Darth Jadus & SoD Maul vs Barsen'thor & Count Dooku

Started by AncientPower4 pages

@Beni

Difference being Kenobi is a defensive duelist at this time, which is even worse when you consider Makashi butchers Soresu, compared to Maul facing Jinn and Kenobi, both of whom were heavy Ataru users.

We don't see exactly how short it is, but Maul floors Secura and is implied to be capable of beating Mace.

A problem he'll face here given Maul is even stronger than his brother as evidenced by Maul's Lockdown feats.

Yeh well this time there wasn't any bullshit surrounding the fight.

The Pre Viszla fight was Maul putting on a show as Filoni confirmed.

Dooku was not contending with Yoda, two sources claim so, every other says he was way out of his depth entirely. Darth Maul via rage nearly killed Palpatine after days of shitty conditions, well before TPM. Maul stands about as much chance as Dooku against such a level of opponent.

The Revenge of the Sith novel says Yoda never had a chance, compared to a junior book claiming otherwise.

Dooku makes up for it mostly sure, but Maul isn't Opress, infact he pretty easily rivals Anakin in physicals.

I honestly don't see why the argument Dooku is > Maul in anything has any feet to stand on given Maul is implied to be superior in Shadow of Dathomir.

Originally posted by AncientPower
@Beni

Difference being Kenobi is a defensive duelist at this time, which is even worse when you consider Makashi butchers Soresu, compared to Maul facing Jinn and Kenobi, both of whom were heavy Ataru users.

We don't see exactly how short it is, but Maul floors Secura and is implied to be capable of beating Mace.

A problem he'll face here given Maul is even stronger than his brother as evidenced by Maul's Lockdown feats.

Yeh well this time there wasn't any bullshit surrounding the fight.

The Pre Viszla fight was Maul putting on a show as Filoni confirmed.

Dooku was not contending with Yoda, two sources claim so, every other says he was way out of his depth entirely. Darth Maul via rage nearly killed Palpatine after days of shitty conditions, well before TPM. Maul stands about as much chance as Dooku against such a level of opponent.

The Revenge of the Sith novel says Yoda never had a chance, compared to a junior book claiming otherwise.

Dooku makes up for it mostly sure, but Maul isn't Opress, infact he pretty easily rivals Anakin in physicals.

I honestly don't see why the argument Dooku is > Maul in anything has any feet to stand on given Maul is implied to be superior in Shadow of Dathomir.

Actually, Dooku's implied to be superior in SoD. IIRC Windu assumes Maul to be Dooku's apprentice.

Originally posted by hutchy1345
I think team 1 still gets it, but this match up gives team 2 a much better chance at victory
team 1 6/10 or maybe 7/10
While if dooku faces maul and jadus faces thor i see it being 9/10 for team 1
Adding nox instead of thor definitely changes the outcome
I think it could go either way with a 6/10 victory for team 2
Nox and dooku are too superior to maul in the force, it's just whether one of them can kill maul quick enough to help the other with jadus
Originally posted by Tondemonai
Would be much closer. I can see team 2 pulling a solid 4/10 wins. Tbh I'm torn on that matchup. Probably team 1 still, but a slim majority rather than full 8/10 for team 1 when it was 'Thor
Nox vs Maul is a weird one. I think they're on the same league as combatants, but Nox's force offense speciality might not allow Maul to take advantage of his superiority as a duelist. Team 2 can't take the majority tho.

Originally posted by AncientPower
@Beni

Difference being Kenobi is a defensive duelist at this time, which is even worse when you consider Makashi butchers Soresu, compared to Maul facing Jinn and Kenobi, both of whom were heavy Ataru users.

Makashi butchers Soresu? OK but really, source?

Fact is Dooku contended at once with two significantly greater combatants than Jinn and Kenobi. No stylistic advantage is implied beyond Dooku's exceptional skill, so we've no reason to believe he the latter would press him at all. Nor is there reason to believe Dooku would anymore pressed 1 v 1 by Padawan Kenobi, when he's destroyed him in AotC.

We don't see exactly how short it is, but Maul floors Secura and is implied to be capable of beating Mace.
Which is grounds for assuming it was at all substantial? And where?
A problem he'll face here given Maul is even stronger than his brother as evidenced by Maul's Lockdown feats.
His Lockdown feats are impressive, but we've no reason to assume Savage couldn't do better when he's more physically overpowering in combat than Maul has ever been shown to be.
Yeh well this time there wasn't any bullshit surrounding the fight.
Ventress defeated him fair and square on Dathomir, of course Dooku would hand him his ass.
The Pre Viszla fight was Maul putting on a show as Filoni confirmed.
Fair enough.
Dooku was not contending with Yoda, two sources claim so, every other says he was way out of his depth entirely. Darth Maul via rage nearly killed Palpatine after days of shitty conditions, well before TPM. Maul stands about as much chance as Dooku against such a level of opponent.
OK but let's look at the facts. Dooku was able to hold out against Yoda for 30 seconds without being defeated, within that time Sidious had Maul (who if anything was amped on rage) on the floor, begging for mercy.

