Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Probably because "Communism" has either enslaved or killed far more people then the Nazis and Confederates COMBINED! [/B]
Oh, come on. If this isn't a joke, I really do not know what to say. It's more than a stretch to say that "communism" enslaved or killed people.
Originally posted by The Lost
Oh, come on. If this isn't a joke, I really do not know what to say. It's more than a stretch to say that "communism" enslaved or killed people.
Communist regimes that used the aforementioned symbols enslaved and killed people. Nazism, per se, did not kill people either.
GWTW is racist as phuck.
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xmj41u_chicken-from-gone-with-the-wind-1939_shortfilms
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Is Dukes of Hazard racist?
Just like Inglorious Basterds wasn't Anti-Semetic just because it has Swastikas in it. With fiction it all depends on how something is used and treated. Smoking for instance, it's okay to have a character smoking, even if the character is a hero as long as that's just part of that character's personality (and especially if smoking is shown as a vice/addiction, not just something cool with no consequences), but it would be another thing entirely if that character started preaching the merits of kids smoking early in life.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Is Dukes of Hazard racist?
Robtard is correct.
And an actor from the show said that there was never any racism in Hazzard town.
http://www.ew.com/article/2015/06/24/dukes-hazzard-ben-jones-confederate-flag
Buuuuuuuuuuut!
I think it is tough sell to justify the Confederate flag as the "indomitable spirit of the South."
I guess I could start wearing the Swastika as a symbol of the Third Reich's amazing innovations in technology? 😐
Originally posted by Robtard
Come on, Shaky. You can like the movie for it's acting and scenery all you like, but to pretend like it doesn't try and romanticize slavery in the South is silly. It's a racist flick based off a racist book.
I'm not pretending anything. It is a book of it's time. If we forget the past we are bond to repeat it.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I'm not pretending anything. It is a book of it's time. If we forget the past we are bond to repeat it.
It's an incorrect portrayal of a time-period. Slavery was in fact a horrible thing for slaves and an ugly facet of America.
And I'm not for banding it outright, it has its place in cinematic history. Just understand its sensitive nature and don't screen it where it's not appropriate.