Why are you liberal or progressive

Started by Stigma4 pages

Originally posted by Tzeentch
> this is his 7th post that does not back up his claim

My claim that you are an ignorant is confirmed everytime you post in this thread, so there's that 👆

Seriously, it's clear you are not going to contribute much. That's ok. Now go on, play with other kids.

I call it a night. Cheers.

This is the eight post in which Stigma has failed to define "the liberal ideology" that has allegedly failed historically.

Does he actually know what liberalism is? Who knows?

Yeah, tzeentch, stop questioning stigma's rightness. 👇

"Which … was a silly idea of his, given the plethora of policies that constitute liberalism. Nevertheless, if I were to mention one it’d be the one I already stated before:

Modern liberalism is about concentration of power and disregard for individual freedom" --- my post on the previous page.

I'd say perfect definition 🙂

Tzeentch. You tried, you failed (not that it was surprising) That's ok.

It's all clear that you are unable to address my points 👆

BTW Thanks Adam, I knew some liberals are intelligent... .oh wait. 🙁

Originally posted by Slay
I think that every rational person here knows that liberalism is a mental disorder.

Originally posted by Placidity
I've studied mental disorders and can confirm this is true.

👆

Originally posted by Stigma
[b]"Which … was a silly idea of his, given the plethora of policies that constitute liberalism.
And yet, this "plethora of policies that constitute liberalism" didn't stop you from making a blanket assertion about the entire ideology. 👆 Try to keep up my son.

Originally posted by Stigma
[b]disregard for individual freedom"
Like the freedom to marry who you want?

If the marriage part was a jab at gay civic unions it should be noted that communist states persecuted homosexuals.

Originally posted by Tzeentch
And yet, this "plethora of policies that constitute liberalism" didn't stop you from making a blanket assertion about the entire ideology. Try to keep up

Um, first post of yours when you offer something more than a snip remark and you misconstrue things.... not good at all.

It is a description of facts. And I exlicitly said "one" of many facets of modern liberalism, so I did not attempt to simplify things. 👆

Originally posted by Tzeentch
my son.
[Luke]That's not true! That's impossible![/Luke]

Originally posted by Tzeentch
Like the freedom to marry who you want?

Like freedom to carry guns if you want?

Seriously, one step forward into the right direction and two steps back does not mean you are progressing.

They do one thing good, and them immediatelly jumb to encroach on basic freedoms that founded the US.

Hence, my point that modern liberals are regressives, in fact.

The core issue is this:

The more the public sector expands, the less the private sector can have. The more powerful the government, the less liberty citizens enjoy.

Unfortunately, modern liberlalism hijacked by socialist sentiments is about centralization of power and thus at odds with the spirit of liberty.

Yeah, because marrying whoever you want and carrying as many guns as it's physically possible represent the same danger to society!

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Yeah, because marrying whoever you want and carrying as many guns as it's physically possible represent the same danger to society!

Gay marriage causes hurricanes and earthquakes and tornadoes so yeah they probably do.

Glad to see that Jaden brings a cogent and concise argument to the table, as always. We need more of that around here.

I'm not a republican because I'm gay, so It would kinda be a oxymoron if I became a republican

Originally posted by Jesus McBurger
I'm not a republican because I'm gay, so It would kinda be a oxymoron if I became a republican

Could be a log cabin Republican.

Though I agree, it takes some major cognitive dissonance to be Republican and gay...

Originally posted by jaden101
Gay marriage causes hurricanes and earthquakes and tornadoes so yeah they probably do.

Maybe we can weaponize that.

Originally posted by Slay
Glad to see that Jaden brings a cogent and concise argument to the table, as always. We need more of that around here.

Thanks, buddy

#VoteTrump2016

Originally posted by jaden101
Thanks, buddy

#VoteTrump2016


Hey, as long as David Duke isn't running, Trump is the best option.

YouTube video

😂

Sweeden wants to raise taxes to pay for returning ISIS fighters into their country😂😂

The guy makes it a point to emphasize 'extreme' in 'extreme liberalism'. Pretty much anything taken to an extreme can be characterized as a mental disorder. And yeah, Sweden has kinda been going off the deep end recently.

http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/05/18/stockholm-syndrome-sweden-offers-taxpayer-funded-benefits-to-lure-alienated-jihadists-home/

I agree, but this is the may Europe wants to go. Just look at everything that is going on.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/05/18/stockholm-syndrome-sweden-offers-taxpayer-funded-benefits-to-lure-alienated-jihadists-home/

I agree, but this is the may Europe wants to go. Just look at everything that is going on.


Well, like I said, Sweden is a joke right now, but the current government won't survive the next election. Support for their right-wing has been on a massive rise in recent years. And no, this is not where most of Europe wants to go. Even other highly liberal Nordic countries are appalled at what's going on in Sweden.

Why is Sweeden acting like a bunch of idiots right now? How can these policies, who on earth would allow this to happen?