Snape vs Khan

Started by quanchi11212 pages

Originally posted by RJ 2.0
Nah, he loses. Again.
Based on ?

Originally posted by RJ 2.0
Nah, you have been wrong avbout everything. Every decision you have ever made has been wrong. You are a laughing stock and should be forced to wear a dunce cap for the rest of your life.

If I was your brother I would have strangled you at birth.

No, I haven't been wrong about a thing. Khan kills Snape before he even raises his want. Khan wins, easily.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, I haven't been wrong about a thing. Khan kills Snape before he even raises his want. Khan wins, easily.

Quan. You thinking khan wins is your personal decision. Everyone elses is Snape. It doesn't really matter as there is no right or wrong answer as the two have never fought. It's only your opinion. So don't say that you're wrong or right as you are neither in some cases.

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
Quan. You thinking khan wins is your personal decision. Everyone elses is Snape. It doesn't really matter as there is no right or wrong answer as the two have never fought. It's only your opinion. So don't say that you're wrong or right as you are neither in some cases.
Khan is much quicker on the draw than Snape. Khan wins. The hate is strong against me. It makes me strong.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Khan is much quicker on the draw than Snape. Khan wins. The hate is strong against me. It makes me strong.

Well whether that is true or not Snape has the greater versatility. He can fly and disapparate and thus by himself time to do whatever he needs to do and Khan can't really repel Avada Kedavra or has any defense to those spells.

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
Well whether that is true or not Snape has the greater versatility. He can fly and disapparate and thus by himself time to do whatever he needs to do and Khan can't really repel Avada Kedavra or has any defense to those spells.
Khan guns him down. The end. You aren't even familiar with Khan.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Khan guns him down. The end. You aren't even familiar with Khan.

First off you have to make a case that he can get past all of shapes vesatility which is a tall order. Also Snape is smart and lives in the modern world so guns aren't a mystery to him living in a muggle house and being exposed to muggle things. So guns aren't just going to suprise him. Then he has a massive versatility that he can use to off balance, khan, destroy his weapons, or shrink him.

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
In the books it's reserved speciffacly for Voldemort I believe to show his power however in the movies anyone can do it or most of the death eaters can.

Nah Snape could in the books as well.

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
First off you have to make a case that he can get past all of shapes vesatility which is a tall order. Also Snape is smart and lives in the modern world so guns aren't a mystery to him living in a muggle house and being exposed to muggle things. So guns aren't just going to suprise him. Then he has a massive versatility that he can use to off balance, khan, destroy his weapons, or shrink him.
You go by Rowling even though I don't so according to your own logic a gun beats him. Irony. Khan wins. Versatility doesn't mean a hit when the other guy kills you before you can react.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You go by Rowling even though I don't so according to your own logic a gun beats him. Irony. Khan wins. Versatility doesn't mean a hit when the other guy kills you before you can react.

So you don't go by the author? That makes zero since. Again you can't say that Snape won't be able to react due to the fact he has occlumency and legilimency and apparition. That is versatility. Rowling is the creator thus what she wants is what is. The movies are what she says they are ad if you have any doubts about that do your research. I actually found a video where it interviews here and Warner brothers and they say she chose the producers and directors so they would stay true to her vision. So yes Rowling is the ultimate voice for Harry Potter. Always has been.

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
So you don't go by the author? That makes zero since. Again you can't say that Snape won't be able to react due to the fact he has occlumency and legilimency and apparition. That is versatility. Rowling is the creator thus what she wants is what is. The movies are what she says they are ad if you have any doubts about that do your research. I actually found a video where it interviews here and Warner brothers and they say she chose the producers and directors so they would stay true to her vision. So yes Rowling is the ultimate voice for Harry Potter. Always has been.
I know but you do which means you agree with her. They still decided what changed and what stayed the same. Khan wins. Faster.

Just like he'd beat Tommy boy, right?

Originally posted by quanchi112
I know but you do which means you agree with her. They still decided what changed and what stayed the same. Khan wins. Faster.

No they had to stay within her guidelines. She made sure they stayed within the guidelines while making it most film applicable as possible. So yes she dictates what changes and what stays the same, she chooses the directors and producers, she here self had and still has complete creative control over Harry Potter, and has worked as a creative consultant with complete creative control on all 8 films and was even a producer for the last 2 for sure and had some other leading parts in films some of the other films as well. Again his speed is matched and surpassed by snapes versatility and it doesn't help when khan is in a location that has to much cover and outside distraction that Snape does have better awareness of this he would use it better to his advantage. Then with all that it takes one spell Avada Kedavra and he doesn't have to say the spells he just uses them.

