Iranian Agreement goes through

Started by Time-Immemorial41 pages
Originally posted by Tzeentch
Putting this in my profile for later.

Why cause you caught up in the aura of Bush/Hilary? 😆

I actually kinda like Rubio and Carson too so I might be tempted to vote for either of them if they win.

Anyways back on topic this deal stinks and ensures nuclear war.

It delays Iran creating nuclear weapons and involves them in international discourse, which in the long wrong will be the most likely way to ensure that there won't be nuclear war.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Anyways back on topic this deal stinks and ensures nuclear war.

I understand if you don't like it, as you hold that "evil Iran" mentally, but don't think saying "ensures nuclear war" is maybe just a tad over-reactionary?

Originally posted by Bardock42
It delays Iran creating nuclear weapons and involves them in international discourse, which in the long wrong will be the most likely way to ensure that there won't be nuclear war.

You support the deal😂

Flip flop, earlier "I never said I did."

Originally posted by Robtard
I understand if you don't like it, as you hold that "evil Iran" mentally, but don't think saying "ensures nuclear war" is maybe just a tad over-reactionary?

So you didn't know Iran is getting $150 billion dollars which in proportion to their economy would be 8 trillion here in the uS.

You also didn't know they are missle systems from Russia?

You also refuse to accept they will not allow US inspectors in and that they will conduct their own inspections.

They will still have access to all their centerfuges?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
You support the deal😂

Flip flop, earlier "I never said I did."

You said I said it was a "good deal". Which I hadn't said, you can't just claim people say things they didn't say.

You agreeing with the deal means you think it's a good deal.

Agreeing with a deal doesn't mean he thinks its a good deal.

Compliance is agreement.

Keeping your mouth shut about the shortcomings is agreement.

What happened to

"No deal is better then a bad deal."

That went right out the window. Washington is in complete disarray dealing with this bad deal. Yet people here say "hey it's ok."

I don't think it was a terrible deal. It was a "meh" deal. Whether or not it was better than no deal, I could not say.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
So you didn't know Iran is getting $150 billion dollars which in proportion to their economy would be 8 trillion here in the uS.

You also didn't know they are missle systems from Russia?

You also refuse to accept they will not allow US inspectors in and that they will conduct their own inspections.

They will still have access to all their centerfuges?

Oh boy.

No, Iran is not getting "150billion". Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/treasury-iran-150-billion-nuclear-deal_55b8dc41e4b0224d88348e1c

Huh? Are you talking about the European missile defense system talks? You lost me there.

As pointed out, there will still be outside oversight, compared to the zero oversight pre deal.

Was that supposed to be a question? Last I read, they're losing some as part of the deal.

Oh boy

Iran will be inspecting their own.

They will be getting $150 of Santorum relief.

They are buying anti missle defense.

As pointed out, no, the sanctions being lifted will not net then 150billion

As pointed out, no, it will not just be Iran inspecting Iran

Ah, okay, what's your problem with Iran building a missile defense for themselves? They're a soverign country and not the US' whippingboy

If they could be trusted ok, when they say they are going to wipe Israel off the map and chant death to America, when they write books and publish them on how to destroy Israel and outwit America.

I think TI is talking about the air defense system, unless there's another deal in the works separate from the S-300 sale that I haven't heard about.

That's the one, and btw where have you been. This is your thread I been keeping up.

I had work stuff today, and then really bad traffic.