Originally posted by Robtard👆
If Jesus were here today, he would have lambasted Scalia and those other three SC justices for being haters.
Really its a shame Christianity is tarnished in being used to support nonsense like this.
Originally posted by S_W_LeGenDI'm guessing it stops at homosexuals?
Their is a limit to my tolerance.
Originally posted by Beniboybling
👆Really its a shame Christianity is tarnished in being used to support nonsense like this.
Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Issue with Christianity is that it is modified according to whims of the people with passage of time. Their was an Old Testament and now their is a New Testament. Its no longer an authentic religion.
christianity is not an 'authentic' religion? wow you're dumb.
you just lost all potential white knights with that one.
Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
What does this have to do with my point about legalization of incest among adults?Main argument in support of homosexuality is "consent."
As pointed out already, incest can have some serious complications with offspring, genetics and that.
The main argument of support of same-sex marriage is equality.
Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Issue with Christianity is that it is modified according to whims of the people with passage of time. Their was an Old Testament and now their is a New Testament. Its no longer an authentic religion.
Let me help you:
-The Old Testament is the Christian name for all books of the Jewish Bible.
-The New Testament is the teachings of Jesus.
-Together they form the Christian Religion.
Just curious, are you a Muslim?
Originally posted by DarthAnt66
lmfao ^
In case of Christian Bible, their is an Old Testament and New Testament.
Also, look at the number of authors: https://carm.org/when-was-bible-written-and-who-wrote-it
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
christianity is not an 'authentic' religion? wow you're dumb.you just lost all potential white knights with that one.
Issue with Christianity is that it is modified according to whims of the people with passage of time. Their was an Old Testament and now their is a New Testament. Its no longer an authentic religion.
Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Also, look at the number of authors: https://carm.org/when-was-bible-written-and-who-wrote-it
Originally posted by Robtard
His attack of Christianity seems like a clever distraction to distract away from the ridiculous anti-gay comments he's made.
So where do we draw the line?
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
bigotry in any form is disgusting. i hope our christian friends and peers will not allow s_w_legend's ignorant statements to reflect upon us all.
While pointing a finger at me, look at yourself in the mirror.
Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
I have pointed out medical implications of promoting homosexuality and bisexuality. You (and some others) dismissed this reasoning as being insufficient to stop promotion of these acts. Ironically, you use the same argument (i.e. medical implications) to discourage promotion of incestuous relationships.So where do we draw the line?
Incorrect, here's how it went down:
You brought in HIV statistics that have absolutely nothing to do with marriage equality. If anything, gay men (highest risk of HIV) getting married to each other might lower the promiscuity rate and therefore possibly lower HIV transmission rates. But who knows.
You then started attacking Christianity as a "not authentic" religion in hopes it would distract away from your thinly veiled hatred of homosexuals.
LeGenD I assume you missed all of these arguments that addressed important areas you chose to ignore. I'm sure it was a mistake, so I'm requoting them for you to answer.
Originally posted by Selenial
*sigh*The Laws of the Old Testament were set forth by God, through Jesus as the rules that Hebrews needed to follow to atone for the sins of Adam and Eve. They had to do a number of things that no Christian today has to do, as well. They even had to make sacrifices. This was all to atone for the original sin.
When Jesus came from heaven, he came forth with the express intention to sacrifice himself and wipe the sins of humanity clean. It was supposed to free humanity from former rules and regulations and allow us into heaven. That's why Christians no longer must circumsize sons or sacrifice unto God. It's why they're allowed to cut their hair.
Quoting Leviticus is saying that you believe Jesus was wrong. That Jesus' sacrifice means nothing. Saint Paul disagrees, but really Legend, are you trying to say that women who dare sleep with a man before marriage should be stoned on the streets? That we should sacrifice in the name of the Lord? The bible is beyond centuries old, and the Human Race is ever evolving. What matters is Christianity is founded on the basis of compassion and kindness. Why hold hate in your heart for people who share different views?
How about you follow the advice of an actual religious leader anyway, Pope Francis is the head of the Catholic Faith on Earth, and had this to say:
"If a person is gay and seeks God and has good will, who am I to judge?"
Originally posted by Bardock42
ideSo, at any rate, since there's no issue with increased chance of STDs like with heterosexual and male homosexual couples you are in favour of female homosexual's marrying?
Originally posted by Surtur
I would think the only way marriage between a man and a woman would ever be the most productive thing for human society would be if that society was in serious danger of going extinct and needed as many people to reproduce as possible.But that is not the case. Since we are not in danger of going extinct the most important thing is the ability to competently raise children. You can successfully raise a child with two parents of the same gender.
Originally posted by Robtard
Full Definition of SEXUAL INTERCOURSE1: heterosexual intercourse involving penetration of the vagina by the penis : coitus
2: intercourse (as anal or oral intercourse) that does not involve penetration of the vagina by the penis
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sexual%20intercourse
I believe you owe Bashar an apology.