Asgardian Destroyer vs Galactus in a fist fight

IMO Galactus and Odin aren't peers. They are relatively close in power in suppose, but Galactus would win every time they fought. That isn't a peer, that's a tier above imo.

Originally posted by Genii96
I thought he feeds off blossoming planets?

Ah,so basically,he was even weaker than he would normally be,when he feeds on a normal planet once a month?...basically odin took on less than average galactus,and got his ass kicked,good to know

Haha, what? Galactus was sated.

Nowhere in the comic it was stated that consuming a dead planet made him weaker.

That's some asinine logic on itself.

Originally posted by Genii96
Ah,so basically,he was even weaker than he would normally be,when he feeds on a normal planet once a month?...basically odin took on less than average galactus,and got his ass kicked,good to know

Keeper was leading Galactus to green worlds with no life on them and Galactus said they only barely are getting the job done, not only does he need living worlds, he needs then to be populated with life forms to get the full effect out of them :

Originally posted by abhilegend
Haha, what? Galactus was sated.

Nowhere in the comic it was stated that consuming a dead planet made him weaker.

That's some asinine logic on itself.

Galactus wins this one comfortably.

Galactus feeds on the biospheric energy of a planet,the greater the ability of that planet to support life,the more he gets out of it,hence one of the reasons he is fixiated on earth. A dead planet has no support for life and is on its own 'dead'. The amount of energy he would get from that,would be less than one he would get from a healthy planet..:ence why he usually feeds on populated planets,ofcourse if anyone who actually knew what galactus feeds on were to actually type,he wouldn't type BS comments. But hey coming from someone who believes celestials are skyfather levels,its not much of a problem.

And a well fed galactus shits on the destroyer worse than a celestial would

In this scenario he's well fed, inless something changed in the lsdt couple pages that i didnt catch.
I mean, this IS fisticuffs, but he's going to do well.

Originally posted by zopzop
The populated world > living world > dead world thing was even mentioned on panel, but it was from an alternate reality.

Keeper was leading Galactus to green worlds with no life on them and Galactus said they only barely are getting the job done, not only does he need living worlds, he needs then to be populated with life forms to get the full effect out of them :

That's an alternate reality. Meaningless.

But he DID eat a dead world. I even said he wasn't hungry, but he also wasn't optimal.

Where did he say that he wasn't optimal or some shit?

Originally posted by Genii96
Galactus feeds on the biospheric energy of a planet,the greater the ability of that planet to support life,the more he gets out of it,hence one of the reasons he is fixiated on earth. A dead planet has no support for life and is on its own 'dead'. The amount of energy he would get from that,would be less than one he would get from a healthy planet..:ence why he usually feeds on populated planets,ofcourse if anyone who actually knew what galactus feeds on were to actually type,he wouldn't type BS comments. But hey coming from someone who believes celestials are skyfather levels,its not much of a problem.

Originally posted by Genii96
And a well fed galactus shits on the destroyer worse than a celestial would

Galactus isn't that powerful.

I'm imagining that a 2000ft tall Destroyer would be significantly less durable. Maybe it's just me though.

Why do you say that?

Well the Destroyer would be much larger, and thus it's surface area would become larger making it less durable and easier to punch a hole through. Then again it's magical so maybe not.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
IMO Galactus and Odin aren't peers. They are relatively close in power in suppose, but Galactus would win every time they fought. That isn't a peer, that's a tier above imo.

I agree. I think that comparing the two would be like comparing the Surfer to Wonder Man.