Should Syrian refugees be allowed into the US

Started by Flyattractor15 pages
Originally posted by Bardock42
Why do conservatives associate spanking with sex? Yikes...

Coming from a guy using a Rick Avatar...That's almost funny.

🤣
💃

Maybe just keep your fetishes private?

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Coming from a guy using a Rick Avatar...That's almost funny.

🤣
💃 [/B]

😂

Can't see turning down 65,000 desperately needy people because of the off chance a few of them might be terrorist. Just have to be extreme with the vetting process.

We allowed 120K+ Cuban immigrants/asylum seekers into the US in 1980, knowing there would likely be a small number of lunatics and hardened criminals mixed in. That seemed to work out.

lol, who was it that called that Fly would take up Star's place in TI's cheerleading squad?

Originally posted by Robtard
Can't see turning down 65,000 desperately needy people because of the off chance a few of them might be terrorist.

We allowed 120K+ Cuban immigrants/asylum seekers into the US in 1980, knowing there would likely be a small number of lunatics and hardened criminals mixed in. That seemed to work out.

Yeah, you got a pretty awesome film out of it, too.

Is a great film, but I was mainly talking about the Cuban food.

Originally posted by Bardock42
lol, who was it that called that Fly would take up Star's place in TI's cheerleading squad?

Does a 😂 rustle your jimmies that much? It appears it does. Get some tougher skin.

Originally posted by Robtard
Can't see turning down 65,000 desperately needy people because of the off chance a few of them might be terrorist. Just have to be extreme with the vetting process.

We allowed 120K+ Cuban immigrants/asylum seekers into the US in 1980, knowing there would likely be a small number of lunatics and hardened criminals mixed in. That seemed to work out.


Why is it Liberals don't mind shoring up their moral high ground on the bodies of the victims their policies get killed?

While I realize you're just a troll mocking the Rightwing Radicals on this site, you do bring up a good question.

Is helping the needy despite some possible risks just a Liberal move? Shouldn't helping the needy be a Conservative moral foundation, considering they're the party that likes to name-drop "Christian values" more often?

Originally posted by Robtard
While I realize you're just a troll mocking the Rightwing Radicals on this site, you do bring up a good question.

Is helping the needy despite some possible risks just a Liberal move? Shouldn't helping the needy be a Conservative moral foundation, considering they're the party that likes to name-drop "Christian values" more often?

Well the Christian Aspect of Helping is doing it in a way that Helps people make it so they can take care of themselves. Not put them on preeminent welfare status and a burden on others. Its called Self Reliance.

That was a somewhat decent avoiding the issue dance.

But the first step here in regards with these refuges is letting them into the US, so they then can begin to integrate themselves, go to school, get jobs and contribute to society, or as you put it, become "self reliant". 🙂

So the new Definition of Refugee is now Illegal Immigrant? They all have to become Citizens of the country that gets stuck with them? Why can't they GO HOME when the trouble has died down?

And as for dodging the question. With Liberals. The Trouble their actions cause never seems to affect them all that much. Seeing as how they are all Rich 1 %-ers.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]So the new Definition of Refugee is now Illegal Immigrant?

They all have to become Citizens of the country that gets stuck with them? Why can't they GO HOME when the trouble has died down?

And as for dodging the question. With Liberals. The Trouble their actions cause never seems to affect them all that much. Seeing as how they are all Rich 1 %-ers. [/B]

Are you not aware that the Syrian refuges are seeking asylum because they're fleeing from a massively war-torn country. It's not just some dude who woke up one day and said "meh, think I've go to the US for shits and giggles".

Good question. But if they properly integrated into US society, got jobs, pay taxes and especially brought in needed skills (nurses, carpentry, teachers etc) with them, why should they leave? Why would you want them to leave? Worked out well for Florida in the 80's with the Cuban wave.

That's just another empty and ridiculous claim meant to distract.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Well the Christian Aspect of Helping is doing it in a way that Helps people make it so they can take care of themselves. Not put them on preeminent welfare status and a burden on others. Its called Self Reliance. [/B]

Oh, I see you are a follower of "Supply Side Jesus"...

Originally posted by Robtard
Are you not aware that the Syrian refuges are seeking asylum because they're fleeing from a massively war-torn country. It's not just some dude who woke up one day and said "meh, think I've go to the US for shits and giggles".

Good question. But if they properly integrated into US society, got jobs, pay taxes and especially brought in needed skills (nurses, carpentry, teachers etc) with them, why should they leave? Why would you want them to leave? Worked out well for Florida in the 80's with the Cuban wave.

That's just another empty and ridiculous claim meant to distract.

Wars don't last forever. Why can't people fix their own countries instead of abandoning them? Pure Lazyness. And not all of these Peacefufl Refugees Integrate into their Host Countries. A lot of them try to change said countries to more resemble their own. See France for an example.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Oh, I see you are a follower of "Supply Side Jesus"...

So you follow the Permenent Underclass Side jesus then?

I do think Jesus' teachings are insanely communist....if that's what you mean...

Apparently Maryland has banned entrance to Syrian refugees and other states are doing so as well.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I do think Jesus' teachings are insanely communist....if that's what you mean...

Except for the fact that they weren't.

You just wish they were.

Nah, they were, that's why the Catholic Church needed to make sure absolutely no one reads the Bible but their people, and why the sirght wing conservatives struggle so much to redefine Jesus within their moral framework, cause he's basically against them.