Originally posted by SurturYouTube video
Speaking of drones I know someone who has one. Not a military drone obviously, they use it to take pictures and had it up in the clouds on the 4th of July taking photo's of fireworks at interesting angles.He is a civilian, so it makes me wonder how long until we have civilians hooking up guns or other weapons to the drones they can buy? Since he already modded the drone(not for guns) but I'm thinking someone clever enough could probably rig something up.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
I think the US has had plenty of Jihad, more then people think or remember, we just all forget as well.Here is the list
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/americanattacks.htm
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
So how is a Arab with a gun killing White marines not racist?
Originally posted by Omega Vision
Robtard basically addressed this. Whether 20 or 40 years, it's nothing compared to the history of racially motivated killings of blacks in America.Here's my question: if there had been a black guy or an Asian among the Marines, do you think the shooter would have spared them? If so, that's an assumption based on absolutely no evidence.
Of coarse not, but if it had been 4 black marines, then what?
Why do they have to be white for it to be racist?
Guy specifically targetted a different group of people than himself. Whether that be because of race, religion, or just hailing from a different country there's a hate aspect to it. Really doesn't matter at that point what sort of place you want to file that under.
Originally posted by One Big MobNo one is denying that the attack was targeted against a specific group of individuals (soldiers), but racism has a definition. There's nothing wrong with pointing out that his actions don't align with the definition of racism.
Why do they have to be white for it to be racist?Guy specifically targetted a different group of people than himself. Whether that be because of race, religion, or just hailing from a different country there's a hate aspect to it. Really doesn't matter at that point what sort of place you want to file that under.
Originally posted by TzeentchIt's a retarded schemantic though is what I'm saying. Does labeling it an act of hate really make a difference? As long as it wasn't racism it's fine.
No one is denying that the attack was targeted against a specific group of individuals (soldiers), but racism has a definition. There's nothing wrong with pointing out that his actions don't align with the definition of racism.
Guy killed some American "enforcement" because they were against his bottom dawgs. I don't see why skin color really makes a difference in the amount of hate there. It wasn't racism, it was just based on severe hate because they differed from him!
Though not really sure in the first place how that would make this worse or better. Guy got sent in the murder "his" enemies, but it's worse because hate was involved in the motivation or something? I don't see the point in strong against or for "racism" in this case. Almost diminishes the actual act. Like when people call cold blooded murderers goofballs or bullies.
Flag's never went to half mass at the white house, and no call from the President to any of the family's.
Stark contrast to this.
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/obama-joins-michael-brown-parents-calls-calm