Dooku is stated in the RoTS novel to have "held strong" against Yoda's assault, where Maul is not even able to perceive Palpatine's blades.

It's pretty clear who performed better.

Heck let's not forget Dooku apparently a peer to Windu, who was in turn able to stalemate against Darth Sidious himself, with an amp granted, but technical skill is what's important here.

The Revenge of the Sith novel says Yoda never had a chance, compared to a junior book claiming otherwise.
Again, the facts. The RoTS script states that Yoda initially drove Sidious into retreat, and then disarmed him in lightsaber combat.
Dooku makes up for it mostly sure, but Maul isn't Opress, infact he pretty easily rivals Anakin in physicals.
He really doesn't, at least not RoTS Anakin. Nor is he a Djem So stylist. Speed frankly is more important than strength for a Juyo user, and in that Dooku has him beat.
I honestly don't see why the argument Dooku is > Maul in anything has any feet to stand on given Maul is implied to be superior in Shadow of Dathomir.
Shadow of Dathomir? What is that a limited collector's edition? Again Barlow states Dooku is better, so right back at you.

Jadus isn't beating Thor imo and Dooku beats Maul. Team 2.

Originally posted by Nephthys
Jadus isn't beating Thor imo
I would've never expected this betrayal from you, Neph.

Thor is underrated.

So is Jadus, and by you specifically.

He has the raw power and TK to handle Thor's TK, and his knowledge in the force allows him to freaking go incorporeal and teleport around at will.

Jadus' accolades puts him above names like Malgus, Nox etc. I don't see how Barsen'thor compares.

No, I have Jadus extraordinarily high up.

Vivicar had raw power as well, on top of Thor being weakened and worn from fighting. She still defeated him. Thor *might* not be as powerful as Jadus but she's a superior fighter and should be able to take him down or equal him. I mean, she'd do better against Cipher 9 than he did.

Feats > accolades. Malgus and Nox aren't below Jadus.

Originally posted by Nephthys
No, I have Jadus extraordinarily high up.

Vivicar had raw power as well, on top of Thor being weakened and worn from fighting. She still defeated him. Thor *might* not be as powerful as Jadus but she's a superior fighter and should be able to take him down or equal him. I mean, she'd do better against Cipher 9 than he did.

Feats > accolades. Malgus and Nox aren't below Jadus.

Why would Jadus not be able to defeat him though? The only thing Jadus lacks is a fighting scene against another force user where he could properly demonstrate his capabilities. Jadus's accolades are pretty specific and comes from Valkorion (who has a greater understanding of basically everything than any other character in the era) and he really doesn't give out compliments easily. Heck, he looks down upon almost anyone he talks about and even criticizes HoT for lacking "the purity of will to direct" his immense power. Yet he says outright that Jadus is the best Sith his empire ever produced. I doubt he'd say that about someone who is so shitty at combat that they can't defeat someone like Thor who is both less powerful and less knowledgable in the force.

Originally posted by Nephthys
No, I have Jadus extraordinarily high up.

Vivicar had raw power as well, on top of Thor being weakened and worn from fighting. She still defeated him. Thor *might* not be as powerful as Jadus but she's a superior fighter and should be able to take him down or equal him. I mean, she'd do better against Cipher 9 than he did.

Feats > accolades. Malgus and Nox aren't below Jadus.

Might? What feats does the Barsenthor have that compare with Jadus?

Not seeing what puts Nox or Malgus up there with him either...

Force-only I could see team 1 winning, but in all-out, Jadus is the weak link with no veritable merit to his lightsaber resume. I'm siding with team 2 for that one.

How is Maul implied to be superior in Son of Dathomir when Mace Windu who sensed both of them at the same time blatantly tells Palpatine 'we think Dooku is the Sith Master we've been looking for, Maul was his apprentice'.

They already knew Maul was the apprentice, so...

Originally posted by ILS
They already knew Maul was the apprentice, so...

No they didn't lol
'But which was destroyed the Master of the Apprentice?'

Lel.

Originally posted by Lord Stark
No they didn't lol
'But which was destroyed the Master of the Apprentice?'
When was that said?

I figured by SoD they had worked out Maul was the apprentice since he was presumed dead but shit was still going on, the Force was still being clouded.

Change it to Nox and I'll side team 2 for the hell of it.

I've sort of forgotten what makes Nox so much better than 'Thor.

ghooooossosossosostgtss