General Primary Discussion Thread

Started by |King Joker|212 pages

Hillary would shit on Trump in the general, lmfao

You really have no clue what you are talking about, try to keep stupid statements like to yourself. It only shows your ignorance.

^ Irony post of the year.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
You really have no clue what you are talking about, try to keep stupid statements like to yourself. It only shows your ignorance.
LMFAO, says the resident dumbass.

Enlighten yourself:
http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/24/politics/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-cnn-poll-2016-election/

http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/hillary-clinton-favorable-rating

http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/donald-trump-favorable-rating

http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/2016-general-election-trump-vs-clinton

All the polls said Trump would walk out 2 months in.

Polls dont meant shit, jackass.

Originally posted by |King Joker|
Hillary would shit on Trump in the general, lmfao

And yet when Trump started in the republican primary he was barely noticed.

What I find interesting is that both front runners aren't considered trustworthy in many polls and yet somehow we want them to be our leaders. 😘

Originally posted by Nephthys
^ Irony post of the year.

Says the sniper of the year who can't actually hold a debate but is real good at fancy one liners.

🙄

Originally posted by |King Joker|
LMFAO, says the resident dumbass.

Enlighten yourself:
http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/24/politics/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-cnn-poll-2016-election/

http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/hillary-clinton-favorable-rating

http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/donald-trump-favorable-rating

http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/2016-general-election-trump-vs-clinton

Reagan in 80 was behind by more against Carter. You act like this is over..

It hasn't even started.

So strap in, dumbass.

Yeah, the person who's hated and even more polarizing than Hillary definitely has a chance in the general election, lmao. 🙄

Hillary will be the 45th President whether you like it or not.

I'm going to laugh my ass off when she is indicted in a less then a month.

"The FBI is ready to indict Hillary Clinton and if its recommendation isn’t followed by the U.S. attorney general, the agency’s investigators plan to blow the whistle and go public with their findings, former U.S. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay tells Newsmax TV.

“I have friends that are in the FBI and they tell me they’re ready to indict,” DeLay said Monday on “The Steve Malzberg Show.”

Read more: http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/breaking-fbi-is-ready-to-indict-hillary-rodham-clinton/#ixzz43sCvGYgT

Oh yea, then there is this

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/if-america-cant-see-hilla_b_9530100.html

I'd like for her to get indicted, if only to hand Bernie the nomination. So, yeah.

So quit acting like your a god damn Hilary fan.

You should be hoping to hell she does, cause according to the polls Sanders beats Trump by a much larger margin.

At least we can agree Sanders should be the nominee.👆

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Reagan in 80 was behind by more against Carter.

[list=1][*]Carter had the worst post-war poll performance of any candidate accept Nixon. Both Clinton and Sanders are performing much better than he did.

[*]Reagan chose his primary opponent George H.W. Bush to be his running mate. Trump is not likely to choose Cruz to be his Vice President, and even in the event he did, Cruz would not be likely to accept.[/list]

This election is not 1980 all over again for Republicans, despite Trump stealing Reagan's campaign slogan and Cruz claiming to be the second coming.

Hilary has a 64% dishonesty among voters.

Chelsea Clinton slams Obama care, 'Crushing Costs'

http://www.weeklystandard.com/article/2001707

Bill Clinton slams Obama's "legacy"

'Hillary can 'put the awful legacy of the last eight years behind us'

http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/21/politics/bill-clinton-hillary-obama-legacy/

Wow, What do you know, she lied about having a private email account prior to March 2009

"The previously undisclosed February 2009 emails between Clinton from her then-chief of staff, Cheryl Mills, raise new questions about the scope of emails from Clinton’s early days in office that were not handed over to the State Department for recordkeeping and may have been lost entirely.

Clinton’s presidential campaign has previously claimed that the former top diplomat did not use her personal "clintonemail.com" account before March 2009, weeks after she was sworn in as secretary of State."

But on Thursday, the watchdog group Judicial Watch released one message from Feb. 13, 2009, in which Mills communicated with Clinton on the account to discuss the National Security Agency’s (NSA) efforts to produce a secure BlackBerry device for her to use as secretary of State.

A another bold faced lie.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Chelsea Clinton slams Obama care, 'Crushing Costs'

http://www.weeklystandard.com/article/2001707

Bill Clinton slams Obama's "legacy"

'Hillary can 'put the awful legacy of the last eight years behind us'

http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/21/politics/bill-clinton-hillary-obama-legacy/

From the article:

A Bill Clinton aide later clarified that the former President was "referring to the GOP's obstructionism and not President Obama's legacy."

That is also how I interpreted that statement given the context. He had been talking about the divisiveness of the country in the last 8 years, and it seems pretty clear he's talking about the Obstructionism of the Republicans, which has been a talking point of the Democratic party for years.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Says the sniper of the year who can't actually hold a debate but is real good at fancy one liners.

🙄

Flatterer.

Wow, What do you know, she lied about having a private email account prior to March 2009

"The previously undisclosed February 2009 emails between Clinton from her then-chief of staff, Cheryl Mills, raise new questions about the scope of emails from Clinton’s early days in office that were not handed over to the State Department for recordkeeping and may have been lost entirely.

Clinton’s presidential campaign has previously claimed that the former top diplomat did not use her personal "clintonemail.com" account before March 2009, weeks after she was sworn in as secretary of State."

There are so many things wrong with her server setup. Without a shadow of a doubt she sent sensitive material through her server and received it.

To bad people believe she is qualified to be president and is shown time and again to be a liar.