Battlezone challenge: Star Trek vs. Star Wars

Started by quanchi11212 pages

Originally posted by Darth Thor
^ Huh? I have no interest in this kind of battle. Star Trek can win this one, I'm really not bothered. And contrary to what you(Quan) might think, I actually am a fan of Abrams Star Trek. More so than Abrams Star Wars tbh.

I just argue against your lowballing of the elite Jedi/Sith, and your overstating of NuKhan.

If you want to do a Khan vs Ahsoka battlezone (or something similar) then you can PM me, as I don't see most your posts. In terms of a Ship to Ship battles I'll take on Vader in his Tie Fighter vs pretty much anyone else in any ship, as long as it's one on one and within reason (Like not Q, or some random Trek episode where someone's controlling a completely Invincible Ship).

You have raved about the space battles of the series. We've argued at length over what's greater with me supporting Lightsaber battles but you really get excited for the ship battles. You can pick the ot trilogy and argue for Vader as a pilot.

I've already argued Vader and Palpatine so that is a step backward. I also have no interest in such a b level Star Wars character who hasn't even seen a live action scene thus far.

Glad to hear you concede Trek wins though.

Originally posted by jaden101
Unless there's a sizable fleet battle in the new ST movie then they won't win this.

Even if there was, they won't win it, because of the space battle we see in Return of the Jedi.

And even using films only as evidence, Star Wars totally destroys Star Trek in terms of fire power, power generation, travel speeds and so on. Building the Death Star alone and moving it around at FTL speeds, completely eclipses anything ever done in the NuTrek movieverse.

Not even a contest.

Originally posted by Nai
Even if there was, they won't win it, because of the space battle we see in Return of the Jedi.

And even using films only as evidence, Star Wars totally destroys Star Trek in terms of fire power, power generation, travel speeds and so on. Building the Death Star alone and moving it around at FTL speeds, completely eclipses anything ever done in the NuTrek movieverse.

Not even a contest.

"If so powerful you are, why leave ?"

Originally posted by quanchi112
"If so powerful you are, why leave ?"

Lack of opponents.

Originally posted by Nai
Lack of opponents.
This will be a judged debate. Are you in or out ? Do not brag about victory but fail to step in the arena. I'm fully confident in Trek's superiority over either of the first two trilogies in an all out debate. Are you ?

Originally posted by quanchi112
This will be a judged debate.

Judged by who? How? When?


Are you in or out ?

I don't care enough to be in.


Do not brag about victory but fail to step in the arena. I'm fully confident in Trek's superiority over either of the first two trilogies in an all out debate. Are you ?

No. I'm not confident in Trek's superiority. 🙄

I'm very sorry to tell you, but I've stepped into a "SW vs ST" arena years ago, and completely destroyed the ST side. Educate yourself. You can also have it in the short version of "Enterprise-D vs a Star Destroyer" right here. Or just read through this site.

And there is nothing in NuTrack that helps ST win.

Originally posted by Nai
Judged by who? How? When?

I don't care enough to be in.

No. I'm not confident in Trek's superiority. 🙄

I'm very sorry to tell you, but I've stepped into a "SW vs ST" arena years ago, and completely destroyed the ST side. Educate yourself. You can also have it in the short version of "Enterprise-D vs a Star Destroyer" right here. Or just read through this site.

And there is nothing in NuTrack that helps ST win.

We can come to an agreement on who judges the debate. We'd have it this summer after we've both seen the Beyond. We'd set the stips, time, and the agree to three posters who hopefully would judge the debate without biased.

I have no interest in the old Trek. I find it abysmal save Spock prime and he's in NuTrek. That being said judging by the preview for a film you haven't seen you can't rightly say at this time. If you can then your bias knows no bounds. From what I've gathered from interviews this will give Trek the numbers it needs on screen.

This new villain Krall seems to be taking on the entire federation. They've already had the superior tech, ships, and progression so this IMO will confirm it. Do not lack the ambition or the passion to pass up on a new debate here. A new film and trilogy vs trilogy. If you were not intrigued at all you wouldn't have even posted here.

I'm confused, I thought Quan was the biggest STAR WARS fan eva? Why is he arguing for NuTrek?

Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
I'm confused, I thought Quan was the biggest STAR WARS fan eva? Why is he arguing for NuTrek?
I am the bridge to these two franchises on the battle boards like Abrams was in the directors chair.

NuTrek's trilogy will defeat either of these two Star Wars trilogies in combat. Anyone is welcome to disagree and try to prove otherwise.

Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
I'm confused, I thought Quan was the biggest STAR WARS fan eva? Why is he arguing for NuTrek?

Lol

Meh, Star Wars will forever dwarf Star Trek imo, nothing will ever change that. Not gonna waste time arguing about it on a battle board.

Originally posted by quanchi112
We can come to an agreement on who judges the debate. We'd have it this summer after we've both seen the Beyond. We'd set the stips, time, and the agree to three posters who hopefully would judge the debate without biased.

Still not interested.


