General Primary Discussion Thread

Started by Robtard212 pages

Rather disturbing that juicy sound bites > actual substance.

I'd happily take a Rubio, Kasich or Paul over Trump and especially Cruz any day, if a republican is destined to win.

Originally posted by Robtard
The hell is Rubio dropping. He's a much more relatable candidate than Cruz. At least to me; that's probably the problem though, considering the party.

Marco Rubio is a total joke. Every time he speaks I think . . .

Take a Sip

And Have a Seat

Ha.

But if the choice has to be Trump, Cruz or Rubio in the oval office, you'd not go with Rubio?

She said Isis was using Trump to recruit for Isis😂😂

This will go down as one of her biggest blunders since Benghazi.

Doubt it will even be news by New Years aside from conservative outlets.

Lol all over CNN this morning😂

Keep downplaying her dumb story she made up.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
She said Isis was using Trump to recruit for Isis😂😂

This will go down as one of her biggest blunders since Benghazi.

Yet, her supporters won't care. She could murder their first born and they still wouldn't care. They want someone who gives them freebies and they want it to be a woman just to break the cycle. Doesn't matter what underhanded shit she's done and they don't care that she was responsible for four Americans getting killed in Benghazi. They want a President with a vagina. Period.

They don't even care she takes money from the Saudis.

She hates hedge fund managers but her son is a hedge fund manager😂

"Isis uses Trump to recruit for Isis"😂

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Lol all over CNN this morning😂

Keep downplaying her dumb story she made up.

Yeah, I saw it on AOL today too and that's hardly a right-wing news source.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Lol all over CNN this morning😂

Keep downplaying her dumb story she made up.

Who is downplaying? She said something and proof has yet to be found, but the substance of the story isn't something that's going to stay prominent for a long time. It'll pass.

Look at Trump's ridiculous "I saw thousands of people cheering when the towers came down". It had it's moment; people laughed at Trump's nonsense and it passed.

Trump even said he likes CNN better then fox because they are more fair with him. I beleive it too because I watch both.

I wonder what people have to say about that.

Originally posted by Robtard
Who is downplaying? She said something and proof has yet to be found, but the substance of the story isn't something that's going to stay prominent for a long time. It'll pass.

No it won't Rob, do you want to takes bets it will be in their first debate?

Originally posted by Robtard
Ha.

But if the choice has to be Trump, Cruz or Rubio in the oval office, you'd not go with Rubio?

I do not accept the premise, because I do not believe any of them have a realistic chance of being elected.

The question then becomes who I would like to receive the Republican nomination and run against Clinton in the general election.

I would pick Cruz. Not only does Clinton beat him in every hypothetical match up, but he is disliked even by members of his own party.

Not to mention that if Trump does not receive the nomination, he is so thin-skinned and such a sore loser, that he will likely run as an independent.

Not necessarily because he believes he can win, but because it would divide the Republican vote, and ensure that Republicans lose.

He can then go around saying, "The RNC are losers. They should have nominated me, then they would have won."

Polls of Bilary vs Cruz say it's neck and neck with Cruz the slight majority.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
No it won't Rob, do you want to takes bets it will be in their first debate?

Trump will mention it every chance he gets, he doesn't count though, unless you think he's a main-steam media outlet?

He sets the news, haven't you figured that out yet, the media favors Trump to win, so he will win.

People want trump and there is nothing you can do to stop it.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Trump even said he likes CNN better then fox because they are more fair with him. I beleive it too because I watch both.

I wonder what people have to say about that.

Honestly, I think Trump just said that because of the beef he has with Megan Kelly. O'Reilly usually defends him well. Speaking of Bill, really looking forward to watching his show tonight. I missed his show over the weekend.

Bill hits him with tough questions and opinions, trump actually likes it.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
I do not accept the premise, because I do not believe any of them have a realistic chance of being elected.

The question then becomes who I would like to receive the Republican nomination and run against Clinton in the general election.

I would pick Cruz. Not only does Clinton beat him in every hypothetical match up, but he is disliked even by members of his own party.

Not to mention that if Trump does not receive the nomination, he is so thin-skinned and such a sore loser, that he will likely run as an independent.

Not necessarily because he believes he can win, but because it would divide the Republican vote, and ensure that Republicans lose.

He can then go around saying, "The RNC are losers. They should have nominated me, then they would have won."


Fair enough. It was just a hypothetical "if".

The Trump quote would be spot on. Even read it in his voice.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
He sets the news, haven't you figured that out yet, the media favors Trump to win, so he will win.

People want trump and there is nothing you can do to stop it.

Alight then, just don't blow a gasket when that doesn't happen.