CNN GOP Debate

Originally posted by Robtard
On Rubio, it's just not something I see in him as being a president. After being a VP for 8 years, sure. He's well spoken and gets his points across probably better than any of the other ten, but he also comes off as a bit green.

Are we going to pretend that you haven't spent a considerable amount of time in here making it obvious that you despise Hillary Clinton? Okay then.

edit: You called her a "disgusting human being" just today.

What she did was disgusting. Did you even read the article?

What males Hilary "presidential to you."

When I look at her, I see the words, dishonest and scandal.

Why are the clintons always involved in a scandal?

Well the Clintons ARE associated with scandal and sleazy politics.

So what you might have to ask yourself, TI, is why is it that voters don't really seem to care very much? You can either write voters off as ignorant and lacking morals or you can consider why none of the Clinton scandals really hits home.

For example, with the whole Monica Lewinsky thing- the witch-hunters thought it would destroy Bill's image, but in the end, I think all it did to those who might have possibly voted for him anyway was make them think "Well, he's pretty normal then". It was an interesting story but it didn't make a difference as to their view of him as a president.

So we're pretending you don't vehemently dislike Hillary then? Fine.

Already said, she's a very well seasoned stateswoman, former first lady, senator and SoS. You can disagree with her politics, sure. But to pretend she'd be an inept clusterball of a President is lying to yourself.

Originally posted by Ushgarak
Well the Clintons ARE associated with scandal and sleazy politics.

So what you might have to ask yourself, TI, is why is it that voters don't really seem to care very much? You can either write voters off as ignorant and lacking morals or you can consider why none of the Clinton scandals really hits home.

For example, with the whole Monica Lewinsky thing- the witch-hunters thought it would destroy Bill's image, but in the end, I think all it did to those who might have possibly voted for him anyway was make them think "Well, he's pretty normal then". It was an interesting story but it didn't make a difference as to their view of him as a president.

He was caught lying and was impeached, sure it didn't destroy him. I'm not even trying to imply that the Clintons are not like able. I actually like Bill purely on charisma, I mean, it's hard to hold a grudge against that guy. He's a pretty smooth talker.

But that doesn't replace the facts, he was impeached.

He was acquitted when impeached, which is the far more important fact. In fact, the whole impeachment chase probably hurt the Republicans more than him.

This is the point I am making about people. So many of these thing you accuse Hilary of- most of the people that might vote for her don't really see them as big deals. Some dodgy business stuff and an almost incomprehensible bureaucratic thing about emails? If she was running for 'Honest Person of the Year', she'd lose, but her potential voters don't see this as making an difference to her being a President. Presidents are not perfect, because they are people, and people do have a tendency to lie, cheat and steal.

And in having strong convictions, determination and being a bit canny, as shown by some of these 'scandals', they may even be a positive. I think a crafty President is a good idea.

Originally posted by Ushgarak
He was acquitted when impeached, which is the far more important fact. In fact, the whole impeachment chase probably hurt the Republicans more than him.

This is the point I am making about people. So many of these thing you accuse Hilary of- most of the people that might vote for her don't really see them as big deals. Some dodgy business stuff and an almost incomprehensible bureaucratic thing about emails? If she was running for 'Honest Person of the Year', she'd lose, but her potential voters don't see this as making an difference to her being a President. Presidents are not perfect, because they are people, and people do have a tendency to lie, cheat and steal.

And in having strong convictions, determination and being a bit canny, as shown by some of these 'scandals', they may even be a positive. I think a crafty President is a good idea.

Good post👆

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Ok, not only did he call them out, but so did everyone else, so you are wrong. And since you can't recognize the mod's being complete asshats, I see why your political beliefs are bogus.

👆

It's also hilarious he thinks that Cruz "embarassed himself" when his support has gone way up after that debate. Anyone can see that just by checking Twitter or Facebook. Only people who think something as stupid as what Retard said are people who are slow (or just butthurt, LOL) and don't understand what Cruz accomplished. He's the one last night who started exposing the bias of the mods of the left-wing media. The Republicans rallied together and Cruz led them. All libs can do is cry about it now. Their bias has been exposed.

Retard is actually "embarassing himself".

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
👆

Yes, OV is at least honest. Unlike Rob. Before debate last night, I was still undecided between Trump and Rubio. Now, I'm leaning more towards the latter. His performance was stellar last night. Now though, there's two other candidates I'm interested in: Christie and Cruz. I still like Fiorina somewhat and will vote for her if she somehow wins the nomination. Ben Carson didn't do so well last night. My support of him has dropped a little.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
What does this have to do with anything, you said you cant see Rubio as President, but you can see Hilary as President.

