Jedi Dooku vs. ROTS Obi Wan Kenobi

Started by carthage5 pages

Jedi Dooku vs. ROTS Obi Wan Kenobi

Standard duel

Match takes place in front of Yoda and the Jedi council

Dooku.

He was the Temple's "strongest student" and "most learned in the ways of the Force."

Plus physically he must be younger and stronger than he was in ROTS.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Dooku.

He was the Temple's "strongest student" and "most learned in the ways of the Force."

Plus physically he must be younger and stronger than he was in ROTS.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Dooku.

He was the Temple's "strongest student" and "most learned in the ways of the Force."

Plus physically he must be younger and stronger than he was in ROTS.

I'd say Dooku, as a jedi whilst he wouldn't have his sith powers he was still an incredible duelist and was considered to be one of the most gifted jedi of his day plus he wouldn't be as weak physically when he was younger.

I'd go with Kenobi. Fighting evenly with Maul, Vader, etc. is just better than some accolades and conjecture on Jedi Dooku's combative level.

Dooku takes a dookie on Kenobi's corpse.

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
So you agree youth does matter.

Kenobi

makashi > soresu

This could probably go both ways tbh.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So you agree youth does matter.

No as Sidious and Yoda re some of the oldest characters and yet they are like the top 2 and Dooku is older than Sidious and can still beat so many people so no. Youth is at best an edge, but one that can be easily counteracted by experience.

Originally posted by redpill
makashi > soresu

Don't ever use that logic ever again.

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
No as Sidious and Yoda re some of the oldest characters and yet they are like the top 2 and Dooku is older than Sidious and can still beat so many people so no. Youth is at best an edge, but one that can be easily counteracted by experience.
Who is to say Yoda and Sidious weren't better years ago ?

Well you agree it's an advantage and experience doesn't always have to do with a greater age just more combat.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Who is to say Yoda and Sidious weren't better years ago ?

Well you agree it's an advantage and experience doesn't always have to do with a greater age just more combat.

Sidious defintily wasn't. He gain d power as he got older. His ROTJ self is better than ROTS and TPM.

With greater age you tend to while not always tend to have more experience. I would take experience over youth any day however.

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
Sidious defintily wasn't. He gain d power as he got older. His ROTJ self is better than ROTS and TPM.

With greater age you tend to while not always tend to have more experience. I would take experience over youth any day however.

He was already older though.

Ask any bball great to compare their mid thirties to their late twenties. What's better ?

He's got a point, there. Just ask Kobe.

bball players don't get increasingly greater access to a mystical energy field as they get more experience, so that's not exactly a good comparison

You sure about that?

Originally posted by Emperordmb
bball players don't get increasingly greater access to a mystical energy field as they get more experience, so that's not exactly a good comparison
Do tell.