Originally posted by EmperorSidious2What is this rubbish ? She has input but the director ultimately decides.
https://youtu.be/Lnb-XIZwbY0 I believe this is what you were looking for. Starting at 6:40 mark and got to 7:48 mark71 years is less than 115 year
No proof and really it's all opinion. So it comes down to popular opinion. Popular opinion goes with dumbledore.
So ? Voldemort outlived Albus and he died due to dark magic.
Evidence and movie versions clearly say Voldemort.
Originally posted by quanchi112
What is this rubbish ? She has input but the director ultimately decides.So ? Voldemort outlived Albus and he died due to dark magic.
Evidence and movie versions clearly say Voldemort.
She changed an entire scene. Apparently not as she changed it.
So two did voldemrt.
No it shows dumbledore has better.
Originally posted by quanchi112
They can collaborate but the director has the ultimate power.What ?
Nah.
The director wanted to,have Harry fight Snape. She stepped in and said no the book says differently and we see a mcgonagall vs Snape battle.
Retread the post.
Really voldemrt doesn't have any feats dumbledore can't defend, replicate, or has already topped.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2They can have a talk about anything but the director decides since he is the director.
The director wanted to,have Harry fight Snape. She stepped in and said no the book says differently and we see a mcgonagall vs Snape battle.Retread the post.
Really voldemrt doesn't have any feats dumbledore can't defend, replicate, or has already topped.
Why ?
Khan wins. Writers don't count here.
He has better feats so what you're saying is speculative.
Originally posted by quanchi112
They can have a talk about anything but the director decides since he is the director.Why ?
Khan wins. Writers don't count here.
He has better feats so what you're saying is speculative.
They can talk all they want but if something that she doesn't like happens she changes it.
So you can know what we were talking about.
Youre the only one who supports him. Only in your little mind.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2No, the director can go with her or against her.
They can talk all they want but if something that she doesn't like happens she changes it.So you can know what we were talking about.
Youre the only one who supports him. Only in your little mind.
You're an idiot.
False. Khan wins. FAster and more powerful.
Originally posted by quanchi112
No, the director can go with her or against her.You're an idiot.
False. Khan wins. FAster and more powerful.
Then why didn't he if he wanted Harry to fight Snape?
Don't describe yourself Quan.
I don't see any other khan supporters who are actual khan supporters. Faster? Snape is quick on the draw and has the cover of the forbidden Forrest and can apparate. Also snapes protego can block his weaponry.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2He might have through the her idea was better.
Then why didn't he if he wanted Harry to fight Snape?Don't describe yourself Quan.
I don't see any other khan supporters who are actual khan supporters. Faster? Snape is quick on the draw and has the cover of the forbidden Forrest and can apparate. Also snapes protego can block his weaponry.
Irony.
I argue based off evidence. Khan is factually faster than Snape. He wins. Snape isn't quicker on the draw than Khan. Not even close.
Originally posted by quanchi112
He might have through the her idea was better.Irony.
I argue based off evidence. Khan is factually faster than Snape. He wins. Snape isn't quicker on the draw than Khan. Not even close.
Speculation. It's in the books fact and the director wanted Harry vs Snape so yes she changed it due to it being what she wanted.
I'm not saying that in combat speed Snape is faster as khan is a human augment while Snape is still human. Now him winning is your own opinion. It doesn't take him much to pull out a wand and then he can apparate without the wand it's not really hard for him to get away or do whatever he needs to do. Also he has occlumency and legilimency.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2You speculated she ordered him to.
Speculation. It's in the books fact and the director wanted Harry vs Snape so yes she changed it due to it being what she wanted.I'm not saying that in combat speed Snape is faster as khan is a human augment while Snape is still human. Now him winning is your own opinion. It doesn't take him much to pull out a wand and then he can apparate without the wand it's not really hard for him to get away or do whatever he needs to do. Also he has occlumency and legilimency.
He can't apparatus faster than khan guns him down. Khan wins.
Originally posted by quanchi112
You speculated she ordered him to.He can't apparatus faster than khan guns him down. Khan wins.
I showed you the damn video of what happened. She got it changed.
It's pretty instant. Also he had the Forrest for cover and protego. You're the only one who legitamently thinks so.
Originally posted by quanchi112
If you don't think they collaborate then prove it.You already conceded Khan is faster. You conceded the fight.
I didnt say they don't collaborate I just said they didn't collaborate on this specific thing.
No. You can be faster doesn't mean you're going to win. Snaps has massive versatility, and also better awareness of the location. To many factors working agiasnt khan.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2Then prove it. Now you backpedal.
I didnt say they don't collaborate I just said they didn't collaborate on this specific thing.No. You can be faster doesn't mean you're going to win. Snaps has massive versatility, and also better awareness of the location. To many factors working agiasnt khan.
Being faster and with the power here proves he one shots Snape.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Then prove it. Now you backpedal.Being faster and with the power here proves he one shots Snape.
You made the claim that they do collaborate. There is no proof to show they did collaborate. He wanted one thing she wanted another. The other thing was in the book and that's what we see.
Location and snapes versatility counter balance that.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2So they collaborated. She doesn't storm onto the scene and just change shit.
You made the claim that they do collaborate. There is no proof to show they did collaborate. He wanted one thing she wanted another. The other thing was in the book and that's what we see.Location and snapes versatility counter balance that.
Khan is the better warrior than Snape so again is slower and doesn't havebthr tactical acumen Khan possesses.
Originally posted by quanchi112
So they collaborated. She doesn't storm onto the scene and just change shit.Khan is the better warrior than Snape so again is slower and doesn't havebthr tactical acumen Khan possesses.
It's no proof they did on this thing. She lets then have some freedom but when it challenges her vision then she makes them does what needs to be done. She is the author and holds all power of Harry Potter movies, and books.
Snapes is a wizard not a warrior. You make it sound like snapes is an idiot. He's very smart with a wide variety of spells at his command. Also he knows the location better than khan. With that all it takes on both sides is one shot to kill, however snaps has to much greater variety with the ability to teleport at different angles and off balance khan.