Originally posted by dadudemon
You're supposed to. And, in fact, if you don't, you can end up plagiarizing yourself.http://www.slideshare.net/khornberger/citing-yourself-citing-your-previous-work-in-mla-or-apa-format
Quote it, say who said it. Cite it if appropriate.
But would you take yourself to court?
No covering this up with Rhetoric
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
a site dedicated entirely to pro-life propaganda. why would they lie? 👆did you ever consider that maybe you really want these conspiracies to be true, and this naked bias clouded your judgement?
Here is an entirely unbiased article.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/421888/planned-parenthood-videos-abortion-taxpayer-subsidies
Originally posted by AbnormalButSane
Ahaha, the NAF is pursuing charges against the anti-abortion group who used illegal means to access the undercover video.Serves them right for wasting everyone's time and fear mongering.
Congress is going to defund PP, so I doubt this goes anywhere and if it does, will be tired up in litigation for years and nothing will come of it. 😆
Obviously congress does not think it was a waste of time, unless you assume they are acting blindly off just a video and not their own investigation.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Congress is going to defund PP, so I doubt this goes anywhere and if it does, will be tired up in litigation for years and nothing will come of it. 😆Obviously congress does not think it was a waste of time, unless you assume they are acting blindly off just a video and not their own investigation.
They did do an investigation and found that PP had done nothing wrong. 🤨
Since you like fox news:
Am I missing something? Do you have information that the rest of the public doesn't have? 🤨
Originally posted by AbnormalButSane
Since you like fox news:Am I missing something? Do you have information that the rest of the public doesn't have? 🤨
Thats one state governor. What does that have to do with congress?
If they try to defund the PP, the president could just veto the legislation.
And why in the world would you and anyone else want to defund the PP? It's one of the only organizations in the country actually helping to reduce the number of abortions in this country, reduces the spread of STDs, and is important the detection of malignant cancers.
It makes no sense.
Originally posted by AbnormalButSane
If they try to defund the PP, the president could just veto the legislation.And why in the world would you and anyone else want to defund the PP? It's one of the only organizations in the country actually helping to reduce the number of abortions in this country, reduces the spread of STDs, and is important the detection of malignant cancers.
It makes no sense.
I have no problem with PP, as long as they are following the law.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
I have no problem with PP, as long as they are following the law.
Nothing has been shown that they are not following the law.
Originally posted by Robtard
Because PP supports the concept that women have a claim to their own bodies and what happens or doesnt happen to said bodies and that scares/enrages some people.
qft