke who was wearing clothes was shocked and in pain. Blasters even go through clones with armor on. Vader raises his hand, and if we go by what you say his suit tanked the blaster bolts.
To its self. I'm talking about to us. Why don't you get that.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2So you concede the point by avoiding it.
No what you say just doesn't matter. I don't get why you don't grasp this simple concept. Oh yes I do. Your dumb.Vader's suit has been shown to take a LIGHTSBAER hit, and lightning, while Luke who was wearing clothes was shocked and in pain. Blasters even go through clones with armor on. Vader raises his hand, and if we go by what you say his suit tanked the blaster bolts.
To its self. I'm talking about to us. Why don't you get that.
Prove the Ak has to destroy the clothes to kill the person.
You don't make any sense. Your sentences are jumbled atrocities to the English language. Slap yourself.
Originally posted by quanchi112
So you concede the point by avoiding it.Prove the Ak has to destroy the clothes to kill the person.
You don't make any sense. Your sentences are jumbled atrocities to the English language. Slap yourself.
You didn't prove anything. You can tell when Voldemort uses magic. That was not one of those moments.
That's your point to prove. I was asked to prove that armor is different from clothes which was quite easy.
The fact you don't get that shows how illiterate you are. I'll put it in a way you will understand. We don't have flying cars, or space shuttles that go into space on a daily basis, or hyperspace. Star Wars does. Futuristic. Do you get it now?
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2So you concede the point by saying you can tell. 😂
You didn't prove anything. You can tell when Voldemort uses magic. That was not one of those moments.That's your point to prove. I was asked to prove that armor is different from clothes which was quite easy.
The fact you don't get that shows how illiterate you are. I'll put it in a way you will understand. We don't have flying cars, or space shuttles that go into space on a daily basis, or hyperspace. Star Wars does. Futuristic. Do you get it now?
No, you made the claim. Prove it.
I compared each franchise to itself and Star Wars doesn't progress whereas Star Trek does.
😂