Military punishes soldier for beating down a child rapist allied commander

Started by Surtur3 pages

Military punishes soldier for beating down a child rapist allied commander

Just like the title says. Captain Dan Quinn learned an allied commander had a boy chained to his bed as a sex slave. The Captain called in the commander and confronted him, in which the guy laughed in his face. So Dan threw him to the ground and WHOOPED his ass.

What does the military do? Just go on and take a guess:

http://dallasmorningviewsblog.dallasnews.com/2015/09/army-captain-dan-quinn-is-a-hero-for-trying-to-stop-child-rape-why-isnt-the-u-s-military-treating-him-like-one.html/

Dude was relieved of his command. Again: a captain was relieved of his command for beating down an allied commander for laughing about having a child sex slave chained to his bed. This same guy also stepped in when a 14 yr. old girl was being raped. The punishment for the rapist? Why..a whole day in prison.

The bull f*cking shit excuse given? It's their culture.

Obama has passed orders throughout the whole military to be tolerant and turn a blind eye. This is no surprise.

Obama being the same tool who said we were the #1 respected country. No, this makes us look like pieces of dog shit.

This is a duplicate thread: http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=616494

Ah yeah, didn't see it because it's over a month old. Kind of makes me sick this happened a month ago at least and yet it seems nothing has been done about it.

But why the hell isn't this all over the news? Why wasn't it a month ago? I don't remember seeing shit about it or hearing much about it at all. Yet I see 18 billion stories about Hilary and her god damn emails.

Originally posted by Surtur
Ah yeah, didn't see it because it's over a month old.

No ones cares, anything that makes a Muslim look bad, they ignore.

It's just messed up, I'm not bothered if nobody here cares, but I can't see how I could of missed such a big story if it was played in the news and given the attention it deserves.

Since like I said..18 billion articles and news reports about Hilary's emails, but this keeps the media quiet. Or maybe the media wasn't quiet and I just missed it.

Before I go on did anyone actually confirm the Afghan was doing what he was being accused of?

Originally posted by Newjak
Before I go on did anyone actually confirm the Afghan was doing what he was being accused of?

I don't know, but since the guy has also been on record as saving a 14 yr. old girl from rape...it'd be weird if he lied. Which of course like I said..the punishment for that was a day in jail and then being forced to marry the girl. So now she is married to her rapist.

These are our allies ladies and gentlemen. These are the people where this is apparently a part of their "culture".

Originally posted by Surtur
I don't know, but since the guy has also been on record as saving a 14 yr. old girl from rape...it'd be weird if he lied.
You can be right in one instance and wrong in another. The article only mentions that when the American soldier confronted him the Afghan laughed... then the beatdown commenced. So does that mean that the American took the laughter to signal guilt? Was more said after the laughing? Because other than that the article only mentions that the soldier heard that the ranking afghan soldier had a child sex slave. There is nothing saying they did find the accused to be committing the acts they were accused of.

Also it sounds like the people in this article vs the other thread are different people. At least the names appeared to be different when I glanced at them.

They didn't say they found no evidence either. Why would the commander laugh in the face of someone accusing him of raping a child? Seems weird if that wasn't the case.

But anyways, lets say for now it is 100% true. How would you react?

Originally posted by Newjak
You can be right in one instance and wrong in another. The article only mentions that when the American soldier confronted him the Afghan laughed... then the beatdown commenced. So does that mean that the American took the laughter to signal guilt? Was more said after the laughing? Because other than that the article only mentions that the soldier heard that the ranking afghan soldier had a child sex slave. There is nothing saying they did find the accused to be committing the acts they were accused of.

Also it sounds like the people in this article vs the other thread are different people. At least the names appeared to be different when I glanced at them.

This was the story I posted.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/08/21/army-kicking-out-decorated-green-beret-who-stood-up-for-afghan-rape-victim/?intcmp=hplnws

Originally posted by Surtur
They didn't say they found no evidence either. Why would the commander laugh in the face of someone accusing him of raping a child? Seems weird if that wasn't the case.

But anyways, lets say for now it is 100% true. How would you react?

That's a terrible assumption to make though. It's supposed to be innocent until proven guilty. Perhaps he thought the American Soldier was making a joke about him. Or he thought the accusation was so out there all he could do was laugh at it.

If it was true or I had evidence to prove it was true I would have detained the Afghan soldier and with an armed unit retrieved the child from the room then handed the Afghan soldier over to the appropriate authorities.

But you aren't thinking about this in context: this is a part of their culture. So why would the commander think the guy was joking? If part of your culture is raping kids and you have an army guy come confront you about raping kids..well, laughing does make you seem guilty.

You also spoke of innocent until proven guilty. But nah, screw that. It shouldn't apply to people from places where their culture accepts this. Also here is the kink in the plan of informing the authorities: they put a dude in jail for one day for raping a girl and then forced her to marry him. Those are the authorities you'd hand him over to?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
No ones cares, anything that makes a Muslim look bad, they ignore.

Who are you referring to?

Originally posted by Robtard
Who are you referring to?

All liberals.

Originally posted by Surtur
But you aren't thinking about this in context: this is a part of their culture. So why would the commander think the guy was joking? If part of your culture is raping kids and you have an army guy come confront you about raping kids..well, laughing does make you seem guilty.

You also spoke of innocent until proven guilty. But nah, screw that. It shouldn't apply to people from places where their culture accepts this. Also here is the kink in the plan of informing the authorities: they put a dude in jail for one day for raping a girl and then forced her to marry him. Those are the authorities you'd hand him over to?

I think you missed the point... the point being if the American Soldier was wrong then he just beat up an innocent man. Which is a problem. The context as presented in the article is that the Soldier confronted a man then attacked that man. We don't know based on that article if the soldier was correct or not.

Would you harm a person simply for having an accusation brought up against them?

I'm not saying ignore a potential problem but you just can't beat people up because you think they might be guilty. That kind of action is exactly what we are trying to change in the middle east. The article itself make no mention of whether or not it was proven the committed the action.

And this is a major problem with the article. It condemns a man and raises another on a pedestal without this Afghan getting a trial or any other form or chance to defend. He was subject to one man's judgement before he got beat up/

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
All liberals.
Then that was a lie, as in your thread, OV, Bentley, B42 and myself (all people you label as "Liberals"😉 expressed remorse/concern over the soldier being punished for doing the right thing, beating up a pedo-rapist.

You realize, the word lie here means nothing. You three don't count as a majority. Just like you say my vote for trump doesn't matter. Your three opinions don't matter.

Fail at "lie" tactics.

their opinions are very relevant if they are being personally misrepresented.