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
No they had to stay within her guidelines. She made sure they stayed within the guidelines while making it most film applicable as possible. So yes she dictates what changes and what stays the same, she chooses the directors and producers, she here self had and still has complete creative control over Harry Potter, and has worked as a creative consultant with complete creative control on all 8 films and was even a producer for the last 2 for sure and had some other leading parts in films some of the other films as well. Again his speed is matched and surpassed by snapes versatility and it doesn't help when khan is in a location that has to much cover and outside distraction that Snape does have better awareness of this he would use it better to his advantage. Then with all that it takes one spell Avada Kedavra and he doesn't have to say the spells he just uses them.
The directors have power over the films so once they are chosen they make the ultimate decision.

Khan is quicker and according to your writer a muggle with a shotgun is better, right ? Khan is a superhuman with futuristic technology.

😂

according to your writer a muggle with a shotgun is better, right ?

Gotta love how this is a valid argument when it suits you

Originally posted by StealthRanger
Gotta love how this is a valid argument when it suits you
That is accordinG to him not me. That's what it makes it even more ironic. According to his own logic Khan wins.

Originally posted by quanchi112
The directors have power over the films so once they are chosen they make the ultimate decision.

Khan is quicker and according to your writer a muggle with a shotgun is better, right ? Khan is a superhuman with futuristic technology.

😂

Yet have to follow the guidelines of the books and the writers wishes. She has complete creative control and she made sure they stayed with her vision. So while not every detail on the book is in the movie not every detail can be in the movies as movies can only be so long.

She says and I quote a muggle with a shotgun can defeat a wizard. That really is her saying that these wizards while powerful aren't immortal by birth and don't have any superhuman abilities. However if the two encountered one another that doesn't mean the muggle wins. What if the person disapparates or turns invisible or just turns the gun into something else or uses some other random spell. This location also helps snape as he knows it better than khan.

KHAN NOONIEN QUAN wins

Just to note it's really irrelevant what JK Rowling says. Feats matter. Voldemort isn't even close to being your average wizard anyways, nor is Snape..and it seems like she was talking about your average wizard with the shotgun statement.

She also has a habit of saying shit that doesn't make any sense. Like Dumbledore suddenly turning out to be gay..despite nothing really showing this. He was besties with Grindelwald at one point, but that was due to having a lot in common as opposed to being romantically into the guy. Oh wait sorry.."he totally likes knitting patterns" is another gem people use. Oh wait, he also dresses flamboyantly. See, because no wizards besides Dumbledore are ever noted as dressing strangely. Nor did the ones not born into muggle households ever show a certain fascination with aspects of muggle culture.

Originally posted by Surtur
Just to note it's really irrelevant what JK Rowling says. Feats matter. Voldemort isn't even close to being your average wizard anyways, nor is Snape..and it seems like she was talking about your average wizard with the shotgun statement.

She also has a habit of saying shit that doesn't make any sense. Like Dumbledore suddenly turning out to be gay..despite nothing really showing this. He was besties with Grindelwald at one point, but that was due to having a lot in common as opposed to being romantically into the guy. Oh wait sorry.."he totally likes knitting patterns" is another gem people use. Oh wait, he also dresses flamboyantly. See, because no wizards besides Dumbledore are ever noted as dressing strangely. Nor did the ones not born into muggle households ever show a certain fascination with aspects of muggle culture.

Actually what she says is very relevenT as she is the creator of Harry Potter. Feats do matter but what she says is more important as she is the creator. The rest I agree with in this paragraph.

Actually their are certain little clues she leaves in the books and the movies like how he dresses for instance. Also his relationship with grindlewald for him was a love relationship. He loved him. He felt they were more than besties. Knitting patterns and the way he dresses, what other wizard dresses that is a man dresses like that. Lucius doesn't and he's rich. Arthur doesn't, Kingsley has his uniform but has a natural hat that covers his bald head and really wears blue with purple which matches. Harry doesn't. Ron doesnt. Neville Seamus dean, Fred, George, Dobby, Draco, moody, lupin, Sirius, snape, flitwick, don't. So really those are more hints as really toward the end of his life j would say he was asexual.