Dooku, Maul, Talzin vs Sidious and Grievous

Started by Kurk15 pages
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
Yes it defintily wasn't a crushing defeat. Grevious put up a rather good fight with the saber.

Originally posted by Kurk
It was a legit win unlike Vader against Ezra and Kanan.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It was a legit win unlike Vader against Ezra and Kanan.

After looking at the fight again maul won with the use of his force powers. This was a one on one no outside interference battle and it could be that Grevious was distracted but that's also a stretch. However after looking at the fight Grevious was able to go toe to toe or stalemate him with the blade so maul isn't Crushing here.

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
After looking at the fight again maul won with the use of his force powers. This was a one on one no outside interference battle and it could be that Grevious was distracted but that's also a stretch. However after looking at the fight Grevious was able to go toe to toe or stalemate him with the blade so maul isn't Crushing here.
He is crushing here. He's far better with his saber than Grievous is.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He is crushing here. He's far better with his saber than Grievous is.
Proof?

Originally posted by quanchi112
He is crushing here. He's far better with his saber than Grievous is.

Then why didn't he beat him with his saber then if he is so obviously better?

Originally posted by Sinious
Proof?
Continuity.

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
Then why didn't he beat him with his saber then if he is so obviously better?
He won unlike Vader against Ezra and Kanan.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Continuity.
of your imagination?

Originally posted by Sinious
of your imagination?
do not be absurd.

Grievous cannot stand before the higher Sith or Jedi. He's weak.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He won unlike Vader against Ezra and Kanan.

But why not with his saber? If he is so obviously better than Grevious, why didn't he just crush him with his saber if he was so much better?

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
But why not with his saber? If he is so obviously better than Grevious, why didn't he just crush him with his saber if he was so much better?
Same reason Anakin doesn't crush Ventress every time their sabers clash. Maul won and he crushes him, easily.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Same reason Anakin doesn't crush Ventress every time their sabers clash. Maul won and he crushes him, easily.

That's not a reason. That would just mean that Ventress is better than we originally thought. Also Ventress has actually defeated Anakin with the saber so really your answer isn't a good answer. Grevious wasn't overpowered by the blade, but by the force which he has no defense to. So it's not easy for anyone.

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
That's not a reason. That would just mean that Ventress is better than we originally thought. Also Ventress has actually defeated Anakin with the saber so really your answer isn't a good answer. Grevious wasn't overpowered by the blade, but by the force which he has no defense to. So it's not easy for anyone.
So you don't believe Anakin is greater than Ventress despite him obviously being better. Grievous never had a defense against the force but neither do the Jedi and Sith. It's all about timing and always has been. You don't grasp Star Wars.

quan wins again

Originally posted by ILS
quan wins again

Oh, I don't think so. One does not simply beat ES2 into submission.

Originally posted by ares834
Dude. You've wasted way to much time on Quan. Just put him on ignore and move on with your life.

Don't I know it.

Originally posted by TheNuisanceBird
Oh, I don't think so. One does not simply beat ES2 into submission.
I already have in multiple threads.

I make the impossible possible.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Don't I know it.
We both know my hold over you is too strong.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So you don't believe Anakin is greater than Ventress despite him obviously being better. Grievous never had a defense against the force but neither do the Jedi and Sith. It's all about timing and always has been. You don't grasp Star Wars.

What we think doesn't matter. What we see is. We see that Ventress has fought Anakin and defeated him and contended. In my previous post I said she was better than we originally thought, not better than Anakin. Um that is a lie. Jedi and Sith have force shields and even if they didn't what do you call this https://youtu.be/9pI8IkWa3LQ 2:03-2:04

https://youtu.be/Hx4m6lvpgKY 0:20-0:23 1:00-1:07

How about tutamintis as well.

I think I grasp it much more than you have or ever will. You don't even understand the force sheild concept.