Iranian Agreement goes through

Originally posted by Bentley
Those countries did not have any internal opposition which is something Iran posseses in spades. S

Exactly

Nearly 200 generals and admirals send message to Congress that they should vote down the deal with Iran.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/iran-nuclear-deal-national-security-congress/2015/08/26/id/672071/?ns_mail_uid=94127627&ns_mail_job=16334

Originally posted by Star428
Nearly 200 generals and admirals send message to Congress that they should vote down the deal with Iran.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/iran-nuclear-deal-national-security-congress/2015/08/26/id/672071/?ns_mail_uid=94127627&ns_mail_job=16334

"It also was signed by retired Vice Adm. John Poindexter and retired Maj. Gen. Richard Secord, who were involved in the Iran-contra affair in the Reagan administration, in which arms were sold to Iran to fund the contras in Nicaragua."

LOL

I'm sure those two know best.

Originally posted by Bardock42
"It also was signed by retired Vice Adm. John Poindexter and retired Maj. Gen. Richard Secord, who were involved in the Iran-contra affair in the Reagan administration, in which arms were sold to Iran to fund the contras in Nicaragua."

LOL

I thought you believed in democracy. Those 200 generals outnumber the three who want it.

Keep your story straight on what you tell us you believe in, because it changes by the day.

You realize the military doesn't enact policy, yeah?

Cleary you thought so Rob based on this post.

Originally posted by Robtard
I'm sure those two know best.

Quit doing flip flops.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
I thought you believed in democracy. Those 200 generals outnumber the three who want it.

Keep your story straight on what you tell us you believe in, because it changes by the day.

I think you are mistaking democracy for military dictatorship....

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Cleary you thought so Rob based on this post.

Quit doing flip flops.

My comment to B42's post was joining in the hilarity of two people who illegally gave weapons to Iran are now against dealing with Iran.

The positives for this deal is Europe will have to police more, because they are in closer range of Iran's missiles. I am hoping the US can walk away from this horrible deal and make it EU's problem.

One less area we have to police.

Question: If the deal gets voted down (and it might), what's to stop Iran from building these nukes you're sure they'd build?

The sanctions and squeezing them till their people over throw their radical government, which they will. The people hate their government, this deal gives their government more power then ever. Economically as well as militaristically.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
The sanctions and squeezing them till their people over throw their radical government, which they will. The people hate their government, this deal gives their government more power then ever. Economically as well as militaristically.

People have been saying that since about 1979, so please don't hold your breath waiting. You'll just turn blue and look silly.

You should look at this: http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/iran/overview

"Iran is the second largest economy in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region after Saudi Arabia, with an estimated Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of US$D 406.3 billion in 2014."

Originally posted by Robtard
People have been saying that since about 1979, so please don't hold your breath waiting.

if we do the same thing over and over, we're bound to get a different result.

Originally posted by Robtard
People have been saying that since about 1979, so please don't hold your breath waiting. You'll just turn blue and look silly.

You should look at this: http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/iran/overview

"Iran is the second largest economy in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region after Saudi Arabia, with an estimated Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of US$D 406.3 billion in 2014."

You attitude is a bad deal is better then no deal.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
You attitude is a bad deal is better then no deal.

"Bad deal" is subjective, not everyone thinks it's bad, just that it could be better in varying degrees.

No deal means Iran can freely pursue those nukes you're absolutely certain they're going to make and start WWIII with.

Originally posted by Robtard
"Bad deal" is subjective, not everyone thinks it's bad, just that it could be better in varying degrees.

No deal means Iran can freely pursue those nukes you're absolutely certain they're going to make and start WWIII with.

Try reading the Quran some time.

LOL. This deal actually makes it easier for Iran to get nukes much sooner. They could have them probably in 10 years or even less now. TI is right. No deal is better than bad deal and anyone who isn't mentally challenged should be able to see this is a very bad one.

They still cant get the part that Iran gets to inspect themselves and can delay on the inspections up to 3 months from the UN and the international community.

Originally posted by Star428
LOL. This deal actually makes it easier for Iran to get nukes much sooner. They could have them probably in 10 years or even less now. TI is right. No deal is better than bad deal and anyone who isn't mentally challenged should be able to see this is a very bad one.