Let me ask this: I assume you have no real issue with them forcing people to allow refugee's onto private property that isn't being used.
Let me ask this: what if there wasn't an overabundance or empty private property for people? How would you feel if the government actually tried to force people to provide shelter for refugee's in their own homes? Lets say they will also reimburse them for it and let us also say they somehow did background checks so they aren't putting known criminals with people. Would you support this action?
If you would not support this and there was still not an overabundance of empty buildings to house these people then where would you of suggested putting them?