Given that Luke was stomped, a few years before DE, by an inferior Force user than Vader, and considering that his best feat by that time was surpassed by a far from prime Vader who was also gravely wounded and having his suit badly damaged (suggesting he would be strained in keeping himself alive, given that he wouldn't be supported by it), I would doubt he is superior to Vader, or even on his level. As for the AT-AT feat, Vader wasn't defending himself from that fire before tearing the walker apart, unlike Luke, and he both crushed and lifted it, which is better than simply pushing it down. And honestly, disintegrating Lyleks is also better than anything Luke has done by that time. DE Luke has nothing to suggest he could replicate that.
Sabers probably goes either way, seeing as Vader is still a better duelist than Lumiya, Luuke Skywalker, and other random Marvel villains Luke fought in the comics. I don't think Luke saw a huge skill increase until the latter new Republic stuff
I'm surprised to see the development of Vader even beating EU Luke, can't say I disagree either with the majority verdict.
Originally posted by carthageDisappointing tbh.
Sabers probably goes either way, seeing as Vader is still a better duelist than Lumiya, Luuke Skywalker, and other random Marvel villains Luke fought in the comics. I don't think Luke saw a huge skill increase until the latter new Republic stuffI'm surprised to see the development of Vader even beating EU Luke, can't say I disagree either with the majority verdict.