Supreme Court Rules Same-Sex Marriage a Right (5-4)

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
do you consider anal sex to be biological intercourse?

you dont have to answer that. we all know you're dumb.

You understand what 'intercourse' means?

Women cannot have intercourse with each other (vaginal and anal). Yes, they can lick body parts and catch HIV related diseases in this manner if one of the partners is infected. However, they are less likely to become infected then homosexual and/or bisexual men.

And you better not label others as dumb because you are dumb yourself. Not long ago, you thought that incest is not possible among adults. Here is the gem:

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
a child is not legally capable of consent. this is already law.

You dumb person.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Marriage between males and females is most productive for a human society. Enabling other forms of marriages may result in reduction of heterosexuality and their would be additional implications that are not generally accounted for.

I would think the only way marriage between a man and a woman would ever be the most productive thing for human society would be if that society was in serious danger of going extinct and needed as many people to reproduce as possible.

But that is not the case. Since we are not in danger of going extinct the most important thing is the ability to competently raise children. You can successfully raise a child with two parents of the same gender.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Anal sex is also known as anal intercourse.

You understand what 'intercourse' means?

Women cannot have intercourse with each other (vaginal and anal). Yes, they can lick body parts and catch HIV related diseases in this manner if one of the partners is infected. However, they are less likely to become infected then homosexual and/or bisexual men.

And you better not label others as dumb because you are dumb yourself. Not long ago, you thought that incest is not possible among adults.

so you're special made-up definition for 'intercourse' is 'to put one's penis inside something'. wow you're dumb.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Some of these opinions I can't believe still exist in today's day and age. I can't believe you're serious.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
so you're special made-up definition for 'intercourse' is 'to put one's penis inside something'. wow you're dumb.

sexual contact between individuals involving penetration, especially the insertion of a man's erect penis into a woman's vagina, typically culminating in orgasm and the ejaculation of semen.

You have now proven yourself to be a dumb person! Congrats.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Definition of sexual intercourse:

sexual contact between individuals involving penetration, especially the insertion of a man's erect penis into a woman's vagina, typically culminating in orgasm and the ejaculation of semen.

You have now proven yourself to be a dumb person! Congrats.

So any penetration. Two women having sex by inserting fingers would count in your definition.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Definition of sexual intercourse:

[I]sexual contact between individuals involving penetration,

so fingering is included, which bi-women, lesbians, and straight women tend to enjoy. see the point yet? nah you're too dumb, aren't you?

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Definition of sexual intercourse:

sexual contact between individuals involving penetration, especially the insertion of a man's erect penis into a woman's vagina, typically culminating in orgasm and the ejaculation of semen.

You have now proven yourself to be a dumb person! Congrats.

Full Definition of SEXUAL INTERCOURSE

1: heterosexual intercourse involving penetration of the vagina by the penis : coitus

2: intercourse (as anal or oral intercourse) that does not involve penetration of the vagina by the penis

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sexual%20intercourse

I believe you owe Bashar an apology.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
so fingering is included, which bi-women, lesbians, and straight women tend to enjoy. see the point yet? nah you're too dumb, aren't you?

Originally posted by Robtard

I believe you owe Basher an apology.

*holding breath in anticipation*

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
You have anything productive to contribute or just spout labels at others?

say something that isnt completely dumb and i'll won't point out how dumb you are.

Originally posted by Bardock42
ide

So, at any rate, since there's no issue with increased chance of STDs like with heterosexual and male homosexual couples you are in favour of female homosexual's marrying?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
say something that isnt completely dumb and i'll won't point out how dumb you are.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
I think this is a question it's worth LeGend answering. So could we have one?

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
You don't get to throw labels at people for having different views then yours. You need to learn about manners.

you're spamming misinformation and outright lies while ignoring anyone who points out your error. i dont have to respect that, nor should anyone. 👆

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
you're spamming misinformation and outright lies while ignoring anyone who points out your error. i dont have to respect that, nor should anyone. 👆

You deny the fact that homosexual and bisexual men are most vulnerable to HIV related diseases?

You may disagree with a point, but you should not verbally assault a person. As I said, learn some manners. Otherwise, stay out of the debate.

Originally posted by Robtard
Like many angry gay hating men, he probably doesn't have much (or as much) of a problem with lesbians. FFS, he doesn't even think they actually have sex.

Funny that he's ignoring the question though...

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD

Cited points are not misinformation. You deny the fact that homosexual and bisexual men are most vulnerable to HIV related diseases?

You need to get a life.

nah you're just a hateful bigot with nothing to support his ridiculous claims, and you continue proving your complete lack of reading comprehension skills with every bit of 'evidence' you cite. 👆

Originally posted by Beniboybling
But the Bible says! 🙄

Funny that he's ignoring the question though...

If Jesus were here today, he would have lambasted Scalia and those other three SC justices for being haters.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
nah you're just a hateful bigot with nothing to support his ridiculous claims, and you continue proving your complete lack of reading comprehension skills with every bit of 'evidence' you cite. 👆

You pathetic scum, you need to hold your tongue now. Their is a limit to my tolerance.

Now, explain this gem:

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
a child is not legally capable of consent. this is already law.

What does this have to do with my point about legalization of incest among adults?

Main argument in support of homosexuality is "consent."

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Again with the verbal assault?

You pathetic scum, you need to hold your tongue now. Their is a limit to my tolerance.

Now, explain this gem:

lol wut