I have no interest in the old Trek. I find it abysmal save Spock prime and he's in NuTrek. That being said judging by the preview for a film you haven't seen you can't rightly say at this time. If you can then your bias knows no bounds. From what I've gathered from interviews this will give Trek the numbers it needs on screen.

This new villain Krall seems to be taking on the entire federation. They've already had the superior tech, ships, and progression so this IMO will confirm it. Do not lack the ambition or the passion to pass up on a new debate here. A new film and trilogy vs trilogy. If you were not intrigued at all you wouldn't have even posted here.

Click on the second link I've posted.
A single Star-Destroyer could probably wipe out the entire fleet of the Federation in a space battle. The Empire brings dozens of those (ROTJ) with Rebel ships to match them (Home One). Add Vader's flagship and two Death Stars. No contest.

Star Trek is a centuries old civilization with hundreds to maybe a thousand or so systems in the Federation, with ships around half a kilometer long.

Star Wars is a millennia old civilization with tens of thousands of systems (at least), and ships a kilometer and a half long.

They also have faster FTL drive.

So Wars has more resources, bigger ships, and more of them.

I agree with those who've noted the only way Trek would win is if Q got involved.

And, of course, oldTrek is stronger than NuTrek, because of course TNG's Federation is bigger with a larger fleet than NuTrek's old ships. So a new foe beating NuTrek doesn't exactly change the scales any.

Originally posted by Nai
Judged by who? How? When?

I don't care enough to be in.

No. I'm not confident in Trek's superiority. 🙄

I'm very sorry to tell you, but I've stepped into a "SW vs ST" arena years ago, and completely destroyed the ST side. Educate yourself. You can also have it in the short version of "Enterprise-D vs a Star Destroyer" right here. Or just read through this site.

And there is nothing in NuTrack that helps ST win.

You're right about so called NuTrek so far. You'd be completely and utterly wrong to argue for star wars in a full canon debate. Trek has beings that can wipe out entire civilizations with a mere thought.

Originally posted by Q99
Star Trek is a centuries old civilization with hundreds to maybe a thousand or so systems in the Federation, with ships around half a kilometer long.

Star Wars is a millennia old civilization with tens of thousands of systems (at least), and ships a kilometer and a half long.

They also have faster FTL drive.

So Wars has more resources, bigger ships, and more of them.

I agree with those who've noted the only way Trek would win is if Q got involved.

And, of course, oldTrek is stronger than NuTrek, because of course TNG's Federation is bigger with a larger fleet than NuTrek's old ships. So a new foe beating NuTrek doesn't exactly change the scales any.

Total nonsense. The Borg alone have stated numbers far in excess of Star Wars. Millions of planets, billions of ships and trillions of drones. By comparison the katana fleet in the thrawn trilogy was said to be able to change the balance of power in the galaxy and it was only 500 clone Wars era ships. Their most common vessel, the cube, is bigger in every dimension than a Star Destroyer is long. Transwarp hubs allows travel across a comparable sized galaxy in minutes. The Douwd wipe out entire species with a thought. The krenim can wipe out entire civilizations with their time weapon by erasing them from ever existing. An unnamed civilisation built a Dyson sphere in ST that was the size of earth's orbit around the sun. A feat that is several hundred thousand times larger than the death star. 7 Small single pilot species 8472 ships can combine and do what the death star can do. A small fleet of ships did to a planet in seconds what a Star Destroyer Base delta zero attack takes hours. The defiant alone is stated to be able to lay waste to a planet

Trek has Wars beaten in numbers, firepower, superpowered beings. Everything.

Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
Meh, Star Wars will forever dwarf Star Trek imo, nothing will ever change that. Not gonna waste time arguing about it on a battle board.

It will probably always destroy it in popularity but in a battle that's another matter altogether. Arguing preferences is silly but arguing who wins carries with it glory. That's what battleboarders do.

Originally posted by Nai
Still not interested.

Click on the second link I've posted.
A single Star-Destroyer could probably wipe out the entire fleet of the Federation in a space battle. The Empire brings dozens of those (ROTJ) with Rebel ships to match them (Home One). Add Vader's flagship and two Death Stars. No contest.

Why not ? It's a fair judged debate.

Ridiculous. I've seen Star Wars movies and acting like these ships are the end all be all is foolish. The destroyers are slow and aren't known for their combat speed. The Narada would wreck any destroyer. Absolutely decimate one.

The Death Stars can be brought down as well. Trek can create singularities and bring down anything along with teleportational abilities Wars doesn't have.

It's a shame you lack the stones to prove yourself. I walk the walk, amigo.

Originally posted by Q99
Star Trek is a centuries old civilization with hundreds to maybe a thousand or so systems in the Federation, with ships around half a kilometer long.

Star Wars is a millennia old civilization with tens of thousands of systems (at least), and ships a kilometer and a half long.

They also have faster FTL drive.

So Wars has more resources, bigger ships, and more of them.

I agree with those who've noted the only way Trek would win is if Q got involved.

And, of course, oldTrek is stronger than NuTrek, because of course TNG's Federation is bigger with a larger fleet than NuTrek's old ships. So a new foe beating NuTrek doesn't exactly change the scales any.

Then accept.

