Originally posted by Bardock42
Doubt it, gun nuts are all talk really.
That's real funny coming from a guy in Germany who just sits on his ass lecturing Americans all the time on our gun laws and giving lame-ass suggestions on how to live our lives as if we give two shits about your two-cent opinion. You're no better, dude, and have no room to talk.
Originally posted by Star428
That's real funny coming from a guy in Germany who just sits on his ass lecturing Americans all the time on our gun laws and giving lame-ass suggestions on how to live our lives as if we give two shits about your two-cent opinion. You're no better, dude, and have no room to talk.
Nah
Originally posted by psmith81992
More regulated? Yes... Stoic is not saying that though. He's saying civilians should not have firearms. That's dumb.
Indeed, it is. I've posted this before but here it is again for people who have forgotten or never seen it:
http://www.teapartytribune.com/2013/01/05/what-happens-when-governments-disarm-their-citizens/
I'm sure that in response to the article in that link that liberals will say something like "he's lying" or "tea party links don't count" or some other nonsense. Obviously, only links to their biased liberal websites counts and all other websites have no validity. 🙄
Originally posted by Star428
Indeed, it is. I've posted this before but here it is again for people who have forgotten or never seen it:http://www.teapartytribune.com/2013/01/05/what-happens-when-governments-disarm-their-citizens/
I'm sure that in response to the article in that link that liberals will say something like "he's lying" or "tea party links don't count" or some other nonsense. Obviously, only links to their biased liberal websites counts and all other websites have no validity. 🙄
...and obviously there are other reasons besides having guns than just protection from an out-of-control government. Although that is one of the major ones. Others, for example, are protection from common thugs, criminals, or terrorists. I posted a link to an article in the "Bad Ammo" thread that shows it's been proven ISIS was operating a base not far from Texas. You can rest assured since they have a base that close that sleeper agents are already in the country. Anyone who thinks they or common thugs/criminals will be good law-abiding criminals and turn in their weapons like everybody else needs a reality check.
Originally posted by Star428I remember that article you posted and it did not give any actual proof of the ISIS base.
...and obviously there are other reasons besides having guns than just protection from an out-of-control government. Although that is one of the major ones. Others, for example, are protection from common thugs, criminals, or terrorists. I posted a link to an article in the "Bad Ammo" thread that shows it's been proven ISIS was operating a base not far from Texas. You can rest assured since they have a base that close that sleeper agents are already in the country. Anyone who thinks they or common thugs/criminals will be good law-abiding criminals and turn in their weapons like everybody else needs a reality check.
Also simply having an armed citizenry does not equate to being able to control government. It takes more than that to fight a government. You should also list all the countries that have severe or total gun control bans like the UK.
Speaking of drones I know someone who has one. Not a military drone obviously, they use it to take pictures and had it up in the clouds on the 4th of July taking photo's of fireworks at interesting angles.
He is a civilian, so it makes me wonder how long until we have civilians hooking up guns or other weapons to the drones they can buy? Since he already modded the drone(not for guns) but I'm thinking someone clever enough could probably rig something up.
Originally posted by Robtard
Red Dawn taught us that real Americans can take on a military force.
We talking about drones and civil unrest when this has nothing to do with that? Funny how the SC shooting happens and everyone is on point and keeping it real, screaming racism, this happens to the military and it turns into this quack talk? What this guy did was no better.
I don't think anyone's made light of the shootings here. But so far, we can probably rule out racism as being the motive. Most sources are claiming this guy was a nice/regular guy, then he went to the ME for a length of time and came back changed.
Considering he attacked a military installation and killed military personal, I wouldn't be surprised if some anti-American person(s) got to him and convinced him it was his Muslim duty to kill. Like those predators do to the numerous young men they convince to strap bombs to themselves in the name of religion, even though they're cowardly chicken-hawks who won't do it themselves.
Originally posted by Robtard
I don't think anyone's made light of the shootings here. But so far, we can probably rule out racism as being the motive. Most sources are claiming this guy was a nice/regular guy, then he went to the ME for a length of time and came back changed.Considering he attacked a military installation and killed military personal, I wouldn't be surprised if some anti-American person(s) got to him and convinced him it was his Muslim duty to kill. Like those predators do to the numerous young men they convince to strap bombs to themselves in the name of religion, even though they're cowardly chicken-hawks who won't do it themselves.
I agree, I just find it funny that the normal liberal crowd here piles all over SC shooting and Michael Brown killing, but really does not have much to say here.
But of coarse, why would they.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
I agree, I just find it funny that the normal liberal crowd here piles all over SC shooting and Michael Brown killing, but really does not have much to say here.But of coarse, why would they.
(2) you're still not getting why the Mike Brown killing and the Charleston shooting are the hotbed issues they are. Islamist-motivated attacks on the USA and US military personel have only been a phenomenon for the last 20 years, whereas attacks on black churches and extrajudicial killings of young black men go back centuries. They're also much more common than Islamist terrorist attacks, and whereas everyone is in agreement that we need to be on watch against Islamist terrorists, whether homegrown or foreign-based, there's still plenty of folks who will deny that the USA has a major problem with racism.
Edit: Though it occurs to me now that you're actually talking about KMC, not the media. In either case, my #2 comment stands.
I think the US has had plenty of Jihad, more then people think or remember, we just all forget as well.
Here is the list
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/americanattacks.htm
Originally posted by Robtard
Again, OV's error in not accounting for 20-something deaths over a 20ish year span doesn't really dismiss his point.But if you read his #2 post and substitute "40" for the "20", it doesn't change the point.
Yes just 20-something people died in 9/11 😆
Wilson was exonerated of all charges, and people like Bardock don't agree. Even when justice is served, if its not to their agenda, its heresay.