Originally posted by psycho gundam
@bentleyYou posted a split second before I did and the quote function doesn't seem to work consistently and I was too lazy then to fix it.
Anyway, about to post now. weekend takes precedence. Actually speaking of that for me at least like...3 posts max is enough. 3 or so posts and/or a couple days span of debating.
Well I've only got one post left now, I'll wait for you to reply to anything then make my last "arguments" not too long after.
yeah, that type of lame-ness hasn't gone on in quite some time, so hoping no one's pulling that old stunt. i remembered it happened once, a long while back, and the other person was allowed to make a post anyway, just because the tactic was so cheap. i'm sure an allowance could be made again should it appear that is the case this time around....
Originally posted by Scoobless
I just prefer not going over a +1 limit on posts, if he has one, I can post two, but I want go +2, especially for the last post, it leaves you more vulnerable and you can't call out the mistakes, lies or misinterpretations of your opponent
That's right. Can't have the judges forgetting YOUR lies and misinterpretations. Those are the important ones.
😉
lol i'm not looking for respect or credit. just feels a little like celey's bz'ing both of us. what you're doing's not against the rules, just doesn't quite feel right to me is all. course, maybe you'd have found all the same material i did, but quoting me against him? hmm, that's something brand new and doesn't quite square with me.