Originally posted by Star428
They want a socialist so-called "utopia" and they will break any law to achieve it..
Except they aren't breaking laws, they're trying to pass laws.
They don't care about the Constitution,
Once again, you're trying to define 'being an undocumented immigrant' as a crime, which is itself unconstitutional. The constitution, actually, says very little about immigration. It *does* have a claus about general welfare.
Unconstitutional does not mean 'disagrees with Star,' nor does constitutional mean 'agrees with Star.'
God,
False, most are Christian, and taking care of your fellow man has a *lot* of material in the Bible.
Here's a Jesus quote for you, Matthew 25:41
"Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee? 40 And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done [it] unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done [it] unto me. 41Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels: 42For I was an hungred, and ye gave me no meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me no drink: 43I was a stranger, and ye took me not in: naked, and ye clothed me not: sick, and in prison, and ye visited me not. "
Jesus flat-out says, for not feeding and clothing a stranger, you get cast into everlasting fire. And that how you treat the least of people, is how you treat Jesus.
Poor immigrants, refugees, and the like, strike me as the 'least.' Jesus did not say, 'feed, cloth, and provide drink to the least, except for this lot,' after all.
individual rights,
False, they view many of their policies as a way to help individual rights. *You* may disagree, but that doesn't change their view.
In the case of gay marriage and such, that's clearing adding additional rights.
or any of the principles our Republic was founded on.
General welfare is in the constitution, 'all are created equal,' voting to decide what to do which is how they want to implement stuff, etc..
They're about as anti-American as anyone can get.
You're defining anti-American as anti-your side.
Oh, they also want bigger government. Bigger government means less freedom for individuals.
False, not inherent at all. Protecting people's freedoms involves having people to guard them. Stuff like more access to education increases freedom. Requiring higher wages lowers corporate freedom but raising individual freedom, preventing wage-slave conditions, etc..
Note that, say, the higher rax rates and such? Ones that the US has used before, not new. If America has used them before for decades at a time, including under Republicans, why didn't they cause horrible effects back then?
Also note the government expanded more under Bush than Obama.
As government expands, liberty contracts- Ronald Reagan (one of the wisest C-in-C's we've ever had; Republican, btw🙂)
Says Reagan. Many Americans disagree, and I think the ones who disagree are right.
Don't confuse your opinion or the opinion of those who agree with you as an absolute, or what defines America.
The Constitution has a section that the government can act in the general welfare of the American people, and the founding father who set it down was quite clear that this meant that the government should help people out, as long as it's in general. Some founding fathers definitely disagree with you, in parts that got in to the constitution, so saying it's Anti-American/anti-American Principles/Anti-Constitution is all false- it's just American principles that have been there since day 1 that you, personally, do not emphasize as much.