Thor vs Hulk

Started by quanchi11217 pages

Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
I would never pay money to a forum to debate my nerdly views on fictional characters! lol. Maybe if I enjoyed the site and wanted to donate, that'd be one thing. But to be forced a sub to just post.....Wow..
It is a shitty site to boot.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He is just a troll who doesn't debate. He tries to but fails miserably.

😂

Lol.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Lol.
Learn from me, Padawan.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Learn from me, Padawan.
How to be a good cheerleader Vol. II -Quanchi112

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
How to be a good cheerleader Vol. II -Quanchi112
You conceded the debate to me, boy.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You conceded the debate to me, boy.
Your strawmen failed you, so I didn't.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Your strawmen failed you, so I didn't.
No, you asked me to prove things you yourself didn't believe which made no logical sense. I broke you.

Also about IM being amped to 400%. I never could figure out what this was supposed to mean. Did it mean he was 4 times stronger then his max? Or did it merely mean he had 4 times as much energy? In other words, the result would of been his suit would be able to run longer without running out of energy, but it otherwise would of been exactly the same.

Since nothing IM did seemed actually to be more powerful during that fight then stuff he has done before. His beams did not seem more potent nor did he seem physically stronger or tougher.

He had 400% energy reserves.

So then he wasn't really more powerful, just had a longer battery life.

Not necessarily. It might also mean he has more energy to power his attacks.

They left it ambiguous.

His repulsors were more powerful but his actual armor wouldnt have changed since he doesent use force fields. It was pretty obvious they were saying IM had to be roughly 5× just to hang with Thor. So I looked at it like his offensive was stronger but not sure about actual durability.

Originally posted by ShadowFyre
His repulsors were more powerful but his actual armor wouldnt have changed since he doesent use force fields. It was pretty obvious they were saying IM had to be roughly 5× just to hang with Thor. So I looked at it like his offensive was stronger but not sure about actual durability.
The durability didn't change, but the force of his physical attacks could have.

Yeah, more power output. Im surprised Tony doesent have shields. Strucker had them in AOU

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, you asked me to prove things you yourself didn't believe which made no logical sense. I broke you.
That's how debates work, DD. Lol.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
That's how debates work, DD. Lol.
I logically explained it to you but you already agreed with my conclusion thus you're trolling.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I logically explained it to you but you already agreed with my conclusion thus you're trolling.
Didn't happen.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Didn't happen.
You agreed the Hulkbuster armor was superior to his regular armor but asked me to prove the obvious. You're a troll.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You agreed the Hulkbuster armor was superior to his regular armor but asked me to prove the obvious. You're a troll.
It was 'obvious', yet you still haven't proved it. Lol.

Also, what was your point with the whole IM thing? Tony still knocked Hulk out. Another red herring I guess.