Planned Parenthood CEO Pounded

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Your guess is as good as mine.

The jets and the 600k salary actually bother me a whole lot more then anything else this organization might of done.

I mean if I wanted to get PP shut down I'd go after them for that just as much as anything else because that is ridiculous. Nobody from PP is so important they need private jets. Unless they are paying for the jets themselves out of their 600k salary. But why do I get the feeling they are not doing that?

This isn't just specific to PP though, the government just overall wastes a lot of money on stupid shit since the government has a big habit of spending money on lavish shit they don't need.

Originally posted by Surtur
The jets and the 600k salary actually bother me a whole lot more then anything else this organization might of done.

I mean if I wanted to get PP shut down I'd go after them for that just as much as anything else because that is ridiculous. Nobody from PP is so important they need private jets. Unless they are paying for the jets themselves out of their 600k salary. But why do I get the feeling they are not doing that?

This isn't just specific to PP though, the government just overall wastes a lot of money on stupid shit since the government has a big habit of spending money on lavish shit they don't need.

Notice how none of the liberals here care? They just say "oh that doesn't bother me."Classic dismissing and approval even though it's dead wrong. What on earth do they need private jets for besides the selling and transporting body parts?

You were asked already, how much do you think the CEO of PP should make and why that number?

To me, 600k doesn't seem like a whole lot considering how huge PP is and she's the CEO. The CEO of my company makes around $400-450k and my company is MUCH smaller than PP.

And the private jets?

So you're just going to avoid the hard questions by asking more questions. Very dishonest of you.

Jets: CEOs of huge companies used planes a lot. They fly to conventions, they make social and business connections, they have to appear in front of a committee of witch-hunters because of nonsense fabricated videos etc.

Now if it's shown she used the company's money for non business fun, sure, that's shitty and she should get dinged for that.

You didn't ask me a hard question, its my thread I was asking the questions and asking for responses, nice job picking up the bardocks and q99's "you lied cause we have a difference of opinion."

Wont work.

Then it should be easy to answer. This is the question I asked: "how much do you think the CEO of PP should make and why that number?"

As you're complaining about her salary. So, what do you feel her salary should be and how did you come to that figure?

Originally posted by Robtard
Then it should be easy to answer. This is the question I asked: "how much do you think the CEO of PP should make and why that number?"

As you're complaining about her salary. So, what do you feel her salary should be and how did you come to that figure?

Anything over $100,000 is to much. And they should not have private planes.

you're entitled to your opinions, of course. however i'm still not clear on what this would prove, assuming your implications are correct and there is indeed lavish frivolous spending among the top executives.

what i mean is, lets say they shitcan the c.e.o. and promise to fly business class from now on. that would kinda take the steam out of the controversy here, wouldn't it?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Anything over $100,000 is to much. And they should not have private planes.

Under 100K for being the CEO of a large company. I laughed.

Anyhow, how did you come to this figure?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
you're entitled to your opinions, of course. however i'm still not clear on what this would prove, assuming your implications are correct and there is indeed lavish frivolous spending among the top executives.

what i mean is, lets say it's true and they shitcan the c.e.o. and promise to fly business class from now on. that would kinda take the steam out of the controversy here, wouldn't it?

Its the flaunting of it, especially in the videos, talking about buying lambos and Ferraris.

Can you find a good excuse for them to need private jets?

Originally posted by Robtard
Under 100K for being the CEO of a large company? The reason(s) for this?

They are a government funded non profit, they should be getting rich off us. Why should she make more then Obama?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Its the flaunting of it, especially in the videos, talking about buying lambos and Ferraris.

Can you find a good excuse for them to need private jets?

pretty sure most people don't consider a c.e.o. flying a corporate jet to be the stuff of controversy. now if they used the private jet to fly to a vacation home in aruba, or to their kid's bar mitzvah, that would be the stuff of outrage and controversy.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
pretty sure most people don't consider a c.e.o. flying a corporate jet to be the stuff of controversy. now if they used the private jet to fly to a vacation home in aruba, or to their kid's bar mitzvah, that would be the stuff of outrage and controversy.

This isn't a corporation, its a government funded non profit organization. Who should be worried about saving money not spending $15,000 a day on travel.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
They are a government funded non profit, they should be getting rich off us. Why should she make more then Obama?

Funded and self sustained, not all their money comes from the government. It's still a job and the job responsibility dictates (usually) the wage. As noted, she makes a loss less than other non profit CEOs.

The POTUS salary doesn't make much sense to me, but the POTUS also doesn't really pay for anything himself(herself when Hilldog wins) while in office. Boarding, meals, travel, healtchcare etc, all covered, so his/her salary is actually MUCH higher when factoring in what they're not paying for.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
This isn't a corporation, its a government funded non profit organization.

since when are 'corporation' and 'organization' mutually exclusive? how would one explain non-profit corporations, then?

Originally posted by Robtard
Funded and self sustained, not all their money comes from the government. It's still a job and the job responsibility dictates (usually) the wage. As noted, she makes a loss less than other non profit CEOs.

The POTUS salary doesn't make much sense to me, but the POTUS also doesn't really pay for anything himself(herself when Hilldog wins) while in office. Boarding, meals, travel, healtchcare etc, all covered, so his/her salary is actually MUCH higher when factoring in what they're not paying for.

If they didn't get most of their money from the government there would not be a huge shut down controversy ove this.

Nice bringing up Hilary and winning, I see you ditched your boy Sanders.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
since when are 'corporation' and 'organization' mutually exclusive? how would one explain non-profit corporations, then?

PP takes their surplus and gives it to the politicians they keep them baby killers alive. We all know this. What else is there to say?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
If they didn't get most of their money from the government there would not be a huge shut down controversy ove this.

Nice bringing up Hilary and winning, I see you ditched your boy Sanders.

What you just said doesn't do away with what I said.

You're talking nonsense again. Hilldog winning is just a very likely reality; my personal preference of Sanders over her doesn't change that.

Look at you looking for the legal loopholes for a win. I'll remember that when you talk about taxes..