8 year old girl shot by 11 year old boy

Originally posted by Bardock42
I disagree, I think I have very much clarified many different aspects that contribute to violence. This reaction doesn't have to do with the story at all, it's solely the word, and it would happen exactly like that in any other case (and I know, because it basically happens every time sexism or misogyny is brought up).

Again this statement "I think this has definitely a misogynist component." has brought on the extreme reactions by everyone (comparing the sentence to the actual shooting, why bring up "horseshit gender politics", it's in poor taste, starting a barrage of sexist jokes, calling it irresponsible).

The only way it is irresponsible is that it brings out the latent sexism in posters, and tbh, I don't view that as a bad thing.

you don't respond in any real depth to any level headed objections people have raised to your extremist over-analysis of a relatively mundane human tragedy. it is almost as if you don't believe your own bs, but merely post it so that when people inevitably object you can step back and go "aha! misogyny!"

Originally posted by red g jacks
😂

you don't respond in any real depth to any level headed objections people have raised to your extremist over-analysis of a relatively mundane human tragedy. it is almost as if you don't believe your own bs, but merely post it so that when people inevitably object you can step back and go "aha! misogyny!"

This has zero "misogynist component" about it. Its deplorable that you would even bring this up in something so tragic, to just push your misogynist agenda and beliefs on the forum. I doubt you even care about the story, nor did you report on it correctly. You lied about the article, it states no such thing in the tragedy. A shameful and deceitful post with no substance in which you made the claim.

There is no proof an any misogyny in this article, its a complete lie and a shameful way to push feminism.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I disagree, I think I have very much clarified many different aspects that contribute to violence. This reaction doesn't have to do with the story at all, it's solely the word, and it would happen exactly like that in any other case (and I know, because it basically happens every time sexism or misogyny is brought up).

Again this statement "I think this has definitely a misogynist component." has brought on the extreme reactions by everyone (comparing the sentence to the actual shooting, why bring up "horseshit gender politics", it's in poor taste, starting a barrage of sexist jokes, calling it irresponsible).

The only way it is irresponsible is that it brings out the latent sexism in posters, and tbh, I don't view that as a bad thing.

You didn't clarify anything and now you are playing a the role of a coward, in my absence you wanted to name drop and troll me whenever you could and now you realize I'm back and are being shameful and hiding cause you know I will destroy you in this.

No need to spam what you already put, TI.

Originally posted by Ushgarak
No need to spam what you already put, TI.

He was trolling and name dropping me for a week and you didn't do anything about it. He better start posting something or I will continue to call his bs out.

I was referring to the two posts before your last- one an exact repeat of what you posted earlier and one a paraphrase of the same thing, adding nothing to what you had already done. Don't do that. Responding like you then did is different- but I am not convinced by your trolling accusation there. People are allowed to comment on your general posting content.

Originally posted by Ushgarak
I was referring to the two posts before your last- one an exact repeat of what you posted earlier and one a paraphrase of the same thing, adding nothing to what you had already done. Don't do that. Responding like you then did is different- but I am not convinced by your trolling accusation there. People are allowed to comment on your general posting content.

Baiting is a form of trolling, which he has done. Which you have told me not to do in the past.

anyone ever told you the story of the boy who cried 'wolf'?

Reported

i suppose not.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
He was trolling and name dropping me for a week and you didn't do anything about it. He better start posting something or I will continue to call his bs out.

Additionally, I did not misstate what this article has said, I have made it very clear that it is my reading and my opinion of the story, no one else's.

Originally posted by Bardock42
This is just not true, I mentioned you once in regards to a statement psmith had made previously. I replied to two posts that referenced you. And I replied to two threads where you had posted recently and referenced your arguments.

Additionally, I did not misstate what this article has said, I have made it very clear that it is my reading and my opinion of the story, no one else's.

You just admitted you did, so you said "thats not true" then just admitted to it. As far as your rubbish misogyny claim, you have zero proof for you claim.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
You just admitted you did, so you said "thats not true" then just admitted to it. As far as your rubbish misogyny claim, you have zero proof for you claim.

No, I said I replied to things when they came up, I did most definitely not bait you. You going on a hiatus for a week doesn't make everyone stop talking about the things you said just recently. I for one didn't realize you had taken a longer absence until like 2 days ago, when Star posted a Volkswagen article for you (I mean, we all know your recent preoccupation with Germany is solely because you are trying to troll me, although I applaud it, I think it's good you are broadening your horizon).

I have provided reasons why I think misogyny (not individual hatred of women, but systemic disrespect towards women) played a role. I've given statistics that I think support my view, and explained how it fits into other observations about interactions between boys and girls. Can I prove 100% that this story is really related to this, no, of course not, I never claimed I could however.

Originally posted by Bardock42
No, I said I replied to things when they came up, I did most definitely not bait you. You going on a hiatus for a week doesn't make everyone stop talking about the things you said just recently. I for one didn't realize you had taken a longer absence until like 2 days ago, when Star posted a Volkswagen article for you (I mean, we all know your recent preoccupation with Germany is solely because you are trying to troll me, although I applaud it, I think it's good you are broadening your horizon).

I have provided reasons why I think misogyny (not individual hatred of women, but systemic disrespect towards women) played a role. I've given statistics that I think support my view, and explained how it fits into other observations about interactions between boys and girls. Can I prove 100% that this story is really related to this, no, of course not, I never claimed I could however.

You have zero proof to back your claim and now you are changing the subject because you have been caught.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
i suppose not.

This is insane, there's two topics I'm replying to, both brought up by you.

1. He (me) was trolling and name dropping me for a week

I explained that that is not correct.

2. You (I) have zero proof to back your claim

I explained to you that I posted things that I think support my argument. And reiterated that I am aware that I can not prove it.

Originally posted by Bardock42
This is insane, there's two topics I'm replying to, both brought up by you.

1. He (me) was trolling and name dropping me for a week

I explained that that is not correct.

2. You (I) have zero proof to back your claim

I explained to you that I posted things that I think support my argument. And reiterated that I am aware that I can not prove it.

stop trolling, you trolly troll!

LEAVE TI ALONE!!!!!!

Originally posted by Bardock42
This is insane, there's two topics I'm replying to, both brought up by you.

1. He (me) was trolling and name dropping me for a week

I explained that that is not correct.

2. You (I) have zero proof to back your claim

I explained to you that I posted things that I think support my argument. And reiterated that I am aware that I can not prove it.

You were name dropping me, which is baiting, which is trolling.

You brought up Star and VW which is off topic.

Clear now?

You have not backed your claim and you have no source for your claim.