14 year old boy makes a clock - Is arrested by Police

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Why are you on a keyboard? I'm on my phone on the treadmill at the gym.

Keyboards are so 90's bro.

Let's just call this a victory for the moderates in this board and a loss for the liberals.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Do the other gym goers look at you funny when you start swearing spontaneously while reading KMC?

If this place could make he cuss out loud I would be impressed.

Originally posted by Surtur
Damn dude you can post while running on a tread mill? This makes me feel like I lack drive and motivation. I can't even post while I'm smoking weed.

Originally posted by red g jacks
he has an app where you shout angrily into the phone and it transcribes your screaming into half-assed forum posts

I don't even give full effort here and I won most debates. Imagine if I actually gave a ****🙂

The left always loses to their sins, so unless they step up their game I can keep on auto pilot.

Ha, good one

Originally posted by Robtard
Ha, good one

I proved you wrong on all accounts, and you have surrendered here anyways.

The kid did this on purpose, he had no project or reason to bring it in, he knew it would cause controversy and his sister did this 3 years before. He was defiant to the police as well.

Take the loss🙂

TI, please stop that. Ush has scolded you about doing that "I won" crap like you're some bratty 5 year old, knock it off.

He said not to say concession accepted.

I didn't.

So instead you say the same basic thing but in a dumber fashion? I know you're dense, but I don't think you're that dense.

If you want to have a discussion, then have a discussion. Don't pretend you want to have a discussion then go around saying "I win" when no one wants to bother responding to your stupidity like some feeble minded child.

So people can be proved wrong and then just keep going? Everyone here meaning the normal crew that screams "bigot, racist" blew this open with in accurate and pre judged the situation just like Michael Brown. That's ok though.

Yes.

But that's beside the point since no one was proven wrong in this thread.

How so? The kid knew what he was doing and did it on purpose.

This goes against all this "racism" claims and everything else.

Did you read the whole thread and the wild accusations and assumptions people were making?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
How so? The kid knew what he was doing and did it on purpose.

This goes against all this "racism" claims and everything else.

Did you read the whole thread and the wild accusations and assumptions people were making?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
How so? The kid knew what he was doing and did it on purpose.

This goes against all this "racism" claims and everything else.

Did you read the whole thread and the wild accusations and assumptions people were making?

No one proved the kid did anything wrong intentionally. The only thing you posted was about his sister getting suspended for a bomb threat, which she herself brought up as a condemnation of the school district.

Then you missed the article I posted by the IBD.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Then you missed the article I posted by the IBD.

No, I saw that as well. It was just even more worthless than the story about the sister. Just a bunch of assumptions and non-sequiturs, and some claims that are completely unsourced.

So how sister says she didn't do it...blames racism and you eat that turd sandwich with a smile?

You'll never learn, will you?

Originally posted by long pig
So how sister says she didn't do it...blames racism and you eat that turd sandwich with a smile?

You'll never learn, will you?

I didn't say I believed her. I simply said there is not enough information about that story to make it worthwhile in this case. Perhaps she did do it, or perhaps it was racism. I don't know. It proves nothing at all.

😂
There's witnesses. There was enough evidence and She was punished.

The only proof you'll accept is for her to admit it?

It shows your bias.

Everything is there for a rational person.

Originally posted by long pig
😂
There's witnesses. There was enough evidence and She was punished.

The only proof you'll accept is for her to admit it?

It shows your bias.

Everything is there for a rational person.

She doesn't have to admit it, but there has to be proof beyond what is currently available, which is little/nothing. Actual documentation of some kind.

But regardless, her guilt/innocence has nothing to do with what her brother did.