Rubio>Hilary

First I hated Obama, now I hate Hilary. According to you anyone who I don't agree with, I hate.

IT's more like Rubio>>>>>>>HIllary.

LMAO@ Rob saying Rubio wouldn't make agood President. He's far better choice for President than anyone on the democratic side and that's a friggin' fact. 👆

At least he's not responsible for getting four Americans killed, race-baiting, and lying with every word that comes out of his mouth.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Hate is a strong word, especially on the internet, but on the internet it is used to much for marginalize someones opinion.

Its the same way liberals use "racism, sexism."

Its identity politics at its finest.

Originally posted by Star428
👆

It's also hilarious he thinks that Cruz "embarassed himself" when his support has gone way up after that debate. Anyone can see that just by checking Twitter or Facebook. Only people who think something as stupid as what Retard said are people who are slow (or just butthurt, LOL) and don't understand what Cruz accomplished. He's the one last night who started exposing the bias of the mods of the left-wing media. The Republicans rallied together and Cruz led them. All libs can do is cry about it now. Their bias has been exposed.

Retard is actually "embarassing himself".

Guess he missed where the audience gave Cruz a big applause when he said that, huh? They sure as Hell weren't laughing which is what they would've done if he had actually "embarrased himself".

"Embarassed himself". 😆 🤣 🤣 😂 😂

Cruz raised code to a million bucks less then 24 hours after that debate.

He is coming up in my book. I am really starting to like him more.

Star you that ***** Megyn Kelly attacks trump every single episode of her pathetic show?

Starting to agreep with my uncle, she's s sham conservative.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Star you that ***** Megyn Kelly attacks trump every single episode of her pathetic show?

Starting to agreep with my uncle, she's s sham conservative.

I"ve only started watching her show recently but last night after debate she sure didn't seem to be attacking Trump or other conservatives. IF anything, she seemed happy that the bias of the liberal moderators and left-wing media has been exposed.

I still can't get over the utter ridiculousness of Rob's "He only embarassed himself" comment. Does he live in an alternate reality from the rest of us? He must live in one (like BIzarro world) if he really thinks Cruz "embarassed himself":

http://www.aol.com/article/2015/10/29/cruz-campaign-sees-fundraising-spike-after-debate/21256128/?icid=maing-grid7%7Cmain5%7Cdl3%7Csec3_Ink3%26pLid%3D-566125242

Yeah, sure. He "embarassed himself". 😂

I"m sure Rob'll be saying something about "micro-penises" now. LOL.

Originally posted by Star428
I"ve only started watching her show recently but last night after debate she sure didn't seem to be attacking Trump or other conservatives. IF anything, she seemed happy that the bias of the liberal moderators and left-wing media has been exposed.

I still can't get over the utter ridiculousness of Rob's "He only embarassed himself" comment. Does he live in an alternate reality from the rest of us? He must live in one (like BIzarro world) if he really thinks Cruz "embarassed himself":

http://www.aol.com/article/2015/10/29/cruz-campaign-sees-fundraising-spike-after-debate/21256128/?icid=maing-grid7%7Cmain5%7Cdl3%7Csec3_Ink3%26pLid%3D-566125242

Yeah, sure. He "embarassed himself". 😂

I"m sure Rob'll be saying something about "micro-penises" now. LOL.

I had to see what she had to say tonight, she was giving Trump a hard time again about some bogus bullshit. I hate turning to her channel to give her views but I guess I just want to be disgusted by her.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
I had to see what she had to say tonight, she was giving Trump a hard time again about some bogus bullshit. I hate turning to her channel to give her views but I guess I just want to be disgusted by her.

Sadly, the choices I have for tv news (besides my local channels) in my cable line up are either biased left-wing sources (like CNN, whom I will never trust again) or FOX. FOX is the lesser of the two evils, imo. I don't watch television all that much though. I get most of my news online from sources like Newsmax, AOL, Red Flag News, and Conservative TRibune. I didn't watch her show tonight.

What upsets me about CNN is they have some good journalists, but allowing CNBC hosts to get on their network and host this was god aweful.

Like that whoopie golderberg thing with the view, I heard about that on CNN.

Yeah I actually tried to watch this debate but couldn't find it. Thought it was on CNN then found out it was on CNBC....so yeah fug that.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Yeah I actually tried to watch this debate but couldn't find it. Thought it was on CNN then found out it was on CNBC....so yeah fug that. [/B]

It was actually on CNN, because no one watches CNBC unless it shark tank.

Like there is a diff.