One trilogy of your choosing versus NuTrek after Beyond hits this summer. If you're so sure of yourself you have no reason to back down, right ?

Originally posted by jaden101
You're right about so called NuTrek so far. You'd be completely and utterly wrong to argue for star wars in a full canon debate. Trek has beings that can wipe out entire civilizations with a mere thought.

Star Wars has beings that have complete control over space, time, matter and - unlike anybody we've seen in Star Trek, can bring back the dead.


Total nonsense. The Borg alone have stated numbers far in excess of Star Wars. Millions of planets, billions of ships and trillions of drones.

You are aware of the fact, that Coruscant alone has more than a trillion inhabitants?. One single planet in the Star Wars universe. You were saying? And Star Wars, you know, spans an entire Galaxy, with the Republic alone having more than a million member systems. And this is just a momentary picture out of history that spans a 100,000 years with interstellar space-travel being used as long as 40,000 years at last.


By comparison the katana fleet in the thrawn trilogy was said to be able to change the balance of power in the galaxy and it was only 500 clone Wars era ships.

You may want to check your facts before opening your mouth.
First: The Katana fleet just had 200 ships, of which 178 were active in Thrawn time. Second: They were just a "game changer" in the state of the Galaxy at that particular point. In the hight of the Galactic Empire, 200 capital ships of that size wouldn't even have been noticed given the size of the Imperial Navy.

Their most common vessel, the cube, is bigger in every dimension than a Star Destroyer is long.

And still, a Star Destroyer has the energy output of a small sun, which kind of dwarves everything the Borg have access to.

Transwarp hubs allows travel across a comparable sized galaxy in minutes.

I think you wanted to say "days" and not "minutes", and just after those hubs have been installed. Otherwise a 10,000 lightyear journey takes even the Borg a year. Your usual hyperdrive in SW can do that in about an hour.


The Douwd wipe out entire species with a thought.

Emperor Vitiate (SW:TOR) has depopulized entire planets with Force rituals and was about to end all life in the SW Galaxy with one. And, unlike the Douwd, the Bedlam spirits of the SW universe were not only capable of killing with a thought - but ressurecting at will. Pretty much beyond anything ST has to offer.


The krenim can wipe out entire civilizations with their time weapon by erasing them from ever existing.

Yup. That worked quite well for them, didn't it?


An unnamed civilisation built a Dyson sphere in ST that was the size of earth's orbit around the sun. A feat that is several hundred thousand times larger than the death star.

Nice.
Kuat Drive Yards, the facility that produces those nice Star Destroyers, is built as a connected ring orbiting a planet. The main idea about a Dyson sphere is harnessing all power a star puts out. The Star Forge and Starkiller base in the SW universe are capable of doing the same. The two Death Stars even produce far more power than your usual sun. And, by the way, the second Death Star was build in less than three years. I wonder how long the construction of the Dyson sphere took.

And of course, the SW universe has Centerpoint Station, a tech relic capable of moving planets around space with FTL speeds.


7 Small single pilot species 8472 ships can combine and do what the death star can do.

*Yawn*
The Sun Crusher, a virtual indestructible ship, could vaporize entire star systems by causing supernovas. It was just a little bit bigger than a starfighter, had just a single pilot and had to be navigated into a black hole in order to get rid of it.

And seriously: When did those bioships ever destroy a planet?


A small fleet of ships did to a planet in seconds what a Star Destroyer Base delta zero attack takes hours. The defiant alone is stated to be able to lay waste to a planet

Really?
I'm not sure you even understand what "Base Delta Zero" means. It means reducing the top soil of the planet (to a depth of several kilometers) to molten slag. Depopulizing a planet or even destroying the surface is within the possibilities of todays humanity. A "Base Delta Zero" operation is not. And that is still nothing compared to the Death Stars, Starkiller base or the Sun Crusher.


Trek has Wars beaten in numbers, firepower, superpowered beings. Everything.

In the mind of somebody who has clearly zero idea about the SWU, that might be the case...

Originally posted by quanchi112
Why not ? It's a fair judged debate.

Did I mention the lack of opponents?


Ridiculous. I've seen Star Wars movies and acting like these ships are the end all be all is foolish. The destroyers are slow and aren't known for their combat speed. The Narada would wreck any destroyer. Absolutely decimate one.

The Narada wouldn't even get through a star destroyers shields. Once more: Star Destroyers generate about as much energy as our sun. They can channel most of that into their shields - 15,000 times as much energy as the Enterprise-D. So the Narada won't get through. In return, the firepower of a Star Destroyer would probably destroy the Narada with a single volley.


The Death Stars can be brought down as well. Trek can create singularities and bring down anything along with teleportational abilities Wars doesn't have.

Apparently, you are still underestimating SW tech.
We see Nuclear Warheads (Photon Torpedos) tetonating on the surface of the Death Star and not doing significant damage. I wonder what ST weaponary would do agains that.


It's a shame you lack the stones to prove yourself. I walk the walk, amigo.

I really don't need to prove myself in the eyes of some random troll on the net, who couldn't even accept it, if I did. 😉